Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Who's Subsidizing the Electric Car?

Posted by Phil Mattera, Clawback at 4:50 AM on September 9, 2008.


Flint ... General Motors ... electric car ... subsidies -- where to begin?
chevroletvoltdc2

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Announcements by U.S. cities of subsidy packages for new automobile plants have become commonplace, but the most recent one is fraught with irony. Last week, the city council of Flint, Michigan voted unanimously to grant several tax breaks to General Motors in connection with the construction of a facility that will produce engines for the company’s planned plug-in electric car called the Chevrolet Volt, which is expected to start production in 2010.

The deal includes a 15-year, 50 percent abatement of real property taxes on a new 500,000 square-foot plant, a 100 percent abatement of taxes on personal property (i.e. equipment) and the designation of the site as a brownfield redevelopment, which would make the plant eligible for additional state tax breaks. Flint officials have not yet released an estimate of the total cost of the package.

Flint … General Motors … electric car … subsidies -- where to begin?

The typical U.S. auto subsidy story involves a foreign carmaker getting a ton of money to construct a new plant on a greenfield site in a Southern state where unions are scarce. Think of Volkswagen’s recent announcement it will open a plant in Tennessee, which follows a long string of investments by companies such as Toyota, Nissan, Honda and Hyundai in states such as Alabama, Mississippi and Texas.

The GM/Flint story, by contrast, involves a U.S.-based company investing in an established industrial area of a Northern city where the United Auto Workers is well entrenched. It is unlikely that Flint’s subsidies will match what foreign carmakers receive in the South, though it is worth noting that GM apparently intends to seek additional aid from the state of Michigan, which would presumably cover not only the engine plant in Flint but also the plant in Detroit/Hamtramck where the Volt will be assembled. GM, along with Ford and Chrysler, is seeking federal assistance as well.

There are apparently mixed feelings about GM’s plans in Flint, which calls itself the “birthplace of General Motors” and has been celebrating the 100th anniversary of the company’s founding with public events such as a parade of vintage GM cars. Yet Flint has also suffered through waves of GM downsizing that have cost the city many thousands of jobs over the past quarter-century. The travails of the city were made famous in Michael Moore’s 1989 documentary film Roger & Me.

The Volt facility, however, will create no new jobs. It will be staffed by about 300 existing GM workers in Flint, whose positions will be counted as “retained.” Flint City Councilman Jim Ananich told the Detroit News: “A lot of people still feel…General Motors owes us more than just a couple hundred jobs.”

The same argument could be made about tax revenue. It is true that GM is hemorrhaging cash -- it posted a loss of more than $15 billion for the second quarter of this year -- but will the property tax savings from Flint do much to rectify that mess? The tax payments would mean much more to a struggling city than to the company’s bottom line. It’s clear that GM would find a way to build the engine plant even without the abatements.

At the same time, I can understand why Flint would be willing to pay to get a foothold in a forward-looking part of GM’s operations. Subsidizing a plant that will manufacture a component for a cleaner-energy vehicle is more palatable than sinking money into conventional auto production. It should be noted, however, that the Flint plant will make the “dirty” part of the Volt -- the gasoline-powered engines that will extend the range of the car beyond the 40 miles allowed by the battery-driven electric motor.

One can only hope GM is serious about the Volt. After all, this is the company that had developed an electric car -- the EV1 -- a decade ago and declined to market it (as documented in the 2006 film Who Killed the Electric Car?). It is also odd that Vice Chairman Robert Lutz, the GM executive credited with promoting the Volt, is reported to have said privately earlier this year that global warming is “a total crock.”

I’d be a lot happier if a company without GM’s tainted track record were pioneering a plug-in electric car and creating lots of new union jobs in unsubsidized plants, but perhaps that’s something to expect not in a documentary but rather in a science fiction film.


Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch
They're all inter-related, you know.
Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009.
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper
This is one contorted excuse.
Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009.
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever'
Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit!
Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The rape of the middle class charges on - full steam ahead!
Posted by: PaulC on Sep 9, 2008 9:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These god-forsaken US auto company CEO's did everything in their power to drive their businesses into the dirt, including sinking billions of dollars each and every year over the past few decades on mind-numbingly idiotic commercials for ever-larger, more and more absurd monster vehicles with ever larger profit margins and lower and lower mpg, all in the face of overwhelming evidence that oil prices were headed inexorably higher even as the Armageddon-like dangers of global warming loomed ever-closer.

Other neat tricks include the usual bribing of Congress to forestall any increase in CAFE standards that might have given them the opportunity to be more competitive down the road.

None of this mattered to the bright lights who ran these companies - everything revolved around short term profit, and the big boys pushing this approach had their huge stock options, buyouts and golden parachutes standing by to make sure they were not on board when the USS Titanic hit the glacier they all knew was out there - just out of sight.

Now the Titanic is sinking while all of the foreign companies are laughing their asses off at the dimwitted Americans being victimized again by their own leaders and elite.

America truly has become the laughing stock of the world and its citizens the fodder for their scheming.

The response of the perpetrators? Simple, the American public got what they deserved. In a land that now preaches every man for himself - it is the law of natural selection twisted into a grotesque anthropomorphic and immoral form called Social Darwinism. The poor are poor precisely because they deserve to be, and the rich are rich precisely because they deserve to be.

It is all so wonderfully simple. Simple ideas for simple minds. Or so it would seem.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry if I missed the "irony;" I didn't mean to
Posted by: halg on Sep 13, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is so "ironic" (as you say in the first paragraph) about this situation?

Here is a nearly ancient Michigan city (in terms of the automobile manufacturing era, being one of its first) that is struggling to figure out how to create jobs and develop revenue for the city. The only "irony" as I see it is that the plan fails to do either (or was that it?).

The whole thing sounds like a ruse. This is one more play for some people who call themselves "capitalists" which they are clearly not. Real capitalists do not go crying to the government for a custom-catered, socialist corporate welfare program. No, real capitalists gamble their investment money knowing full well that there can be huge losses as well as winnings. Capitalism is a casino where human lives and the environment are played as chips on very chancy bets.

There is no irony in the Flint plan, though. We've been seeing this scenario over and over again, especially in the auto industry, but more recently in the financial sector. Americans are firmly against any form of socialism, even though they routinely give away their tax dollars to subsidize the already-wealthy who do not know how to manage anything, especially money.

I guess Americans are OK with corporate welfare, but not assistance to actual human beings.

This story is NOT ironic at all. It is TYPICAL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]