Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Innovative Solar Power Outfit eSolar Signs First Deal for Utility-Scale Solar Plants

Posted by David Roberts, Huffington Post at 4:13 PM on June 10, 2008.


One step closer to a renewable energy economy.
esolar
esolar

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Environment in your
mailbox!

 

grist.org

In the transition to a clean, green economy, one milestone promises to be the most symbolically powerful. It's the one adopted as an official target by Google: renewable energy cheaper than coal, or RE<C. When it announced its campaign, Google also announced the recipients of its initial investments.

One was eSolar, a Pasadena, Calif.-based company spun off from business incubator Idealab. "Our view of what it takes to make solar power viable and a widespread technology," says Robert Rogan, eSolar's executive VP of corporate development, "is to be able to compete with fossil fuel energy prices in an unsubsidized way." Cheaper than coal per-kwh, without subsidies, by 2012: that's the aspiration.

How will they do it? The company has designed a new kind of utility-scale solar power plant. Solar thermal plants are huge arrays of mirrors that harness the sun's heat to drive steam turbines and create electricity. New solar thermal companies are thick on the ground in the California desert, but eSolar claims some distinct advantages.

eSolar's plants are designed to overcome some of the primary hurdles facing the solar sector, namely price, speed, and scalability. The core strategy is, as the company puts it, to replace "expensive steel, concrete, and brute force with inexpensive computing power and elegant algorithms." Rather than large, complex heliostats that must be precision-engineered on site by specialized laborers and equipment, they designed heliostats made of small, simple, prefabricated parts that can be cheaply shipped and quickly assembled, with minimal skilled labor. (Think Ikea.)

Because the heliostats are low to the ground, using lots of small, flat mirrors rather than a few large parabolic mirrors, they require far less steel and concrete to anchor them. Solar thermal heliostats can be up to 100 square meters, but eSolar's "are closer to a square meter," Rogan says. "They're really human-sized."

Efficiency is maximized by a computerized tracking system, with sensors and semiconductors doing the work bulk once did. (As Idealab's Bill Gross said at the Fortune conference, computing power is the one commodity that's getting cheaper.)

So eSolar boasts cheap capital and labor costs, but perhaps the most interesting angle is modularity. The plants are built in 33MW units that cover 160 acres each (1/4 of a square mile). This gives eSolar access to smaller, cheaper, more marginal sites, allowing them to fit plants near existing transmission rather than requiring new lines. "This is more distributed than your typical central station power plant," says Rogan. "Given any large load center, it's possible to build multiple modules at different interconnection points around that load center, as opposed to one single very large facility at one grid interconnected point." The company says it's already secured the rights to enough land to produce 1GW.

eSolar may be at the center of a hype storm, but it isn't pie in the sky. It announced $130 million in funding from Google and others earlier this year, and just last week it announced its first power purchase agreement (PPA), a deal with Southern California Edison for 245MW, coming online in 2011.

Solar thermal is almost certainly going to be a huge player in 21st century energy, and one or two of the companies springing up now will make the transition to serious multinational scale. Time will tell whether eSolar is an eToys (a previous Idealab venture) or an eBay, but if buzz and investor enthusiasm are any guide, the future looks pretty bright.

Leftovers:

Is eSolar looking into storage? "Our technology is capable of employing thermal storage," says Rogan. "We aren't discussing our specific storage plans at this time. We're open to all options." Could units smaller than 33MW conceivably be built using this technology? "Because we still need power plant equipment such as a turbine, at some point those economics become challenging, the smaller you get." Will eSolar be lobbying Calif. state gov't for better solar policy? "I couldn't speculate on that." Is there more to the Google partnership than funding? "Google made a corporate investment in eSolar." Will they buy some eSolar power? "I can't comment on anything else with regard to Google. They made a corporate investment ... You are asking the good questions." [eyebrow raise] A price on carbon isn't exactly a "subsidy" for solar power -- when you say you'll break even with coal without subsidies, are you assuming a carbon price? "Our goal is to be competitive without subsidies in the future." OK then. Are you shopping your technology around internationally? "We're considering projects all over the place." Do you plan on staying in the U.S. despite more favorable policy environment abroad? "We're definitely planning on building a lot of power projects in the U.S."

