Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hate Politics Leads to Violence: Tennessee Shooter Attacked Liberals

Posted by David Neiwert, Firedoglake at 10:55 AM on July 28, 2008.


James David Adkisson attacked a church, killing two people and wounding seven more, all because of it's liberal views.
liberalhuntingpermit.thumbnail

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In Tennessee this weekend, the chickens came home to roost when a gunman named James David Adkisson walked into a Universalist Unitarian Church and began shooting. So far, two people are dead, and seven more were wounded. He was saying "hateful things," according to all the news reports.

Naturally, right-wingers like the Ole Perfesser tried to fob it off on "Christian haters" -- Adkisson was the son of a church deacon and evidently hated going to church. But that also ignores the fact that he identified himself as a "Confederate."

Now, MSNBC is reporting this morning that Adkisson targeted the church because of its liberal politics. A four-page letter police recovered, according to Knoxville police officials, referred constantly to his "stated hatred for the liberal movement."

Right-wingers love to "joke" about mowing down, rounding up, and otherwise "wiping out" all things liberal. It's become a standard feature of conservative-movement rhetoric. And whenever anyone calls them on it, they have a standard response: "Aw, c'mon -- it's just a joke!"

In reality, of course, rhetoric like this has historically played a critical role in some of the ugliest episodes in American history, as well as thousands of little acts of xenophobic brutality: functionally speaking, it gives violent -- and frequently unstable -- actors permission to act on these impulses. People like this always believe they're standing up for what "real Americans" think -- and the jokes tell them that this is so.

This was a violent attack on liberals. It was inspired by years of wingnuts talking about how much they hate liberals and wish they could do something about them. This man did. But watch the people who have been telling these "jokes" run away from any culpability for it.

Digg!

Tagged as: politics, violence, right wing, shooting, tennessee, hate speech, james david adkisson, unitarian church, tragedy

David Neiwert is a freelance journalist based in Seattle, and the assistant editor of Crosscut.


Jon Stewart Takes on Israel's Attack on Gaza
He’s braver than me, that’s for sure.
Post by Holly. January 9, 2009.
In Defense of the Sanjay Gupta Appointment
I understand the critiques launched by Paul Krugman, John Conyers and others -- but I think Gupta is an inspired choice.
Post by Jane Hamsher. January 9, 2009.
Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Converging
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jul 28, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hate speech is rampant on the radio and on cable "news" shows. The country could elect an African-American as president, and many people are not happy in the slightest with that possibility. The country, as has been seen in polls, is pro-torture, and many Americans (as the church-shooter, apparently) are suffering economically. Iraq and Afghanistan vets (who have seen horrible crimes committed by their fellow American soldiers against innocent civilians) are coming back home.
It all is converging.

What I fear is that this church shooting will only be the beginning of right-winger-killing-liberals attacks. Those on the right are particularly susceptible to the urge to do what others are doing.
Hopefully no one has been inspired by the shooting.

{On a related note: Just think who in our society might have been shot up if liberals were even a tenth as violent and gun-happy as conservatives. I must stress that NO BODY deserves to be shot dead. (But some people do indeed deserve to have a fair trial before being executed by lethal injection for their many war-crimes...)}

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's kill Rush Limbaugh!
Posted by: anastasi on Jul 28, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just kidding!

Let's see what the reactions are when this post gets Googled.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's not Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Let's not Posted by: Moira61
» Just take away his drugs Posted by: hurricane hugo
The gunman seems..
Posted by: Bbear41 on Jul 28, 2008 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...To have been hostile of organized religion AND to liberals. Odd, it's usually Fundamentalist who hate UUs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from Knoxville
Posted by: johnthetreehugger on Jul 28, 2008 12:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
y'all,
it goes without saying that this is a tragedy for the community of Knoxville.

however, given the rhetoric of hate towards liberals, it is worth pointing out a few things being reported in the media here in Knoxville (and seemingly verified by eyewitness accounts):

one of the church members threw himself between the shooter and the children and took a blast to his body and died.

three others, including a UT History Prof, tackled the sick fuck while he paused to reload, having only gotten off a few shots.

these elite, latte drinkin', liberal commies, tackled a man with a shot gun, punched the shit out of him and put him in 2 arm bars before the cops arrived to take him away.

see his bruised face and body at wbir.com

so the cruel irony in all this is that a sick and twisted conservative, angry at being unemployed under a conservative government, targeted liberals for slaughter, but ended up getting his ass kicked and disarmed by the very people he tried to kill.

its a sad tragedy for those involved, but i'm betting it will make the liberal religous set here in knoxville draw together for healing and ultimately stronger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liberals want to be loved!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 28, 2008 12:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a crock this article is.. Implying that an otherwise "sane" person targeted "liberals" just becuae of their politics.

Then they throw in the "confederate" issue implying that there is a sin in that - then after demeaning an entire group and display a total lack of understanding surrounding southerners culture wonder why they aren't loved.

Anyone who walks into a church and starts shooting has a screw lose. Anyone who attributes it soley to the fact that the victims were liberal has more than a screw lose!

The true fact is that most churches fall on the liberal side of things when it comes to domestic issues - abortion aside. So who's to say whats "liberal".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liberals want to be loved! Posted by: pdxlinuxchix
» What a crock indeed Posted by: Joshua Holland
This is what it's all about
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Jul 28, 2008 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mathew 10: 34-38:
"Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's foes will be those of his own household. He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me."

Unitarians don't beleive in the Trinity and they don't accept Jesus as the son of god, so it shouldn't surprise anybody that somebody raised to be a fundamentalist in religion intoxicated America would do something like this. This is a case of the literal interpretation of the Bible in action.

If this is not what Christianity is about, then why does the New Testament advocate in plain language intolerance and hate for non-believing family members? Why is something like this still printed in a book that Christians say is the word of god?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]