Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama Backs Lieberman Against the Wall

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 4:21 AM on June 5, 2008.


The Senators exchanged some intense words on the Senate floor.
liebermanobama

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Joe Lieberman, fully embracing his role as a Republican attack dog, took the lead in a GOP conference call this morning to attack Barack Obama’s Middle East policy. On the call, organized by far-right Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), Lieberman argued, weakly, that Obama holds the U.S. responsible for Iran’s strength in the region.

“Senator Obama argued today that American foreign policy in recent years has essentially sort of strengthened Iran,” Lieberman said, adding, “If Israel is in danger today, it’s not because of American foreign policy, which has been strongly supportive of Israel in every way. It’s not because of what we’ve done in Iraq, it’s because Iran is a fanatical terrorist expansionist state.”

Obama, apparently, didn’t care for Lieberman’s comments, so much so that the Democratic presidential nominee confronted Lieberman directly on the Senate floor this afternoon. Subscription-only Roll Call reported:

[D]uring a Senate vote Wednesday, Obama dragged Lieberman by the hand to a far corner of the Senate chamber and engaged in what appeared to reporters in the gallery as an intense, three-minute conversation.

While it was unclear what the two were discussing, the body language suggested that Obama was trying to convince Lieberman of something and his stance appeared slightly intimidating.

Using forceful, but not angry, hand gestures, Obama literally backed up Lieberman against the wall, leaned in very close at times, and appeared to be trying to dominate the conversation, as the two talked over each other in a few instances.

Now, as far as I know, this wasn’t an entirely forceful confrontation, and the two reportedly “patted each other on the back” after their discussion. Reporters apparently peered over the edge of the press gallery wall to watch the disagreement, prompting Obama to smile and point up at the reporters. (I mention this because I don’t want to suggest Obama was about to smack Lieberman around.)

But it’s also the kind of anecdote that reminds us that Barack Obama is not afraid to push back against those attacking him.

I don’t imagine he changed Lieberman’s mind, and I seriously doubt Lieberman will think twice before attacking Obama again.

But I’m encouraged anyway. Lieberman needs to be backed up against a wall more often. Besides, as Roll Call reported, “Obama loyalists were quick to express their frustration with Lieberman’s decision and warned that if he continues to take a lead role in attacking Obama it could complicate his professional relationship with the Caucus.”

As for the substance of Lieberman’s criticism, Sam Stein reported:

The crux of Lieberman’s argument, however, was that Obama was putting the blame for Iran’s rise in the Middle East on America’s doorstep, pushing the argument that the Iraq war had strengthened Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s standing in the region and left Israel left secure.

“If Israel is in danger today it is not because of us foreign policy, which has been strongly supportive of Israel in every way,” he said. “It is not because of what we have done in Iraq. It is because Iran is a fanatical, terrorist, expansionist state and has a leader and a leadership that constantly threatens to extinguish the state of Israel.”

The remarks fit into a traditional GOP rallying cry, that the Democrats have a blame-America-first mentality. But there are outstanding factors that could muddle Lieberman’s message. For starters, most objective metrics indicate that Iran has, in fact, been strengthened by America’s involvement in Iraq. The Persian nation, after all, has increasingly meddled in Iraqi affairs.

But also, McCain, despite tough rhetoric on Iran, has several advisers with deep connections to the country; perhaps the most embarrassing of which is Charlie Black, the campaign’s chief strategist. Before leaving his perch as a D.C. lobbyist, Black represented a Chinese oil company that did business with the Iranian government. He and his firm also represented Ahmad Chalabi, the Iraqi exile who helped churn up support for the war in the United States and has subsequently been accused of selling U.S. secrets to Iran.

I wonder if Obama brought any of this up.

Digg!

Tagged as: israel, lieberman, obama


Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
LIEberman poses a Serious Threat to OUR national Security
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 5, 2008 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LIEberman is not only a Traitor to the Dem party, AND Our Counbtry he is a traitor to his own people in the Jewish Community.
This vile disgusting excuse for a Human backs such Sociopaths as Hagee who not only slipped when he revealed his true hatred of the Jewish people with His 'Hitler' comment. He has Preached Repeatedly that to Iniitate the Psychotic "rapture" the U.S must preemptively strike Iran to porvoke retaliation by Russia & China, Thus beginnning 'Armegeddon' . What makes LIEberman a traitor is that ONLY Christians who follow Hagee will be 'Rapture' - Jews Must Convert to be 'SAVED'!!!! LIEberman KNOWS THIS and has the Audacity to compare Hagee to Moses as a 'man of God'!!
lIEberman is No Friend to Dems, Real Republicans/Independents, The American People, The Isreali or ALL of Mankind- He is a 'Deceiver' and an agent for that which works to destroy mankind!Who Does He Serve...."Could It Be Satan???" Heretic and a criminal against Humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's skinny, but he's TOUGH! Yes!
Posted by: wagadog on Jun 5, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama 08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

:)
Posted by: Scientz on Jun 5, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . I hope to read more of these in the coming months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

After he was done with Lieberman,
Posted by: sui_generis on Jun 5, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama was heard to turn to McCain and say, "Now who's next? YOU want some, Old Man?!"



