Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Chuck Norris Goes on the War Path for Red States

Posted by Thers, Whiskey Fire at 11:00 AM on July 15, 2008.


Self-described "black-belt patriot" wants to remove 385 representatives so small "red states" have the same influence as Cali.
chucknorris

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 


Chuck Norris is mad, hoppingly so, and is not afraid to use extra punctuation marks to express his rage.


If members of Congress are not relevant or improving Americans' lives, why do we elect and re-elect them into office?!

His answer to this interrogative exclamation is Grandpa Simpsonesque in its elegance: There are too many members of the House of Representatives. Please eliminate 385.



You see, the problem is, the current arrangement is bigoted against states where there aren't a lot of people, but what people that live there happen to be conservatives. Let us examine this thesis closely, as it is, in its own way, astonishing.

If you ever have heard the saying "too many cooks in the kitchen," then you know how I feel about Congress.

What about the saying "too many cooks spoil the broth"? You know, the actual one?

We have more representatives than we need and even many more than the Constitution requires. What many might not realize is that there is nothing ultimately sacred about the present number of people we have in the House of Representatives. Actually, the proper number of representatives from each state has been debated since our Founders' time. The Constitution endeavors to assure fairness and equity by requiring each state to have at least one representative, two senators and representation in the Electoral College. (At the other extreme, it states, "The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand.") So why not go with the fewest number allowed? It seems to me that in our day, in both House and Senate, fewer representatives by area would be more reasonable and effective than more representatives by population.

It is perhaps true that Chuck Norris knows how to kick people in an expert fashion, but that notwithstanding, he seems to be somewhat confused as to the actual purpose of The People's House, which some scholars hold is to, uh, represent the people by population. In this sense it is distinct from the Senate. However, in regards to the final sentence of the foregoing, I agree that we really ought to send fewer Representatives to the Senate, as that particular practice is confusing for everyone involved.

The current numbers in the House are stacked in discriminatory ways. For example, California has a large liberal voice with its 53 representatives. How fair is that for smaller, more conservative states that have between one and five representatives in the House?

In a democracy it is of course unfair that a larger amount of people should be allowed to have a greater amount of political influence than a smaller amount of people, especially in the case of "liberals."


I believe just as we have one governor per state, we should consider reducing Congress to one representative and two senators per state (the minimum the Constitution requires). If one representative works for Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming, why can't it work for the rest of the states? Here's a movie we all can star in: "Honey, I Shrunk the Congress!"

Well, at least we can say for certain that Chick Norris has not lost his genius for picking out shitty scripts. Or his ear for stupid dialogue. But he does have a flair for the thrilling finale:

Disappointment with modern-day government and the preservation of our Founders' America is exactly why I've just completed my book "Black Belt Patriotism," which you can pre-order now on Amazon.com. It will be released in September through Regnery Publishing. It is my critique of what is destroying our country and how we can rebuild it and restore the American dream. I wrote the book because, as that famous "Network" line goes, "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

I honestly have not looked forward to a book release date with greater delight than when we learned that Liberal Fascism was going to hit the shelves.



(Incidentally, the Chuck Norris joke thing has jumped the shark, so if you are tempted to make one, I suggest instead that you throw it under the bus, to the extreme.)

Digg!

Tagged as: house of representatives, chuck norris, "black-belt patriotism", crazy people


Irish Commission: "No Doubt" Catholic Church Covered Up Child Sex Abuse for 30 Years
The welfare of the children "was not even a factor to be considered" as complaints came in against clerics.
Post by Staff. November 26, 2009.
Glenn Beck Scoffs at Palin/Beck 2012 Ticket, Doesn't Like Palin's "Yapping"
The Beck/Palin dream ticket is not to be? NOOOOO!!!
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 26, 2009.
Right-Wing Culture Warriors Warn of Atheist Attack on Thanksgiving!
You've heard of the "war on Christmas" -- now the battle has engulfed a new holiday.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 26, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?