Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

McCain's Infidelity Haunts Him on the Trail

Posted by Cliff Schecter, Firedoglake at 11:35 AM on June 4, 2008.


The culture war flips on McCain.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

As you'll see in the video to the right, from a town hall meeting in Nashville, Tennessee Monday, mixed in with platitudes about gay marriage, we get a nice little comment from this questioner on the sanctity of marriage in McCain's life--or more to the point, sanctimony. Here is a rough transcript of her question to The Morally Righteous One, which comes at the beginning of the video (it includes McCain's answer to this question and a previous on on Hillary Clinton):

My second and final question, you talk a lot about the character issue...and...like you, um, I was opposed to gay marriage, I was in always in favor of civil unions but the basic definition of marriage....but, then I get to thinking, that is based on what we consider to be the sanctity of marriage. There is nothing....you see long-term couples splitting up, it's, it's just crazy...I know that you, your own situation, you're going to have to address that in the campaign. Infidelity is just a terrible cancer on this country....and I think if we're going to talk about...gay marriage, it has to be in the context of the preservation of marriage...which I just don't see it, I think we need to make it more difficult for people to get married, or whatever we need to do..if that's...if we're going to be consistent.

McCain ignored that part of the question, of course.

h/t Mike Rogers for providing the video

Update: From The Real McCain:

Arriving back in the United States in 1973, McCain faced not only his own lingering injuries but also those that his wife had sustained in an automobile accident in 1969. After nine months of intensive physical therapy, he was reinstated to flight status. While stationed in Jacksonville, Florida, he was instrumental in turning around the performance of a Corsair squadron.

His marriage did not recover so well. McCain has admitted to “selfishness and immaturity” and has attributed the breakup of his marriage to his own misdeeds. He has even gone out of his way to exempt Vietnam from any blame. “The blame was entirely mine,” he said.

McCain had already met and romanced, while still married to Shepp, the woman who would be his second wife — Cindy Lou Hensley, seventeen years his junior, the only child of a wealthy Anheuser-Busch distributor from Phoenix.10 Cindy’s father, Jim Hensley, had been a World War II pilot, shot down over the English Channel. In 1955 he formed his company, Hensley & Co., now the country’s sixth-largest beer distributorship. Cindy had gone from cheerleader to rodeo queen to graduate student at University of South Carolina by the time she met McCain in 1979. A year later, McCain and his first wife were granted a divorce; six weeks later, McCain married Cindy.

Update II: It just occurred to me, as this was in Tennessee, where the local GOP has been attacking Barack Obama's wife in ads, that perhaps someone might ask McCain to address whether he respected "the sanctity of marriage" enough to demand that his local party stop attacking his opponent's wife.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
McCain is lying like a Persian Rug to America..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jun 4, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A man that lies to his wife will lie to his fellow American even more effortlessly..

McCain is lying like "a Persian rug" to America but the causes of the Oil and Gas prices and market manipulation and his chief economic adviser Phil Gramm is most responsible for it..

That's why America should divorce itself from this two faced lying SOB..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I commend this "values" voter....
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 4, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a gay man I commend this woman for taking on the hypocrisy of the politically expedient tactic of dumping everything that has gone wrong in the heterosexual world on gays.... without engaging in honest self reflection about what is happening in the straight world. If you are going to slam same sex marriage....fine....but if you want to open that door...then it's fair to examine how you might have re-defined the institution of marriage yourself with multiple marriages/adulteries and trophy wives.

From this video clip, McCain was in no mood to engage in such self-reflection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain/Clinton
Posted by: Artkansas on Jun 4, 2008 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a dream team. And she's already used to infidelity. ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain/Clinton Posted by: johnbradleycopeland
Alternet Double Standard
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jun 5, 2008 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does McCain's "infidelity" get attention over Obama's admitted cocaine use?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How about infidelity vs. honesty Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» Double Standard? Posted by: xenocyd
» RE: Alternet Double Standard Posted by: av8rdave
» RE: Alternet Double Standard Posted by: omatravel
» RE: Alternet Double Standard Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» God hates divorce! Posted by: garry minor
» RE: Alternet Double Standard Posted by: opalescentscales
» RE: Alternet Double Standard Posted by: VZEQICVA
Alternet Double Standard - Part 2
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jun 5, 2008 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aren't you the same liberals who cried foul about the media's unfair assault against Bill Clinton's sexual escapade with Monica Lewinsky? Why all of the sudden is the circumstance different for John McCain?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alternet Double Standard - Part 2 Posted by: E PLURIBUS UNUM
» RE: Alternet Double Standard - Part 2 Posted by: The_Curmudgeon
All of the Sudden?
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Jun 5, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see. When Clinton was having his affair(s) Huffpo didn't exist. Fact check, buddy.

Then, let's note that YOU are interested in the general public not being aware of the facts with respect to the WELL KNOWN affair of John McCain.

You stated that it shouldn't matter. Really? Just like McCain's campaign, you are engaging us in a campaign of obfuscation. Are all of your friends like that, too?

