Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It's Not an Oil Crisis; It's a Transportation Crisis

Posted by Doug kreeger and , AlterNet at 10:39 AM on June 24, 2008.


We need better transportation technology, not more oil.
sailboat

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

As long we buy the Kool-Aid that we have an oil crisis, we will never come to grips with the fact that what we have is a transportation crisis.

We have known for decades that fossil fuels were finite, and that sometime in the not-so distant-future we would have to replace oil as our primary fuel.

The oil companies continued to go to the well--the government one--and convinced them that they need tax breaks and incentives to drill, drill, drill. The Bush administration thinks, as do their friend in the oil industry, that energy independence will be achieved by drilling for gas in our Alaska wilderness, our National Parks and our offshore ecosystems.

Throughout history, economic development has been spurred by good and efficient forms of transportation. Through technological advancements, we have progressed from fording rivers in a hollowed out log, to sailing, and ultimately to steam boats and gas-burning vessels. The rivers were, and still are, our natural highways linking many communities throughout the world.

Cities that have strong ferry service provide much needed mass transportation that have created thriving economies that permit not only goods and services to be transported, but workers who can commute efficiently to the workplace. Even a city like New York would never have become the strong commercial center had it not been for the completion of the Erie Canal almost 200 years ago. Water and cities have been intrinsically connected throughout history.

The challenge that we are confronted with in this country is how do we lessen our dependence on fossil fuels. It is essential that we promote alternative means of transportation and improve our mass transit systems. What is required is to make sure our elected representatives understand that a strong urban policy is required that commits investment in the very infrastructure we knew was essential hundreds of years ago. For every mile of pavement we pour, we should link a mile of mass-transit rail. For every bridge to nowhere, we should build another dock for ferry service. The only way we will ever get out of our cars is to build a better system.

Digg!

Tagged as: environment, oil


The Evilest of Evil CEOs Swiftboating Health Reform
This guy's a creep with millions to burn.
Post by Digby. July 10, 2009.
More Right-Wing Whining Over Media's Coverage of Sarah Palin
Ho-hum, the poor misunderstood woman.
Post by Eric Boehlert. July 10, 2009.
Hey Netherlands: Fox "News" Hates You! (VIDEO)
Oh, it's not just the pot and the hookers ...
Post by PZ Myers. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Comments not from the grammar police
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jun 25, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Water is very important, and is the cheapest choice transportation wise. Think about the US cities, how many major ones are not located where they are based on water, either along rivers or are based on a bay or port in lakes or oceans.

St Paul was a far up the Mississippi you could go that had a low enough grade to have rail to the river. Minneapolis - St Anthony Falls.

What I disagree with the writer on is the desire for ferries. They can be useful, very useful. But here in the Twin Cities they would be a horrendous bottle neck to our transportation system. One bridge fell down and it is already super screwed up. So give me bridges, that pedestrians and cyclist use, to your ferry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dkreeger
Posted by: dkreeger on Jun 25, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Totally agree with edit oomments. Somehow the messy first draft was posted. Revised copy has been posted. Appreciate the comments.
Doug Kreeger

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Definitions Define the Problem
Posted by: curiousdwk on Jun 25, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a good article that shows that definitions define the problem. If we don't define the problem correctly, it will never be resolved. And we need to recognize that the problem is a transportatin problem - not just an oil problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rail...
Posted by: manderson on Jun 25, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...transport is as important as water transport, especially for areas that have no large navigable waterways, which includes MOST of the country. Refurbish the rail system with TWO lines of tracks for freight and Amtrak---It is THE most fuel efficient method for transporting goods AND people.

While we're at it, let's talk about ELECTRIC trains...the big problem coming up over the horizon is the generation of electricity in enough capacity to make life something more than a 17th-century existence of candles, wood heat, and water wheels. We'll be doing much more walking than we need to if this occurs.

Although, the Corporate entities that run the world would most certainly like to see a feudal-style system where the populace is handicapped by lack of access to energy and technology, while they still have the electricity and petrol to build and run tanks, submarines, and C-130 Spectre gunships.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Making Sense
Posted by: rafey on Jun 25, 2008 2:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did I just hear someone actually make sense?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EDITING
Posted by: Joshua Holland on Jun 27, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An early draft of this was mistakenly posted. Our apologies.

A final draft now appears above and we've deleted the comments about typos and grammar issues.

-JH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are all missing the point
Posted by: nerdy southern belle on Jul 4, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest problem we face is that we are a country in love with our personal transportation. so many of our decisions are based on this power. It will take society decades to adapt to less personal freedom as enforced by the eventuality of $8 gasoline. We may see a revolt over this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]