Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

China Surpasses U.S. in Technological Prowess

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 10:17 AM on May 26, 2008.


Did we outsource our edge?
walmartchinabig
walmart

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

For years, folks like Thomas Friedman and Robert Samuelson have dismissed concerns about our dwindling manufacturing base as just so much economic fear mongering. We don't need those dirty manufacturing jobs, they said. There's more value added in services, and with our educated workforce and technological edge, there's no reason in the world not to have other countries build our play-stations, bikes and TVs.

The only problem is that the manufacturing sector has always been a key driver of technological innovation. When manufacturing goes, so does a large share of hi-tech R and D. Now, according to Manufacturing and Technology News, we appear to be reaping what the corporate globalizers have sown:

China has surpassed the United States in a key measure of high tech competitiveness. The Georgia Institute of Technology's bi-annual "{High-Tech Indicators" finds that China improved its "technological standing" by 9 points over the period of 2005 to 2007, with the United States and Japan suffering declines of 6.8 and 7.1 respectively. In Georgia Tech's scale of one to 100, China's technological standing now rests at 82.8, compared to the U.S. at 76.1. The United States peaked at 95.4 in 1999. China has increased from 22.5 in 1996 to 82.8 in 2007.

"The message speaks out pretty loudly," says Alan Porter, co-director of Georgia Tech's Technology Policy and Assessment Center, which produces the benchmark. "I think the prospects are pretty scary."

"In areas like nanotechnology, China now leads the United States in published articles, but what scares me is China is getting better at marrying that research to their low-cost productive processes," says Porter. "When you put those together with our buzzword of innovation, China is big, they're tough and cheap. Again, where is our edge?"

We had it, but we shipped it off to China, content to sell one another real estate, sue each other and manufacture only green pieces of paper to trade for oil and cheap knick-knacks at Wal-Mart.

****

PS: What's that, you don't read Manufacturing and Technology News" I do, so you don't have to. You can just sign up for my weekly Corporate Accountability and Workplace newsletter. If you're not digging into the special coverage areas -- all of them -- then you're missing out on a lot of content.

Digg!

Tagged as: technology, china, trade, outsourcing, manufacturing

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Cheney Looks Awkward as Pelosi Interrupts Him to Applaud Obama's Victory
Vice President Cheney stood before Congress and read the official results of the 2008 presidential election. It's now officially official.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC, and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A nation on the move
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on May 26, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was there last summer and again over christmas. Every city block has new buildings going up or new renovations going on.

What was sad to see were the old homeless people that at one time were nourished from Mao's iron rice bowl. They have been left behind and abandoned. Luckily there are people like my fiancee who always manage to spare a few Yuan to buy these poor souls a bowl of rice or a blanket.

Even sadder was rolling down a Chinese highway, and seeing where the Communists had planted trees to keep people from being able to see the psychedelic rainbow water of a polluted factory town, pipes belching an orange/green (yes, orange/green, simultaneously) solution into the river.

China may be on the move, but until the communists learn to develop responsibly, they will be in for some hard times and a sharp jump in cancer cases.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A nation on the move Posted by: donl51
Our Corporations are Treasonous they Abandoned and Betrayed America...
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 26, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our corporations didn't outsource American jobs the Abandoned and Betrayed America..

I've been writing about the bleeding out of American Military Technology and dual use technology and it had only gotten worse and worse over the last few years..

Our corporations are for the most part committing treason and in the 21st Century Technology is superiority and superiority is domination and just wait until Red China has all it wants from these treasonous corporations and then turns on them as the Red Dragon consumes them their assets their holdings their comparative advantage...

They sold their souls they did these unbridled capitalists traitors, "free traitors" will be America's ruin and end along with those corrupt treasonous usurpers who have also been destroying America from within such as The Federalist Society..et al..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No mention Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: No mention Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: No mention JOHN DAVID STUTZ Posted by: Bobby Decker
» Cutlas Supremes Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» and I should mention Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: No mention Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
hate media
Posted by: Lauren on May 26, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Josh, what happened to the comments?

http://www.alternet.org/immigration/86302/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I thought China stole our technology!
Posted by: carbon-based on May 26, 2008 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I for one feel our government should have intervened and to ensure our manufacturing base stayed intact.

But more than that, Americans need to start forgoing price considerations, hard to do now that our economy is tanking, stay away from Walmart and buy American, where it can be found.

This issue is really up to Americans to change, not only our government.. We can't have it cheap and at home, at least for now.

China is the real enemy, not the Islamic nuts!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There ought to be a movement against nanotechnology
Posted by: daniel347x on May 27, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't have time to justify this, and I know the issue is complicated, but in general I think there ought to be at least an awareness of, if not a full-blown movement against, nanotechnology, as there is against genetically modified food and GMO's.

This seems not to be a part of almost any discussion in which nanotechnology is discussed; and it wasn't a part of this article, nor has this issue been raised in any of the responses.

Again, I don't have time to justify it or to debate with people who give 10 examples of valuable technological research into nanotechnology. Also, I'm well aware that the distinction between nanotechnology and not-nanotechnology is a grey area.

