Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Freezing Solar Energy Projects on Public Land

Posted by Laura Flanders, Firedoglake at 11:00 AM on July 2, 2008.


Bush Administration puts new solar developments on hold.
solarpanelsblue

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

So much for the Government’s much touted commitment to alternative energy…

The New York Times reports the Bush administration has placed a nearly two year moratorium on the construction of new solar energy projects on public land. While the amount of oil drilling and gas drilling on public land has reached a new high -- the President approved over 7,000 new licenses last year alone --- the Bureau of Land Management is saying it needs until the spring of 2010 to study the environmental impact solar projects might have on land in Arizona, Nevada, California and other western states.

Meanwhile the Defense Department is resisting orders to clean up Fort Meade, and two other military bases where dumped chemicals pose an imminent threat to the public health. The Pentagon doesn't want to follow the law requiring them to clean up. And guess what, the EPA is letting them get away with it.

So how about it -- do you feel Defended? Protected, Managed? I say it's time for some departmental renaming: What do you call a Defense Department that makes you sicker, an Environmental Protection Agency that won't, and a Bureau of Land Management that seems to be more about managing popular expectations about energy resources than managing public land?

You can post your suggestions here in the comments section.

Digg!

Tagged as: solar, energy


McCain's Money History and Why it Matters
McCain has led an aristocratic lifestyle as a consort to a liquor heiress, and it shows.
Post by Digby. August 21, 2008.
Poll-watch: Gallup Finds Wedding-Cake Sized Marriage Gap in Pres Race
Apparently, the married and unmarried have very different concerns.
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.
Michael Moore Dares to Ask: What's So Heroic About Being Shot Down While Bombing Innocent Civilians?
Like Iraq, Vietnam was not a noble cause. It's time we stopped letting politicians and the press perpetuate the McCain War Hero myth.
Post by Liliana Segura. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What do you call
Posted by: JSquercia on Jul 2, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I call them Republican Politics as usual .It is amazing how we need Environmental Impact studies where solar is concerned but not when there is drilling or Loging . To expect the EPA to give a rat's ass about anything other than allowing Cortporations is nieve . The Republicans put in Corporatists to head those agency designed to protect the public at large . Look at the Labor Department where Elaine Cho is really representing the AMA and Not Labor . Remember the guy involved in that mine disaster who warned the Mine Investigators that his buddy Mitch McConnel was sleeping with their boss (Ms Cho)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do you call Posted by: Lauren
» RE: What do you call Posted by: billgee
» RE: What do you call Posted by: billgee
Renaming
Posted by: Lauren on Jul 2, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about time for impeachment?

Every afternoon I turn on the TV, one of these days that is what I'm going to be hearing about as the lead story. Then it will be THE story nonstop.

Let's get it going already, we don't want to miss it do we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waning Days
Posted by: billgee on Jul 3, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there anything Bush/Cheney will do in their last days that will surprise you?

Is it only voting, the electoral college, the lame duck or the entire electoral process that doesnt work.
Lets attack Iran, too

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solar is the #1 Enemy of the United States of Oil
Posted by: channing on Jul 3, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't need "departmental renaming", we need Executive Arrests.

The DOE just issued its largest ever solar contract for a solar farm, so it isn't a surprise that the big-oil cabal behind the Bush War Criminals are seeking to undermine, delay, defuse and/or confuse the only true energy answer of the future.

Solar Deserts are growing in clout around the globe against a the tide created by the Houston monopolists who've been fighting it since at least the 1970's. With Adolf Bush as their Crusader in Chief, they've managed to steer the US into further oil-dependency while simultaneously hijacking the international trade in this dirty resource, in an effort to squeeze the very last drops of manipulated plunder prior to the wide-spread "discovery" that we can replace all energy resources with a clean, constant, safe and permanent alternative.

California's commitment to install 100,000 solar roofs/year for the next ten years scratches the surface of this potential. Spain's recent installation of a single concentrated array to supply all the energy required 20-30,000 house village is another. The Trecers.net has built this potential into a global solution that will interconnect continents and their sunshine to the demand of the non-sunny continents, and every 12 hours or so they reverse, then combine the large supplies with localized roof-top and wind-farms for permanent energy.

Next step for Bush is to declare solar technology a form of "Inciting Terrorist Activities" and "Threatening the United States of Oil". Next step for us is declare Bush an "Unlawful Enemy Combatant" and waterboard him, Cheney, Rice, Yoo and others for all their information and connections to the Criminal Corporate Underworld for propping up destruction. We need that oil profit money after all to get started with our progressive future, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a former Houstonian,
Posted by: Tara Downer on Jul 3, 2008 4:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to agree with the former comment. As a little girl (about 40 years ago), there was one house near us that had a windmill in its backyard. Houston has a constant sea breeze that blows at between 14 - 20 mph (if I remember correctly). At any rate, this family was able not only to get off the grid, but also to sell all their excess power back to the old H.L.&P. When I asked my father why we couldn't do the same thing, he told me that Houston had passed a height restriction on residential property that prevented new windmills from going up. If all the backyards on the coasts of our country would allow this old time technology, and there was an incentive for solar power, the grossly overpaid CEO's and upper level management, would no longer be able to sell their old $20/barrel oil for $140.

While it appears that Houston no longer has the psychedelic sunsets that were caused, in part, by the pollution of refineries, I wouldn't be surprised if all those businesses on the ship channel are still getting their property tax breaks in spite of the fact that those breaks were based on the premise that they would not pollute it.

The city was started by the fraud of the Allen brothers, if I'm remembering correctly, who sold a lot of swamp land to speculators. And, I know that fraud and corruption is still a huge part of its success. When the oil business tanked in the late 70's and early 80's, it effected the lives of almost all Houstonians. Office buildings sat empty, home foreclosures skyrocketed, and a lot of middle-management oil types found that their departments were no longer needed. There were A.R.M.s that had people upside-down on their mortgages (sound familiar?) and suicidal men who saw their retirement benefits disappear before their eyes. (My father suffered through two of those disappointments, and my husband was laid off while on vacation, two months before being fully vested in another oil based corporation). Many wells were simply capped off because it was going to cost more money to pump than jump off the project.

Now, Bush et.al. are telling us that offshore drilling, which can be an enormous cause of pollution, is the answer to all of our problems. I know that we want to keep our reserves so that we'll be the last nation left with oil in the ground, but surely there is someone somewhere in the government who realizes that by that time, the rest of the world won't be interested. Their scientists and governments will have found a replacement for this old technology.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just another step in the wrong direction
Posted by: cori on Jul 3, 2008 7:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
watch Bill Moyers, the journal on the internet where 2 conservations reveal that McCain is a Neo Con war monger. The program aired about 2 months ago

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reversal
Posted by: PeaceThinkTank.org on Jul 6, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The latest news is that this decision was reversed and they are letting these projects go ahead... There is one small success story and the birth of another industry...

http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/agreennetwork

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

totally ignorant.
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Jul 8, 2008 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can not image anything dumber than putting a stop to the use of solar power.

Except maybe this...

A lady got in trouble in a rich neighborhood around here because she used a clothesline to save energy.

So tacky! She was fined and clothesline ordered down.

Well, at this rate, no one will get serious about energy conservation and alternative fuels until the north pole is tropical.



Luv,
Granny

VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Preaching to the Choir
Posted by: billgee on Jul 9, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should any of this be a surprize?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]