Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Republican Party: Lose Your Home, Lose Your Vote

Posted by Booman, Booman Tribune at 9:13 AM on September 12, 2008.


Of course, that's only in swing states. Feel free to lose your home and keep your vote in Utah, Wyoming, etc.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

I can't think of anything un-health-related that is more traumatizing than losing your home. But maybe that is a good analogy. What if the chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County (Michigan) announced that he was going to challenge the right to vote of every cancer-survivor he could identify? Would that be much different from this?

The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day.
“We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses,” party chairman James Carabelli told Michigan Messenger in a telephone interview earlier this week. He said the local party wanted to make sure that proper electoral procedures were followed.

It's remarkable that Mr. Carabelli would come right out and admit his plan to disenfranchise the traumatized. And it's not an isolated incident:


Carabelli is not the only Republican Party official to suggest the targeting of foreclosed voters. In Ohio, Doug Preisse, director of elections in Franklin County (around the city of Columbus) and the chair of the local GOP, told The Columbus Dispatch that he has not ruled out challenging voters before the election due to foreclosure-related address issues.
Hebert, the voting-rights lawyer, sees a connection between Priesse’s remarks and Carabelli’s plans.

“At a minimum what you are seeing is a fairly comprehensive effort by the Republican Party, a systematic broad-based effort to put up obstacles for people to vote,” he said. “Nobody is contending that these people are not legally registered to vote.

“When you are comprehensively challenging people to vote,” Hebert went on, “your goals are two-fold: One is you are trying to knock people out from casting ballots; the other is to create a slowdown that will discourage others,” who see a long line and realize they can’t afford to stay and wait.

Strangely, we don't hear about any such efforts in Utah or Wyoming. That's evidence that this is an effort to win states through disenfranchisement, and not a principled stand against election fraud.


David Lagstein, head organizer with the Michigan Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), described the plans of the Macomb GOP as “crazy.”
“You would think they would think, ‘This is going to look too heartless,’” said Lagstein, whose group has registered 200,000 new voters statewide this year and also runs a foreclosure avoidance program. “The Republican-led state Senate has not moved on the anti-predatory lending bill for over a year and yet [Republicans] have time to prey on those who have fallen victim to foreclosure to suppress the vote.”

Here's my suggestion. Obama and Biden need to talk about this relentlessly until everyone in the nation knows about it and associates the Republican Party with cheating and heartlessness.


AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: voter fraud, housing crisis, voters' rights, home foreclosure

Booman is the proprietor of the Booman Tribune.


Thanks to Dems' Pussyfooting, Health Industry Stocks Shoot Skyward
The bump does not appear to be indicative of broader economic improvement.
Post by Byard Duncan. December 22, 2009.
House Blue Dog Switches Party, Stiffing Democrats for $1 Million in Campaign Funds
Rep. Parker Griffith enjoyed campaign support of $1 million from the Democratic Party. But that was a year ago, and this is now.
Post by Adele Stan. December 22, 2009.
Hey Progressives, the Health Care Fight Is Still On: Time to Push Back
We're in the midst of a defining moment in the health care debate. Now's not the time to let up pressure.
Post by Katrina Vanden Heuvel. December 22, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?