I can't be the spokesman for such a movement right now, and I don't have time right now to research the issues beyond what I know from my direct experience with nanotechnology as a physics professional, so I think the concepts need to be developed and evolved...But, when they are, my hunch tells me that we'll find it is important that there be a movement against nanotechnology.

Sorry that I won't have time to engage in any conversation or debate about this, but I just wanted to post this because there's been no mention of it.

Thanks,
Dan Nissenbaum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The main reasons for China's advances
Posted by: ciccio on May 27, 2008 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When a greedy manufacturer goes to China to have his product made by low cost labour, the first thing that China gains is the technology to make that product. The billions spent on R&D are handed to them on a plate, no charge. The reason China is the world leader in making cheap knock-offs of
every high priced item in the world is because in many instances they made the original product.
People seem to have forgotten that China is a communist dictatorship with a very large number of highly educated people working FOR THE STATE.
It is relatively easy to build on the foundation of the knowledge that is being given to them. All those happily profiting from the cheap labour today will sing a different song when they have to compete against a slightly better
product cheaper than their own but with a Chinese trade mark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The BIG Picture...
Posted by: dave1616 on May 27, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.discussrace.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, Mirabile Dictu!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 27, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this amazing?! Of course, there were those of us who started predicting this sort of thing in the late sixties and early seventies, about the time that the stupidity of our kids started to show - a short time (1964) after the population shift toward non-white, non-European in ancestry (seventy-one percent of U.S. names then were Germanic in origin) people began. This should also tell us why illegal immigration from Mexico is nationally cancerous, to say nothing of something about a dozen more issues in the news these days (things like the global warming debate), but it won't. If history teaches us anything, it's that we don't learn from history - or those stubborn facts of which our second president spoke. The stupidity of U.S. citizens isn't funny any longer - IS it?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ain't payback a bitch?
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 27, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
U.S. corporations rushed whole-hog into "globalization," supposedly for America's benefit, but actually to find the cheapest labor to help increase their rip-off of their customers; and now China is taking a page from that same economic textbook, and will use globalization - that is, of the REST of the globe - to kick our economic asses.

For too long, american corporations believed, in their arrogance, that they not only spanned the globe, they WERE the globe - and now they are going to find that there is a great big world out there that they, and the rest of us, soon will not be a part of.

Look in the collective mirror and say hello to America, a tottering giant on its way to becoming the world's largest banana republic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ain't payback a bitch? Posted by: Gnostic Newcomer
nice observation Josh
Posted by: Bearzerker on May 27, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with the loss of manufacturing so also goes the loss of innovation!

how true... we seem to be a nation of fat cats... to lazy to do for ourselves anymore...

our importance and influence in world events are already in decline, this report of yours shows us what the harbinger looks like and its not a nice picture now is it!

is it time to bow to our new masters now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We may become an economic backwater but the military force
Posted by: nightgaunt on May 27, 2008 2:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will make sure the USA (or what it mutates into) will still be making some impact even if the only innovations will be in killing,spying and subjugation of populations enslaved to produce food and cheap goods. Much of it will be right here. Boarder to boarder near slave laybor camps,maybe even corporate reservations where you live and die and are buried (or recycled) without ever leaving the razor-wire and mines. Unless you are tired of your life and end it quick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We've Wasted Our Money on Military Development
Posted by: FoonTheElder on May 27, 2008 4:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've wasted all of our research and development money on technical developments of military weapons. The rest of the world was busy developing the rest of their economies while the U.S. multi-nationals were busy in their race to the bottom of the wage scale so they export jobs and development.

At this point, I don't care where the company headquarters is located. All that should matter is whether they are providing long-term good paying jobs in the US. Most US multi-national craporations have consistently failed American workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repbulican Philosophy has reached its Goal
Posted by: james2021 on May 27, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just the end result of Republican Philosophy for the last 28 years. Do away with labor, and all the pesky demands for Health insurance, Pensions, Educational benefits, and ever higher wages. Eliminate all those pesky costs, and profits will zoom upward. Force the public to get scraps from the Government. Minimal health care, minimal social security, and Government Creamation.

We, as a nation, have allowed this to happen under our very noses.

One must be fair, Dumbya has probably done more damage then all the Presidents before him, and he thinks that he is the decider, that makes him right, no matter what ( The Devine right of Kings)

Guess we all deserve the extremely hard times coming for us and our descendants.

Welcome to the New Republican Dark Ages

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Am Shocked, Well I Had Never Even Considered, Well I Never...
Posted by: Turiye on May 28, 2008 12:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...perhaps I should have. WTF, of course they did. If we still consistantly(because we DO use and ABUSE undocumented workers)paid our workers such a low wage, poor work conditions, no human rights, dare I mention THEY F$$KING OWN US.
Geez Louise, we want to pay less, you all have gotten your wish. Now we have our dogs dieing or dead as well as our children dieing or dead due to the outlandish debt we owe China, shit. Sorry I had Some political thing on and again with the, "I think they misspoke...", SAY WHAT
YOU MEAN
Anyway this is something else the Murderer in Chief has allowed to happen, we owe them Trillions. Welcome the new Millenia of the Great Giant of Asia....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]