Digg!

Tagged as: energy, business, solar


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
coal subsidies
Posted by: mwildfire on Jun 10, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems like they ducked the question of whether solar can compete with coal without "subsidies," specifically a price on carbon. But realistically, coal is enormously subsidized. It's not just the damage to the climate; coal burning also emits mercury and SOX and NOX, which kill and maim thousands of people every year--these people pay the costs themselves, in a very personal way--the cost is not tallied to coal. yet the province of Ontario did calculations suggesting that the price in health is so high, it was cheaper to SHUT DOWN THEIR EXISTING COAL-FIRED PLANTS, because the province pays for its citizens' health care. This does not take into account the damage from the dumping of coal ash to water supplies, nor the enormous damage caused by mining--not done in Ontario--nor the damage from trucks weighing 120,000 pounds careening down mountain roads. If coal-fired plants had to pay the full price of their product, they'd be shut down and we'd be building wind and solar plants at ten times the current speed. So if we're going to talk about subsidies, we need to take all the subsidies currently enjoyed by the coal industry, most of them indirect. And if we're going to talk about how much land a solar or wind facility takes up, for a mere 35 MW or whatever, we need to take into account that while a 600 MW coal plant sits on a much smaller property, that plant needs endless shipments of coal, torn from mountains here in West Virginia in a way that destroys them permanently.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent points Posted by: PaulC
Coal & Elelctric
Posted by: dayenta on Jun 10, 2008 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work for an electric company that burns coal. They are trying to get the customers to voluntarily pick up the cost of developing alternative energy by saying it's "more expensive" to generate the alternatives. What a crock. Very few of them have signed on. By the way, I make 1.018% of the CEO's salary. Bring back the guillotine!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solar projects
Posted by: Dboy on Jun 10, 2008 6:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good to see these solar projects happening; will get production up and prices down, allowing people who are more interested in off-grid applications to eventually be able to afford these systems. Hope to see announcements on true 'community' solar projects and improvements in battery tech and photovoltaic efficiency. I hear that Austin Texas is becoming a solar city....guess these high energy prices aren't ALL bad:-)

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Although it . . .
Posted by: Scientz on Jun 11, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . hasn't gotten much attention, this article has more more excited than the recent Obama hype. (And I'm an Obama-acolyte, misunderstood "America won't elect a Muslim" jokes aside).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great news about eSolar... take a look at some other major solar developments
Posted by: channing on Jun 11, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
eSolar has tackled the "scalable utility" model by innovating Ikea-type modularity, lowering costs, reducing heavy infrastructure requirements, and thereby opening the door for a solar power plant coming to a town near you...

How about something scalable to the roof of your house and at a cost/kwh superior to coal even without including the severe health costs associated with coal mentioned upthread? See NanoSolar's exciting site announcing their new plant for producing, in their words,

"Nanosolar has developed proprietary process technology that makes it possible to produce 100x thinner solar cells 100x faster."

They've just been awarded the single largest "Solar America" contract by the DoE, and have been joined by many major companies.

So let's say the US is finally ready to take solar on in a big way, what does that do for China and the rest?

Trecers is leading the way into the permanent sustainable, clean energy future connecting Solar Deserts through High Tension Grids on an intercontinental scale... from their site,

"His Royal Highness Prince Hassan bin Talal of Jordan, former president of The Club of Rome, presented a White Paper (PDF, 2,5 MB) by TREC about the DESERTEC Concept to the European Parliament at 28 November 2007."

...and their "10,000 SOLAR GIGAWATTS" White Paper presented at the Hanover Fair in April '08.

We are at the beginning of an irreversible renewable energy future that cannot be monopolized.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]