Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Fed Up with the lies, and the disinformation? Support AlterNet and keep it honest.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dick Cheney is a Barnacle on the Rotting Hull of the Executive Branch

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 3:44 PM on June 26, 2008.


Or, so Cheney's chief of staff seems to think.
barnacle

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Exactly one year ago tomorrow, the Office of the Vice President gave up on the notion that Dick Cheney isn’t really part of the executive branch. In the midst of an oversight fight regarding the handling of classified material, the OVP had made the absurd argument about Cheney’s branch, but on June 27, 2007, the Vice President’s team decided that was too ridiculous to keep repeating.

In fact, the next day, the NYT reported, “A White House official placed further distance from the dual role argument by adding that Mr. Cheney did not necessarily agree with it.”

So, all of this unpleasantness is behind us? We can finally agree that Cheney is the Vice President, and the Vice President is part of the executive branch? Apparently not. Cheney’s reclusive chief of staff, David Addington, told the House Judiciary Committee this afternoon that the VP is “attached” to the legislative branch.

The video shows Addington reading a 1961 memo describing the OVP as belonging “neither to the executive nor to the legislative branch.”

Addington refused to go into any additional detail, saying only that Cheney is “attached” to the legislative branch. When Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) suggested that would make the Vice President a “barnacle,” Addington, disgusted, said he didn’t “consider the Constitution a barnacle.”

Just as an aside, I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen any government official express the kind of contempt for Congress as I’ve seen from Addington today. Every response to every question is soaked in pure revulsion. I keep expecting him to spit at the members of the committee after every exchange.

But that aside, Addington’s argument about Cheney’s branch was silly when he first started pushing it, and it hasn’t improved with age.

Digg!

Tagged as: cheney, barnacle

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Meet McCain's Sexy Brazilian "Foreign Policy Experience"
Ha-cha-cha!
Post by BoRev. October 6, 2008.
Now Gay People? Flailing Right Blames Everyone but Wall Street for Financial Mess
Desperation is in the air.
Post by Digby. October 6, 2008.
As the Economy Tanks, McCain's Prospects Dim
McCain campaign wants to talk about anything but the issue that's dominating the news and voters' minds.
Post by Booman. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There's a special place in hell reserved for the likes of these
Posted by: rancespergl on Jun 26, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Addington, Feith, Gonzales, Rove, Libby.

And the elegant symmetry is that for all of their days of Hades they'll still be Dick's Bitches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» another thought Posted by: rancespergl
» RE: another thought Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Daily pineapples for them all! Posted by: sasquuatch55
Not a barnacle
Posted by: akdave on Jun 26, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barnacle is way too benign a comparison. Perhaps 'tick' or 'tapeworm' would be more appropriate.

Peace,
Dave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, way too nice.
Posted by: fomented on Jun 26, 2008 7:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why are we still being nice?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's code.
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 26, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For pimple on the ass of Liberty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

please
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jun 26, 2008 8:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
put the motherfuckers in jail and let's get on with our country. If it were in my power they would all be in guantanamo now(the only ones there)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jun 27, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney and his lesbian wife are only two among the real foul and evil forces and functionaries tearing our country apart along with their right wing extremist religions.

The list of people to include in that Satanic pile of crap must include the likes of people like the entire Bush Crime Family, Gonzales, Yoo, Bybee, Rumsfeld, Russert, Matthews, Scarborough, O'Reilly, Hannity, Dowd, Noonan et.al., ad nauseam.