Then, there's the very important facts involved here that you carefully ignored. Carefully IGNORED. John McCain tells everyone about the importance of marriage fidelity. Hypocrite. John McCain backs an amendment to his state Constitution to PREVENT marriages. By gay people. That's called codifying discrimination. DISCRIMINATION. John McCain also backs bastardizing the US Constitution to do the same thing. That document is used as the foundation of the smooth running of government. It is not used to engineer current events. Note: the last time it was used to engineer society (the 18th amendment) a REPEAL had to be then written into it later. Mistake.

Your argument is a waste of time. Your appeal is to an entirely different electorate now. This is the 21st century, not the 18th. I suggest living with the rest of us during this election cycle. Oh, and that Constitution you think you understand? I suggest you read it at least one time to know what it contains. Because I can tell you have never read it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All of the Sudden? Posted by: JamieC
His private life is not our business
Posted by: seamallowance on Jun 5, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do I see a double-standard here? Whatever problems someone has in their marital relations is none of our business; it has nothing to do with how someone runs a country. We need to keep our nose out of the private affairs of politicians, even if they happen to be a creepy Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But is he being blackmailed? Posted by: KeepsonTickn
victrola
Posted by: victrola on Jun 5, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cindy, Your hubby rode to fame and fortune riding your stiletto heels. Dump him!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leequinn
Posted by: leequinnn on Jun 5, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's interesting is what the candidates are saying to this question:

Should an affair outside of marriage disqualify a candidate for public office?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I could care less.
Posted by: steven w on Jun 5, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not worried about other people's sex life. Just because the Republicans come up with this kind of crap does not mean I have to use the same tactics. If you want to concentrate on what is wrong with the man, just stick to the issues. I can assure you there is plenty THERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I could care less. Posted by: xenocyd
» RE: I could care less. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I could care less. Posted by: Sissy
» RE: I could care less. Posted by: momly
Frankly, I wouldn't wipe my butt on trash like this.
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 5, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no intention whatever of voting for John McCain or supporting him in any way, but this is gossip, the kind of scum-sucking tripe that we have been inflicted with ever since the dawn of feminism and tabloid "news." A nation that rules itself on the basis of garbage like this deserves just what it must inevitably get.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» For non-feminist gossip.... Posted by: morticia
Look, there is a
Posted by: steven w on Jun 5, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lot more to worry about moralistically than sex. How about the morals of allowing porporations to do whatever the hell they want to do. The morals of continuing in an unnecessary war. The morals of a crooked campaign financing and lobbying. Him having sex with somebody does not affect my life. Stop being so Puritanical. Why do people worry so much about other people having sex? It's none of my business. My busines is trying to find someone for pres. who will have an administration that is smarter than I am.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Look, there is a Posted by: VZEQICVA
hypocrasy-morals-president
Posted by: 60sretread on Jun 5, 2008 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain's infidelity is relevant-not because infidelity itself is relevant but when you condemn behavior in others that you practice that sheds light on character and fitness for the job. I prefer Presidents who are honest as I am sure hundreds of thousands of Iraquis would echo if they could. Previous candidate who got smacked down for hypocrasy Gary Hart D who asked the press to follow him around to checkhis fidelity AND THEY DID. the end....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C. Livingston
Posted by: C the B on Jun 5, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plain and simple. He's a hypocrite, not to mention a dishonest. You can't just talk about the sanctity of marriage while your cheating on your wife and not be called on it. The term that fits best would be SCUMBAG.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John McCain's ethics are situational
Posted by: nomomorons on Jun 5, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like sooooo many self-righteous, judgemental, elitists, John believes his "sins" are less immoral than those of people un-like him. Infidelity is ok because he was unfaithful; homosexuality is not ok because he is not homosexual. Lack of empathy? Or lack of Christian spirit? Of just plain mean?

Remember, this is the man who "hates" war but is willing to wage it force people to be like him.

He seems more and more like Dr Strangelove with each passing day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abuse is important, divorce is not
Posted by: Hans B on Jun 5, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A marriage doesn't work, there's some infidelity, there's a divorce. Ho hum, who cares.

Or: a man is abusive of his first wife, disloyal when she most needs him, he plays around with other women and finally marries the richest among them, who he proceeds to abuse. Now that would be important.

Just as it should have been important, in 2000, that Bush gleefully smirked when talking of executions he could have stopped, or that he tortured animals when adolescent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe They were Swingers
Posted by: gellero1 on Jun 5, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You degrade yourself writing about this peccadillo from 35 years ago. He snagged a trophy bride. So what

It's like kindergarten..........nanannanana..........you did it to..........I'm gonna tell.........

MSM BS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe They were Swingers Posted by: VZEQICVA
Equal Time for McSame
Posted by: Magginkat on Jun 6, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mystery Solver asked ......

Aren't you the same liberals who cried foul about the media's unfair assault against Bill Clinton's sexual escapade with Monica Lewinsky? Why all of the sudden is the circumstance different for John McCain?


We just want to give him equal time sonny!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain and Able
Posted by: FURonnie on Jun 6, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think this guy McCain has no personal integrity take a look on the net at the Keating Five articles. (He was one of them and Keating was his buddy who got him elected.) His corrupt affiliation cost the good ol' patriotic Americans Billions of taxpayer dollars. He hosed us before and he'll hose us again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]