Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Orleans: Nobody Asked, Why Not Sooner?

Posted by Harry Shearer, Huffington Post at 12:10 PM on August 31, 2008.


Why isn't New Orleans ready for a storm everyone knew would eventually come?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Of course, the primary hope is that this question remains, if not rhetorical, at least not forensic. The hope is that Hurricane Gustav doesn't prove the fragile repairs of the deeply defective levee and floodwall system in New Orleans have been repairs in name only, that the storm goes west, or east, that it peters out, or, most miraculously, that the repairs by the Army Corps of Engineers actually strengthened the system to a point where it can protect the city.

But one question does need to be raised now, before we know next week's outcome. After Katrina, the Corps wasted nine months in lying and refuting the findings of expert teams of engineers -- the Corps insisted the levees were over-topped, while the teams reported disturbing evidence of construction and design flaws. Finally, after denigrating the experts for months, calling them liars in the local press, the Corps issued its own report in June 2006, calling the system it had designed and constructed "a system in name only."

Most crucially, the Corps announced that the system would be repaired, up to the advertised level of the pre-K system, the so-called 100-year storm, by 2011.

Maybe somebody in Congress asked, in some hearing, why will this take six years? But nobody asked that question in public, nor the obvious followup: what's the city, and its citizens, supposed to do in the meantime, say, in 2008?

The old slogan, in engineering as in many other lines of work, is that you can have it good, fast, and cheap -- pick two out of three. Is money the reason New Orleans has to wait three more years before even the semblance of protection is in place? If so, what politician, Democratic or Republican, will speak up to suggest that that schedule needs to be accelerated, that good and fast has to replace good and cheap?

UPDATE: For those new to this subject, or for those who cling to misinformation about the 2005 disaster, here's a video that should be enlightening:

Digg!

Tagged as: new orleans, gustav


Stephen Baldwin Is a Liar and an Ass
The only downside of the presidential election: Stephen Baldwin will not be leaving the country as promised if Obama won.
Post by Lisa Derrick. November 21, 2008.
See (Literally) Why Al Franken is Gaining Votes
Minnesota Public Radio's website has examples of the kinds of errors voters made when marking paper ballots.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. November 20, 2008.
Why Would Obama Stick With Gates as Defense Secretary?
There hasn't been a Democratic Defense Secretary since 1996. Why wouldn't Obama choose one now?
Post by Chris Bowers. November 20, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Corporate Welfare
Posted by: FoonTheElder on Aug 31, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They aren't ready because the Bush administration was too busy paying millions in corporate welfare to the usual corporate buddies. The ones who collect money but do nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not sooner?
Posted by: fg on Aug 31, 2008 9:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because "the administration" was pissing away zillions in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wonder if Bush has "deployed"
Posted by: Quannah on Aug 31, 2008 11:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater to New Orleans again for "security detail?"

This is shameful. Absolutely shameful.

Anyone with two firing synapses knows this new "plan" of theirs isn't going to be any better. And I heard the FEMA director this morning say that we shouldn't worry, because they have had the New Evacuation Plan in place since last month! LAST MONTH!

WTF have they been doing for the past three years???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Update video re: midwest levee failure? Poor rebuilding?
Posted by: dsalexan on Sep 2, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To make this more accessible to those with relatives outside of Louisiana who might otherwise fail to make the connection, this video would have much more impact by appending at least (1) a short tag to update the levee situation as of early 2008 & showing actual recent levee failures throughout the midwest [rather than the theoretical possibility of failure in California], and (2) poor rebuilding materials used in New Orleans.

And as for New Orleans, a tad of basic science - 15 seconds showing use of poor quality sand by US Army Core of Eng in rebuilding N.O. levees, versus better quality earthen materials that would make this system stronger - would go a long way toward making this a more useful video.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get real about New Orleans
Posted by: truthlover on Sep 2, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's high time for a realistic decision on a city that is mostly below sea level - a level which is already rising.

The wetland area that used to give some protection is being washed away. This is partly because the vegetation has been destroyed and efforts to re-plant have failed.

Levees, to give reliable protection, must be built to withstand category 5+ storms, they must be constantly repaired, and (given the rising sea level again) built higher and higher with the consequent additional reinforcements.

The cost, were it to be done properly (and we KNOW it won't be) would be astronomical - all public money down a black hole.

OK, we all know they've done it in Holland, but the Dutch really don't have anywhere else to go. America has vast tracts of land where these people could relocate to. Oh, and by the way, the Dutch are starting to have serious problems with sea flooding, despite their technology.

To keep re-settling the poorest members of society in the flood plain that is most of New Orleans does them no favors whatsoever. It is simply setting them up for more disruption and destruction of their homes and goods.

A family of Katrina refugees lives down the street from me. If they have decided not to go back, they have made a very sensible decision.

The French Quarter is on higher ground: let them do their Mardi Gras stuff, become a small tourist destination.

Apart from that, get real, and get OUT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get real about New Orleans Posted by: carcinoid112
» RE: Get real about New Orleans Posted by: truthlover
Re:
Posted by: zombo08 on Sep 28, 2008 6:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]