Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Spin-Watch: The Right is Trying to Blame Democrats for the Bush Economy

Posted by Dave Johnson, Huffington Post at 1:41 PM on July 14, 2008.


If Democrats don't act fast, they're going to lose control of the economic narrative.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The right is orchestrating a campaign to blame Democrats for the economic collapse. In cases like this it is often a matter of being the first out there with a story. For example, Progressives and Democrats could have been explaining the economic collapse on the cost of the war, or the huge borrowing that resulted from the tax cuts. But now the right is out there with a story, and the ability to get that story to the public. So we'll see which narrative takes over.

Here's the story. A major bank failed yesterday, and a Bush appointee in the government put out a statement directly blaming Democratic Senator Schumer. So the narrative the right is pumping out is that "the government" says Schumer is at fault for the bank failure. (What Schumer did was say that the bank appears to be insolvent because it was. Republicans say this "caused" a run on the bank. The fact is the bank was closed because it was insolvent, not because people were taking their money out. Runs can't cause SOLVENT banks to fail because the Fed provides all the cash needed during a run. The FDIC closes banks that are NOT solvent. But facts don't matter.) I suspect you'll be hearing a lot more of this from Limbaugh Monday.

For a few examples of the right's messaging, click to the flip side:

Here's a sample of the right's messaging on this:

Senator Schumer Causes Bank Failure

Schumer, whose self-serving publicity hounding is legendary, decided to go public with information that he knew or should have known would be detrimental to the process -- and now he arrogantly refuses to accept any blame for his own politically motivated actions that were the proximate cause of the institution's downfall -- and blames the regulatory process that he created in legislation that he largely wrote back in 1999.

BREAKING: Bank Collapses. Feds cite Sen. Chuck Schumer as "immediate cause" of collapse

Now the question is, did Senator Chuck Schumer cause IndyMac's collapse? The Office of Thrift Supervision, that regulates entities like IndyMac, says "the immediate cause" of IndyMac's collapse was Senator Chuck Schumer.

Chuck Schumer, bank killer

Two weeks ago, Schumer publicly released a letter he had written to regulatory agencies, demanding action to prevent IndyMac's collapse. Instead of shoring up the bank, the letter induced depositors to make a run on the bank. Within days, over $1.3 billion in deposits disappeared, forcing the FDIC to close the bank and pay off the insured deposits.

That move cost American taxpayers billions of dollars. Don't forget to thank Uncle Chuck when you have a chance.

$1.3 billion in losses, brought to you by Chuck Schumer

Maybe, just maybe, things like this could be avoided if the Democrats would stop meddling with the free market. The more Democrats try to interfere with our economy, the more it crashes. And the more it crashes, the more government intervention Democrats think is necessary. And somehow, Americans keep voting Chuck Schumer Co. into office.

How much money can we afford to lose before we wise up?

Schumered

LA Times: The chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee caused the second-largest bank collapse in USA history.

... Are Democrats so desperate for power that they are willing to cause bank panics that cost people billions?

Or are they just that incompetent?

... Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer cost the public more than a billion.

Where did the money go?

This casts a huge -- $1.3 billion worth -- cloud of suspicion over the Democratic Party's point man in the Senate elections this year.

It's a freight train rolling our way. Watch your backs.


WaPo, LA Times: Immigration Enforcement Is Not Working
From the east coast to the west coast reporters are covering America's dysfunctional immigration enforcement policies.
Post by Diego Graglia. October 7, 2008.
Independent Exit Pollsters in Swing States Seek Volunteers
An independent effort led by noted academics is planning exit polls in Ohio, Missouri and Pennsylvania to verify the official vote count.
Post by Steven Freeman. October 7, 2008.
Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republicans wanted deregulation
Posted by: Lauren on Jul 14, 2008 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their fingerprints are not on it too?

This sound like the pot and kettle. Shumers no goody goody. This is why they NEVER point at each other in their senate gentleman's club, they are ALL guilty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blame for the economy can be assigned to both major parties
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Jul 14, 2008 2:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not forget it was Clinton and a Democratic Congress that gave us NAFTA. We're going to be feeling the effects of that and similar job-loss legislation for a long time to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We miss the bigger picture.
Posted by: ianfan on Jul 14, 2008 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...But facts don't matter."

That there says it all.

Q: Who is the audience for the lies of the right? A: Their own base.

It's not like those same people who are going to buy that load of crap would suddenly think their own political side is wrong simply because the facts say that. This just gives them an excuse to feel the way they already wanted to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Schumer truly support hedge fund and private equity
Posted by: jackson12345 on Jul 14, 2008 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Large Investor decided to pay a few bucks to a Senator in New York to force the issue."(Prospect Mortgage Backed By Sterling Fund--Private Equity Acquired The Mortgage Branches from Indymac before FDIC takeover)

http://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/03/

"And do remember that there are many investment bankers located in New York, making them pretty influential constituents of Sen. Schumer."

www.pasadenastarnews.com/opinions/ci_9783402

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Would Be More Shocking...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 14, 2008 11:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there weren't more IndyMacs waiting to happen. Did anyone besides me treat themselves to the Wall Street Journal cover story last week concerning the new CEO of Wachovia? 2nd largest bank (if you count branches, guess who's on the verge of a big dump?) Here comes our hero, Mr. Steel has solid ties to which prominent global crime family? It's all okay, he knows Mr. Paulson personally from when they worked at the brokerage firm of Whattafuckitsotherpeoplesmoney. If it fails while he's in charge, they'll just remind everybody that the Russkie word for Steel is Stalin. Don't worry folks, sometimes there's great traction once you hit the bottom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

politics
Posted by: cpesprit on Jul 15, 2008 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yeah...saw this one coming.....
Incredible - and sad that people BELIEVE this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]