Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Progressive Philanthropist and Radish-lover Stewart R. Mott Dies

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, AlterNet at 2:00 AM on June 18, 2008.


Bloggers pay their respects to eccentric patron of liberal causes.
stewartmott

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Offbeat, outspoken progressive philanthropist Stewart R. Mott died last week at the age of 70. Mott was a generous donor to numerous progressive non-profits and liberal political campaigns.

The New York Times obituary lists some of Mott's good works:

Mr. Mott’s philanthropy included birth control, abortion reform, sex research, arms control, feminism, civil liberties, governmental reform, gay rights and research on extrasensory perception.

His political giving, often directed against incumbent presidents, was most visible. In 1968, he heavily bankrolled Senator Eugene McCarthy’s challenge to President Lyndon B. Johnson. Four years later, he was the biggest contributor to Senator George McGovern, the Democratic presidential nominee.

When Charles W. Colson, the White House chief counsel to President Richard M. Nixon, included Mr. Mott in the famed “enemies list,” Mr. Colson said of him, “nothing but big money for radic-lib candidates.”

The NYT obit also notes that Mott was a passionate urban farmer who "cultivated 460 plant species (including 17 types of radishes), a chicken coop and a compost pile, atop his Manhattan penthouse."

For the last 15 years, Mott helped support the the FAS Project on Government Secrecy. The FAS secrecy blog looked back with affection and gratitude yesterday: "[Mott's] capacity for kindness, not his flamboyance, was his most attractive quality. We are in his debt."

DailyKos diarist Seneca Doane is dismayed that Mott's life and death have largely passed without comment on progressive blogs. He writes, "I know this makes me sound like a cranky old man, but: cherish your history. Stewart Mott mattered."

Digg!

Tagged as: stewart mott, philanthropy, progressive, obituary

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Progressive Ideas were NEVER the sole Property of the 'Hippies'
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 18, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been a long hard struggle for Progressive Ideals.The boomers laid claim to 'inventing' such philososphies. Granted they were probably the largest voice it ever had- but it was also the largest group of Betrayers when they 'Took Charge'.
I appreciate all those who kept it going all these Millenia and hope to be an asset in passing it on.The younger generation seems to have it in their blood- but our mission is not accomplished, we must continue to wage the battle- esp against those who pretend to be on our side, yet do the opposite behind closed doors, or use these ideals as a means to deceive us and manipulate the system from within it.
Hillary & Geraldine are Prime examples of what to watch for- using a Progressive idea for their own gains. Undermining the real effort and doctrines which guide it. FYI Womens Movement was for the Opportunity to Prove we have earned a Place at the Table and Do Not need a leg up.Asking for the Bar to be lowered undermines our Cause and Invalidates our efforts.The Movements intention was to promote Equality for All, NOT "Pay Backs A Bitch!" Otherwise you are taking a page out of the 'Good Ol'Boy' handbook.
Thanks for the Help Mr.Mott- we'll Keep the fire Burning until the Next Stewards are ready to take over the Flame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From his Penthouse
Posted by: billgee on Jun 18, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich are no different than you or I, Hemingway might have said

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Honorable Man
Posted by: dayenta on Jun 18, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a great man. Good to hear of him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]