Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dems' New Take on Trade is Good News for American Families

Posted by Staff, Citizens Trade Campaign at 12:00 PM on August 26, 2008.


Citizens Trade Campaign takes a look at the Democrats' position on trade and like what they see.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Editor's Note: This is a press release from our friends at Citizens Trade Campaign.

Washington D.C. -- After more than a decade of division within the National Democratic Party on the issue of free trade, the organization codified a clear position for the first time in their platform going into the Denver Convention.

"This language is nothing less than groundbreaking," said Andy Gussert, National Director of Citizens Trade Campaign. "For the first time, a presidential platform publicly and formally commits to amending past trade deals, ending NAFTA-style agreements and reforming institutions like the G8 and World Trade Organization." The final 2008 platform draft includes more than 3000 words across twenty-four separate pages that address specific trade and globalization issues.

NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, was first negotiated by President George Herbert Walker Bush, but Democrat Bill Clinton made its passage a priority in 1993. Since then, Democrats have often split on the issue of so-called "free trade", and have increasingly moved away from supporting the NAFTA model in favor of reform. "This platform gives a clear indication, for the first time, where the Democratic Party is on fair trade," added Gussert. "They want more of it."

"It's important to see a movement away from failed trade models of the past", said Mark Levinson, Chief Economist of the labor union UNITE HERE! "The Obama Agenda describes trade as a positive international tool for bringing about enforceable labor and environmental standards, human rights, poverty alleviation and climate control. This is a major step forward."

Members of the farming community are also supportive. "They've hit on several of the most egregious unfair trade practices-including currency manipulation, lax consumer standards and violations of environmental standards," added Tom Buis, President of the National Farmers Union. "More importantly, they've promised to stand firm against future agreements that fail to live up to these benchmarks. This will allow American farmers to better compete on a more level playing field."

State chapters of the Citizens Trade Campaign worked throughout the primary season to birddog the presidential candidates and seek commitments in trade and globalization issues, securing pledges from members of both parties. Most of the strongest commitments made by Senator Obama in response to written questionnaires ended up codified in the national platform language.

The platform outlines that no future bilateral trade agreements "will stop the government from protecting the environment, food safety, or the health of its citizens; give greater rights to foreign investors than to U.S. investors; require the privatization of our vital public services; or prevent developing country governments from adopting humanitarian licensing policies to improve access to life-saving medications." The platform also adds that trade deals "must not come as blank checks," and American support will only be "coupled with an insistent call for reform."

"The platform includes welcome statements about trade helping to alleviate poverty in the developing world," said Martin Shupack of Church World Service. "But to do that, the U.S. will have to fully respect the right of developing countries to safeguard and nurture their own domestic economies, and to promote and protect their own small-holder farmers, urban workers, and domestic manufacturers."

"The language outlines a vision of trade that will serve the needs of the many instead of the few," noted Sister Catherine Pinkerton CSJ, a NETWORK Staff Member. "Agreements should act as a tool to alleviate poverty and increase human rights across the world. Trade can be an instrument of development for both ourselves and our trading partners."
No past state or federal platform, from either party, has covered the trade issue so in depth. "In the past, we were lucky to have trade mentioned, and settled for half a loaf," added Gussert. "It's nice when you get nine out of ten slices."

Specific trade excerpts from the 2008 platform draft can be found here.

A current version of the 2008 platform in its entirety is located here.

Digg!

Tagged as: democrats, trade, nafta


Say Goodbye to Common Sense: RedState Compares Health Care Reform to Attack on Pearl Harbor
It's beginning to seem that the right-wing media simply doesn't know what the word terrorism means.
Post by Brooke Obie. November 25, 2009.
Damn Good Recipe for Stuffing Right Here
Seriously.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 25, 2009.
Dana Perino Claims No Terrorist Attacks on U.S. During Bush Presidency
And here are the reasons why this should not be a shocking comment coming from her.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 25, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?