Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Media Blindly Accept That Russia-Georgia Conflict Is Good For McCain

Posted by Ben Armbruster, Think Progress at 6:01 AM on August 14, 2008.


The Russia-Georgia gives us a preview of what President McCain will be like, and it isn't pretty.
mccainwarmonkey

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Since the violence broke out last week between Russian and Georgian military forces, pundits and media figures have been trying to determine how the conflict will affect the U.S. presidential election. Many in the media, however, have blindly asserted -- seemingly without examining any evidence -- that the war in Georgia helps Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). Some recent examples:


- Jill Zuckman, Chicago Tribune: "It's just sort of a perfect thing for him."

- Jeff Birnbaum, Washington Post: "This is McCain's advantage here, advantage McCain. This is right in his sweet spot in foreign policy national security."

- Mark Halperin, Time Magazine: "I think McCain benefits...this is good politically for John McCain"
Watch the compilation:

Halperin hinted at why many in the media think the Georgia-Russia conflict is a winner for McCain, because it "allows him to talk tough on foreign policy."

But as Josh Marshall notes, "watching John McCain speak about the Georgian crisis [...] should deeply worry anyone interested in a sane US foreign policy," suggesting that a President McCain would have pushed the U.S. closer to war during this particular crisis: "People need to wake up and get a look of the preview he's giving us of a McCain presidency." Some reasons to be worried:

- Group of 8: McCain wants to kick Russia out of the G8 -- a plan he reiterated just yesterday and one that a "senior U.S. official" recently called "impossible" and "just a dumb thing."
- League of Democracies: McCain has cited Russian "behavior" as justification to create a "League of Democracies" -- a radical plan with a "hidden agenda" to "kill the United Nations" and one that has been "greeted with alarm by some Republican supporters and wariness by important U.S. allies."
- Trusted Broker: The fact that McCain's top foreign policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann, has spent a number of years lobbying on behalf of Georgia which raises some questions about whether McCain would serve as an honest broker in the Russia-Georgia conflict.
So it seems that for the media, McCain's "tough talk" and thus predisposition for war is a political benefit.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, russia, mccain, g8, georgia, mainstream media sucks

Benjamin J. Armbruster is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Conservatives Register Tea Party as Official Third Party In Florida
Die-hard right-wingers have announced that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is the next target in the GOP civil war.
Post by Matt Corley. November 9, 2009.
Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Fred Phelps' Church Protesting Outside Sasha and Malia Obama's School
Scary.
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If its sneaky, snotty, selfish,
Posted by: weathered on Aug 14, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
remarkably arrogant and terribly deceitful its a;zionist/neocon manipulating media production.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just don't get it
Posted by: Spot on Aug 14, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's really sad is that anyone might think McCain is strong on Foreign Policy. Just because a seemingly tailor-made conflict involving nations whose names he could already pronounce erupts does not prove his ability to lead.
In fact, The United States have so very little power in this conflict that to assume what either McCain or Obama says will have an impact is plain narcissism and ignorance.
There's just no leadership involved here. If we're not careful, we'll elect a telegenic president, not an actual leader with some new ideas. With Paul and Kucinich forced out of the running months ago, it might be too late already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Diplomacy now the first Obama chant
Posted by: solrev on Aug 14, 2008 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the conflict could work really well for Obama or at least the Obama that started a run for the presidency more than a year ago. He should come out with a strong diplomacy argument, there is no US military solution in Georgia. Russia took the opportunity to smack Georgia and the US. We set all the precedents and now Condi can not say anything but “you will lose world status”. Direct diplomacy with Russia and Georgia would end the problem in a heartbeat. In place of playing the cold war card, we should say, buddy Russia pull back across your borders and we will let the Georgians establish the independence structure of the areas involved. Russia has already proved to the world that we are just the over the hill gang, a debt paper tiger. Spend some bucks to get UN support for something Russia can veto Bushies rattle, “shaken it hear boss”.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Do You Become a Media Commentator
Posted by: FoonTheElder on Aug 14, 2008 12:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So exactly how do you become a media commentator. Do you have to actually know anything or do you just have to be able to repeat what big corporations (including your bosses) and their pawns in the government tell you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the correct answer is (b) Posted by: hurricane hugo