Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McClellan: White House Officials Blocked Intelligence Report, ‘Continue To Bury Their Heads In The Sand'

Posted by Ali Frick, Think Progress at 8:35 AM on June 10, 2008.


More revelations a day late and a dollar short from McClellan.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Suzanne Braun Levine SuzanneBraunLevine.com

Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
Amanda Think Progress

Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

Yesterday, former press secretary Scott McClellan appeared on MSNBC’s Countdown to discuss last week’s Senate Intelligence Report, which found that the White House “built the public case for war against Iraq by exaggerating available intelligence and by ignoring disagreements among spy agencies about Iraq’s weapons programs and Saddam Hussein’s links to al Qaeda.” McClellan accused White House officials of having their “heads in the sand” and said they tried to block the committee’s investigation:

The White House never wanted to have the way the case was made, the way the intelligence was used to sell the war to the American people looked into by Congress. This was delayed for quite some time and Senator Rockefeller pushed this forward to get to the truth. And, the White House can continue to bury their heads in the sand but the reality is still the same.

I think the American people see it for exactly what it is. … We came to the very same conclusion that the intelligence was used in a way to make the threat sound more grave and urgent and serious than it was.

Before January 2007, the Senate Intelligence Committee was headed by Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), who used his position to delay, block, and stonewall the release of Phase II of the report:

“That [the Phase II report] is basically on the back burner.” [UPI, 3/10/05]

“I don’t think there should be any doubt that we have now heard it all regarding prewar intelligence. I think that it would be a monumental waste of time to replow this ground any further.” [U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 3/31/05]

“To go though that exercise, it seems to me, in a post-election environment - we didn’t see how we could do that and achieve any possible progress. I think everybody pretty well gets it.” [U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 3/31/05]

Current Chairman John Rockefeller (D-WV) said the committee faced “constant” pressure from Vice President Cheney to delay the report, and Roberts and his allies went “along with the administration.”

Digg!

Tagged as: intelligence, wmd, iraq


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lies of Omission are Still Lies - Exaggerations are Lies
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Jun 10, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
built the public case for war against Iraq by exaggerating available intelligence and by ignoring disagreements among spy agencies about Iraq’s weapons programs and Saddam Hussein’s links to al Qaeda

Think about the boastful exaggerator we all know in our lives, do we not think of this person as a liar since they make statements which they know are not true?

None of the disagreements among the spy agencies were ever presented by the government to the people. Here the Bush administration committed lies of omission.

They lied repeatedly, period.

Impeach the son of a bitch and his cohorts and send them to jail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How is this NOT an impeachable offense?
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 10, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(rhetorical question)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Permanent campaign mode"
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jun 11, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is a phrase McClellan keeps repeating as though invading Iraq was some kind of protracted campaign strategy for the GOP. Sorry, I'm not buying it.

The imperialistic agenda of the Bush administration has more to do with consolidating power and wealth in the hands of the corporatocracy regardless of their political affiliations. (Although it could certainly be argued that most of the beneficiaries of his criminal actions are called "Republicans".)

This administration knows no "party", only "domination". These ass-wipes have hijacked the GOP to pad their coffers with ill-gotten gains. Bush's PRIMARY allegiance is to the Skull and Bones club, as evidenced by the oath they take to become members.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And one more thing...
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jun 11, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hear people say: "Why didn't McClellan challenge the president in relation to the doubts he was having at the time?"

Yeah, right. All the kings horses and all the kings men have done precious little to challenge the idiot-in-chief's destructive and dishonest policies. Can anyone say it was the press secretary's job to do so?

Of course he should have resigned at the time but let me ask how many people keep their mouths shut on the job when they should really speak up in order to keep said job? Happens all the time, every day, every minute. The people I can't forgive are our elected officials who won a majority in Congress and have done nothing to stop this maniac.

At least McClellan has the guts to finally come forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

they need to wait till this crime syndicate is away from the nuclear button...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 12, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and then go after the lot, and investigate completely, and throw the book at them ALL!

I remember Bush43 saying to reporters [when he was Governor of Texas] while a convicted Murderer was put to death, that he "BELIEVED" in the judicial process and wouldn't interfere...
he sat in the Governors Mansion while becoming the governor overseeing the most executions EVER in US HISTORY... and his conscience is clear?

maybe if he had a conscience!
this man his policies and presidency needs to be investigated from top to bottom but only once he is out of office!

his whole sordid political LIFE
IS LIES LIES LIES!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]