Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Why Won't the Press Call Bush a Liar?
Why is the press still reluctant to tell the truth about George W. Bush's run up to war -- that is a bald-faced liar who deliberately lied to the very Americans he's supposed to serve because he wanted to get into a war that he thought would give him a Great Legacy™ and fatten the pockets of himself and his cronies in the bargain?
Now that the report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has come out, this is no longer the exclusive province of bloggers and "kooks." It is absolute truth, that this president betrayed the trust of the American people in a way no other president has done in my lifetime -- not even Nixon. And yet, as he plays out the string of his ghastly, destructive, miserable presidency, the press still won't call him a liar.
Today's headlines:
"Inflated." "Misused." "Overstated." "Exaggerated." Even the report refuses to use "The L Word":
“Representing to the American people that the two had an operational partnership and posed a single, indistinguishable threat was fundamentally misleading and led the nation to war on false premises,”
Let's not surgarcoat it: This president is a liar. A shameless bold-face liar. And that is to our eternal shame.
Tagged as: bush, media, iraq, lies, propoganda
| Also in Media and Technology | |||
| Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch They're all inter-related, you know. Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009. |
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper This is one contorted excuse. Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009. |
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever' Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit! Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009. |
|