The only one that started out in that pile of scum and finally left is Chuck Hagel and the dozen or so States AG's who didn't knuckle under to Rove and his pack of Satanic jackals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Theater of the absurd
Posted by: sawdust on Jun 27, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, maybe it is more like the absurd ad nauseum. But here is a short list of the ridiculous "news items" that we have to endure and ponder right now (and this is just in the last few days):
1 Addington's response (where did we find THIS guy?)didn't even answer the question, yet he thought he was both smart and cute. He was neither.
2. "Several thousand Californians" have voted to name a sewage treatment plant after W. I'm sure it has something to do with what goes down the drain but he will never get it.
3.Obama's plan is to enslave white men after the election. Yeah, right.
4. Bush & Co. are too smart to bomb Iran before the election. Wanna bet on that one? About 20 million or so Americans would say you are dead wrong. ANd they are scared.
5. The WH just bypassed a whole list of EPA recommendations on pollutants by simply not opening emails. Clever and arrogant beyond my wildest imagination.
6. Right wingers, Limbaugh-ists, neo-cons and psuedo preachers are saying another war would be good for America, along with, please, another terrorist on US soil attack before the election. All of that will really go along way towards helping our homeless situation and the national debt.
7. McCain is still speaking in public.
8. Obama's decision to use only his campaign money to pay for his run for the WH, and not to use undesignated funds from the public coffers, is bad for America. Which idiot came up with that?
9. Nancy Pelosi and her crew mean well and serve the public in their best interests. Are we deaf, dumb and blind?
10. Oil speculators and Exxon/Mobil are not responsible for the hideous price of gasoline. Drilling offshore will fix everything...by about the year 2015. Maybe.
11. Telecom industries did not really shell out over $180,000 over the past two years to buy the FISA vote in the House. It's an urban myth, along with alligators in the sewers of NY.
12. George W. Bush is the product of Intelligent Design.

I think we have all rolled over and played dead to let this all proliferate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Jun 27, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched parts of this hearing and to quote Dana Milbank of the Washington Post, "If ever there was somebody who cried out for the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, it was John Yoo and David Addington". They should just be thrown into a cell and the key tossed away. I've never seen anyone with the arrogance of Addington. There's a special level in Hell for that thug. He acted like the United States Congress was wasting his oh so valuable time. He should be doing time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deb Posted by: sawdust
Addington and Yoo
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 27, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched the hearings last night on CSPAN. It was disgraceful. Addington was just like Dick Cheney, but with another face. Same voice intonations. Same snarl. Same arrogant asshole. John Yoo, however, looked scared. He tried (to no avail) to keep from answering all the questions, and he tried to back away from the havoc he created in the DOJ. He even went so far as to say we should use the Army Field Manual definition of torture! Oh, sure! Now you want to follow the law when your ass is on the line!

These two scumbags are guilty of crimes and it was apparent from their testimony that they are fully aware of that fact. Let's hope they get what's coming to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy solution
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Jun 27, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subpoena the entire Exectutive Branch. If they refuse to testify, have the police drag them in under Contempt of Congress and throw their a$$es in a DC jail overnight.

Enough is enough! Of course, the Democrats would need to grow a pair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney as a member of the Executive Branch...
Posted by: SharC on Jul 5, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a short Constitutional history lesson: Article II, Section 1, Clause 1: "The executive power shall be vested in a President...and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected..." Originally they were chosen by members of the Electoral College with the individual with the most votes becoming President, and the second place person being named Vice President. In 1804, to prevent the debacle of having a President from one party and the Vice President from another, the 12th Amendment was added and changed the procedure so that electors now had to vote separately for each office. This amendment also contained language that prevented both jobs from being held by individuals from the same state. It has always been true that if the President should die, or be impeached, convicted, and removed from office, the Vice President assumed the office. The 25th Amendment further clarified that the VP could assume the job on a temporary basis if it could be demonstrated that the President was incapacitated for a short period. Furthermore, the ONLY job specifically provided for in the Constitution is that the VP shall preside over the Senate. Thus I safely conclude that without a doubt the Vice Presidency, despite Mr. Cheney's protestations, is indeed an integral part of the Executive Branch of our government.
In my estimation, what has happened over the past nearly 8 years, is that Mr. Cheney has in fact usurped many of the roles of the presidency under himself. I have always been somewhat astounded that in 2000 Cheney was placed in charge of vetting possible VP candidtes to run with George W. Bush. He then concluded that he was the best choice! We have now witnessed what that prevarication has brought us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]