; )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: After he was done with Lieberman, Posted by: the man with a dog
Predicting More Disappointing Behavior...
Posted by: Xynyx on Jun 5, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's lots of time for Lieberman to prove to be even MORE disappointing than he has already been. At least, in that regard, he is consistent.

I've said it before...

He could hand the Senate to the Republicans at any time, now... but he's holding his cards closely because he wants to make sure he has a position of influence in whatever Administration follows.

If the Democrats had any spine whatsoever, they'd force him to play his hand, suffer the consequences, then shitcan him after securing the Presidency and a majority in the Senate. The man is a worthless dog. If you show him your leg, he WILL bite it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting Glimpse
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jun 5, 2008 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a reminder that these people talk to each other all the time - it's their job.

Of course, we all wonder what was really said. The Dems can't kick Lieberman out without losing their "control" of the Senate, so they'll suffer along until the last minute. Was Obama reminding Joe that there's a limit?

Remember: Congress IS a conspiracy, a perfectly legal one, and most of it never gets on C-SPAN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally!!!!!
Posted by: outlander55 on Jun 6, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Democrat that doesn't hide his head in the sand!!! Maybe, just maybe this will start a trend. Obama 08!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If there was any doubt before
Posted by: nomomorons on Jun 6, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one can claim tht he's lacking in leadership! Talk about Day One!! The DNC is now adhering to Obama policy re. PAC money, and Joe Lieberman has (finally) been reminded that he's wearing the Democratic label and he's expected to honor that.

And now for Day Two!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I look forward to Nov. 5th, 2008...
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 6, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when the Democrats in the Senate can take Joe Lieberman into a corner on the Senate floor and tell him that he's being thrown out of the Party... and let him slink over to the LOSER side of the aisle, where he belongs.

He's a traitor, plain and simple. He needs to run for a seat on the Knesset.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He Would have been V.P. had Gore won.
Posted by: garry minor on Jun 6, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wonder why the Democratic party had this man in mind for our V.P. in 2000. This smells really bad!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Man! I sure wish I could have been a fly on THAT wall!
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jun 6, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack is making a great beginning as our nominee.

LIEberman is due to join the lobbyists as EX-influential.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO WHY DID OBAMA CAMPAIGN FOR LIEBERMAN?
Posted by: bbfmail on Jun 6, 2008 4:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama, not only campaigned for Lieberman against an anti-war candidate, but asked that other Democrats do so also. He had already requested that Lieberman be his mentor when he got to the US Senate. What happened? Guess he no longer needed Lieberman as he no longer needed Rev. Wright, Pfleger, or the Trinity Church. Thank goodness he hasn't abandoned Mr. "I wish we could have bombed more places" Ayers......yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

movie buff
Posted by: daniel w vermillion on Jun 6, 2008 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama made LIEberman an offer he can't refuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lieberman is no Democrat...
Posted by: Tombo on Jun 6, 2008 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and he is a complete liar, swindler, and opportunist. His statement that "“Senator Obama argued today that American foreign policy in recent years has essentially sort of strengthened Iran. If Israel is in danger today, it’s not because of American foreign policy, which has been strongly supportive of Israel in every way. It’s not because of what we’ve done in Iraq, it’s because Iran is a fanatical terrorist expansionist state.”

These people need to get their heads out of each others asses long enough for a dose of reality. If you tke his statement and turn it on his head then you would be approaching the truth of the situation. We have got to stop placating and genuflecting to the Israeli lobby before our country tears itself apart as it tears the rest of the world apart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

liam99
Posted by: liam99 on Jun 6, 2008 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey lieberman and other righties. Guess what? YOU ARE NOT AMERICA! We blame george bush and cheney, and mccain and lieberman and you are NOT America. You are ANTI-AMERICA with your wars and torture, and corruption and lies etc..
You attack and are attempting to destroy everything good about America. YOU ARE NOT AMERICA! When we blame you WE ARE NOT BLAMING AMERICA, we are BLAMING YOU!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kick Lieberman Out of the Democratic Party Once and for all
Posted by: Trainer12 on Jun 9, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Leiberman doesn't change his registration to Republican, let us force his hand. He has already endorced McCain. He votes with the Republicans, he talks and sounds like a Republican. He might as well change his registration and caucus with them. Good riddance!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]