Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sistani Switching Sides in Iraq?

Posted by Spencer Ackerman, Attackerman at 9:59 AM on May 23, 2008.


The religious leader is issuing fatwas against American troops.
1064sistanisadr
sistani sadr

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Now, if you thought things couldn’t get worse in Iraq, think again.

Iraq’s most influential Shiite cleric has been quietly issuing religious edicts declaring that armed resistance against U.S.-led foreign troops is permissible — a potentially significant shift by a key supporter of the Washington-backed government in Baghdad.
The edicts, or fatwas, by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani suggest he seeks to sharpen his long-held opposition to American troops and counter the populist appeal of his main rivals, firebrand Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army militia.
Could it really be that bad? Why is Sistani doing this now? Both are good questions I can’t answer. Matt Duss takes a stab at it:
I think it’s possible that Sistani is responding to pressure from Sadrists who condemned him for his silence during the U.S. and Iraqi army siege of Sadr City. It’s also striking how closely the language of these edicts appears to accord with what Muqtada al-Sadr himself has advocated and prohibited in terms of resistance to foreign occupiers. Contrary to some reports, Sistani did not advocate the disbanding of the Mahdi Army, but rather simply did not rule on the question, effectively leaving the Mahdi Army intact. While Sistani may regard Sadr as an unruly upstart, Sistani also recognizes that Sadr represents a massive constituency that cannot be ignored.
My impression was that around late 2005, after Sadr mounted his first nonviolent clerical/political challenge to Sistani, Sistani backed away from the day-to-day of politics, recognizing that keeping a central role in the United Iraqi Alliance meant being blamed for its inability to govern. You need a lot more data than this AP story presents to develop a theory for why the fatwas are coming now, but perhaps Sistani is now facing the opposite extreme: irrelevance. I truly don’t know and all the DayQuil isn’t helping me understand.

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, muqtada al-sadr, ayatollah sistani, fatwas


Christmas Eve Marks the 3,000th Day of the War in Afghanistan, the 30th Anniversary of the Soviet Invasion
We need a drawdown of our forces across the country.
Post by Zaid Jilani. December 24, 2009.
ACORN Broke No Laws - Dems Still Threw Them Under the Bus
Loyalty. It's a two way street. And neither the White House, nor Congress, have shown any.
Post by Ian Welsh. December 24, 2009.
The Senate Deal May Be a Sh*t Sandwich, but If You're Hungry Enough ...
Maybe I'm missing something.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 24, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?