Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Terrorist" Watch-List Hits One Million Names

Posted by AlterNet Staff, AlterNet at 8:57 AM on July 14, 2008.


That's an awful lot of suspected terrorists.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

This is from the ACLU:

The nation's terrorist watch list has hit one million names, according to a tally maintained by the American Civil Liberties Union based upon the government's own reported numbers for the size of the list.

"Members of Congress, nuns, war heroes and other `suspicious characters,' with names like Robert Johnson and Gary Smith, have become trapped in the Kafkaesque clutches of this list, with little hope of escape," said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "Congress needs to fix it, the Terrorist Screening Center needs to fix it, or the next president needs to fix it, but it has to be done soon."

Fredrickson and Barry Steinhardt, director of the ACLU's Technology and Liberty Program, spoke today along with two victims of the watch list: Jim Robinson, former assistant attorney general for the Civil Division who flies frequently and is often delayed for hours despite possessing a governmental security clearance and Akif Rahman, an American citizen who has been detained and interrogated extensively at the U.S.-Canada border when traveling for business.

"America's new million record watch list is a perfect symbol for what's wrong with this administration's approach to security: it's unfair, out-of-control, a waste of resources, treats the rights of the innocent as an afterthought, and is a very real impediment in the lives of millions of travelers in this country," said Barry Steinhardt, director of the ACLU Technology and Liberty Program. "It must be fixed without delay."

"Putting a million names on a watch list is a guarantee that the list will do more harm than good by interfering with the travel of innocent people and wasting huge amounts of our limited security resources on bureaucratic wheel-spinning," said Steinhardt. "I doubt this thing would even be effective at catching a real terrorist."

Controls on the watch lists called for by the ACLU included:

* due process
* a right to access and challenge data upon which listing is based * tight criteria for adding names to the lists * rigorous procedures for updating and cleansing names from the lists.

The ACLU also called for the president - if not this one then the next - to issue an executive order requiring the lists to be reviewed and limited to only those for whom there is credible evidence of terrorist ties or activities. The review should be concluded within 3 months.

In February, the ACLU unveiled an online "watch list counter," which has tracked the size of the watch list based on a September 2007 report by the inspector general of the Justice Department, which reported that it was growing by 20,000 names per month.

The ACLU is also announcing today the creation of an online form where victims of the watch list can tell us their stories. We will collect those stories and use them (with permission) in various ways to advance our advocacy. A link to the form is available online at www.aclu.org/watchlist.

Digg!

Tagged as: terrorism, war on terror, civil liberties, watch-list, domestic surveillance


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Volunteers needed
Posted by: Skelly on Jul 14, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we should all request to be added to the list so as to bring it to it's statistical knees with the sheer volume of data that will need to be compiled! No airplane, train or bus could leave a terminal, no border crossings could be made. Instead of shrinking from the list, embrace it! Love it to death. (BTW, New Yorker, I think "this" is satire)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...with names like Robert Johnson"
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 14, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hellhound on my trail, indeed.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Do You Know?
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jul 14, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you know if you are included on this watchlist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Try to board an airplane Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: How Do You Know? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: How Do You Know? Posted by: VZEQICVA
Was the lucky winner ...
Posted by: just john on Jul 14, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... presented with a watch?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any Idea
Posted by: SoCalLib on Jul 14, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How and/or where you can find out if you're on a watch list, without having to go through all of the trouble of driving to the airport and being denied a flight?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Any Idea Posted by: modeler
I'm thoroughly convinced...
Posted by: lexicon on Jul 14, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That "incompetence" is a feature required of every Bush Administration program, process, and procedure.

That's really the only conclusion to be made. When you get to THAT level, where every single thing they touch turns to shrivels and dies, you have to cease to rule out that they're doing it on purpose.

But...why be incompetent?

As much as I'd like to assume that they just relish incompetence for incompetence' sake, I have to go with something slightly more sinister...the administration in general is a macro representation of the chief executive, who gleefully prances around as incompetently as he can, while his stealth operatives do their dirty work, away from the flamboyant spectacle of inanity.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I confess to these crimes
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Jul 15, 2008 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, confession is supposed to be good for the soul, so no doubt the God-fearing lovers of Christ who run our government will forgive me for my crimes and spare me waterboarding in the gulag if I confess right now.

MY SINS AGAINST AMERIKA
By Grandma Crabby

1. I have taken pictures of questionable aesthetic value.

2. I have signed ACLU & Moveon.org petitions.

3. I did a You Tube video where I said Dick Cheney looked like dog poop.

4. I read Greg Palast

5. I only go to church for the big summer bar-be-que and rummage sale.

6. I still hang a picture of FDR over the mantle.

7. I think the whole gang of thugs ought to be tried for war crimes, treason and be hung to die. They need to leave my old fat ass alone.



VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JUst 3 more Posted by: walldodger1969
themanwithadog
Posted by: the man with a dog on Jul 16, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is not made clear in this report is that the one million "terrorist suspects" only applies to 50% of the inhabitants of New York. As time goes by a full list will be made to include the rest of the US.

A final total that is expected should be around the fifty nine million or so give or taks a dozen either way

Remember Big Brother George is watching everyone of you!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Posters on the Alternet
Posted by: modeler on Jul 16, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can be sure to be on the list, accept the fact that the worst terrorist, G Dubja Bushit will never make it. Such is life!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]