Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Another City Drowns and Bush Does Nothing

Posted by Jill Hussein C., Brilliant at Breakfast at 7:07 AM on June 13, 2008.


This is the face of smaller government.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Another city. More images of men hauling sandbags. More families driven from their homes in boats to be deposited in emergency shelters with nothing but the clothes on their backs. More images of Michael Chertoff spouting platitudes like "When officials tell you to leave, leave."

The floods in the Midwest have been going on for a month, and the first steps in a disaster declaration began only yesterday.

It isn't just black people and the white poor being ignored by the Bush Administration anymore. These are the farmers growing the corn that's fed to cattle and used to make ethanol. These are the very white heartlanders that Republicans have been using as campaign props for a generation. And even they are seeing the government that's supposed to work for them turn its back on them.

This is what smaller government looks like. This is what happens when you leave everything to the states and the states are too overwhelmed to handle disasters on their own. This is what happens when you shovel money into the pockets of military contractors and the defense industry and run trillion-dollar defcits. This is what happens when you elect someone you think you'd like to have a beer with instead of someone with a half a brain in his head who's oriented towards problem-solving.

That John McCain, who promises more of what we've endured for the last eight years, is even competitive in this fall's presidential race shows how the Democrats have failed in demonstrating to the people now trying to rescue their belongings that programs like federal disaster assistance and Social Security and Medicare are the product of the very liberalism that Republicans have derided for a generation. With a wide swath of swing states now under water, and $4 gasoline, and skyrocketing food prices, and a dwindling job base, and foreclosures up 48% this year, it's hard to imagine Republican supply-side, feed-the-rich policies as being anything but completely discredited.

And yet, there's John McCain, with a tax plan that once again shovels even more cash into the pockets of the wealthy (when DOES that stuff start "trickling down", anyway?); a tax plan widely derided by economists as being -- dare I say it? -- McSame.

I would hope that by now American voters have begun to do the math. Meanwhile, the Cedar River is expected to crest today at 32 feet -- a full eight feet above yesterday's projections.


Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Incompetence IS a reason to impeach, he's AWOL in Europe, no mile high pics.
Posted by: Lauren on Jun 13, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry I can't find a more appropriate place for this today so impeachment is the unifying theme, OK?

This morning on morning Joe, sexism was again discussed as an issue in the presidential campaign. I have a question for all those people who wanted so badly to see their first woman president (it is only an impeachment away you know). The minute impeachment seriously starts, Bush and Cheney will be forced to step down and viola!, a woman is president.

My question is, If they want a woman president why aren't they calling for impeachment?

Nancy Pelosi is just as much a woman as Hillary and more deserving perhaps to being president, she IS next in line right NOW. Do we ignore that for some reason?

See I just don't get that. Barnacle? Are you stupid or something? Maybe you could explain to me why you guys never mention that FACT. I was glad to see someone explain to him how his crack about everybody's ex wife could be hurtful to ex wives in general, most of whom are very poor.

Not like him, he is rich, like most ex-husbands. Like Hillary. So if there is all this anger to have a woman president, why no support for impeachment which would instantly give us a woman president?

It is the perfect trial sized offer, a lame duck session.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Universal justice
Posted by: isnamthere on Jun 13, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there really were a God, Crawford Texas would be hit hard with natural disasters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real travesty
Posted by: Spot on Jun 13, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real travesty is that the states are so ill-equipped to solve their own problems. where is the national guard? what are the governors doing to solve the problems?
What is the point of local government if it cannot deal with local problems?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real travesty Posted by: Afban
» RE: The real travesty Posted by: VZEQICVA
So....
Posted by: chuckjs on Jun 15, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FEDERAL govt. takes the LOCAL STATE militias(National Guard) over to Iraq to fight a FEDERAL war. Then they try and convince people that the LOCAL STATE has the resources to combat LOCAL disasters without FEDERAL help, even though the FEDERAL govt has usurped their largest line of LOCAL STATE defense(National Guard).

I can't wait to hear the right-wing talking points trying to properly explain how the FEDERAL govt. has said "I am taking your best disaster fighting resources away and you can have second rate, inaddequate help, if any help at all, in return.

I truly hope you folks in Iowa don't get stuck with the toxic FEMA trailers to help you out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]