Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

US Military "Softened Up" Guantanamo Detainees for Chinese

Posted by Attaturk, Firedoglake at 2:19 PM on May 21, 2008.


Detainees were kept awake for long periods, deprived of food and forced to endure cold, just prior to questioning by Chinese interrogators.
guantanamo1206

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Suzanne Braun Levine SuzanneBraunLevine.com

Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
Amanda Think Progress

Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

The Chinese are apparently taking a supervisory role in overseeing their investment.

U.S. military personnel at Guantanamo Bay allegedly softened up detainees at the request of Chinese intelligence officials who had come to the island facility to interrogate the men -- or they allowed the Chinese to dole out the treatment themselves, according to claims in a new government report.

Buried in a Department of Justice report released Tuesday are new allegations about a 2002 arrangement between the United States and China, which allowed Chinese intelligence to visit Guantanamo and interrogate Chinese Uighurs held there.

According to the report by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine, an FBI agent reported a detainee belonging to China's ethnic Uighur minority and a Uighur translator told him Uighur detainees were kept awake for long periods, deprived of food and forced to endure cold for hours on end, just prior to questioning by Chinese interrogators.

Susan Manning, a lawyer who represents several Uighurs still held at Guantanamo, said Tuesday the allegations are all too familiar.

U.S. personnel "are engaging in abusive tactics on behalf of the Chinese," she said Tuesday. When Uighur detainees refused to talk to Chinese interrogators in 2002, U.S. military personnel put them in solitary confinement as punishment, she said.

"Why are we doing China's dirty work?" Manning said. "Surely we're better than that."

Ms. Manning are you forgetting who the President and Vice-President are? Sadly, it's par for the course.

This occurred during the period of time in which the Bush Administration was rife with people who took the belief that Muslim equaled possible terrorist. You know, like today.

But while Buddhist Tibet generates the headlines, the Uighur (or Uyghurs) are a less known, but no less repressed culture within China, located in a territory with the rather awkward "Mao-tastic" name of the "Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region" [which in fairness may just be chinese for "South Dakota"] in the far west of the country and bordering Afghanistan amongst other places. It is in Afghanistan where these individuals were swept up by American forces [along with many others who were not terrorists, but bounty-victims of various warlords taking advantage of American gullibility].

So via the Bush Administration and GITMO we've not only turned our back on the ideals we espouse for our own culture, but we've farmed ourselves out to be agents of another country's repression.

The Bush Administration, always the merde touch?

Digg!

Tagged as: guantanamo, china, torture


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
New book from an innocent man who spent 5 years in Guantanamo
Posted by: fanny666 on May 21, 2008 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How crazy have we become.
Posted by: carbon-based on May 21, 2008 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why on earth are we letting the Chinese in there anyway... It's the Chinese that are the real threat.. We will be at war with them within the next 20 years... US/Japan all over again.. We keep looking to the Arabs but it's China that is gearing up for a major confrontation, economically and militarily.

Is Obama ready to stand up once in office and say enough is enough... China is out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» umm, dude... Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: umm, dude... Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: How crazy have we become. Posted by: robert.noll
Getting Away With Murder
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 21, 2008 11:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's astounding and disheartening that our courts and Congress supinely allow Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft et al to get away with murder, literally. There have been dozens of deaths under torture by US officials, which is felony murder even if the intent was not to kill. Congress should hold open hearings, after which there should be indictments and trials. Without this we lose the respect of our allies, a chance of rapprochement with our enemies, deterrence of future outrages, and any claim to the moral high ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other foreign governments??
Posted by: CJC on May 22, 2008 10:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if we've let other foreign governments in.

Will a Democratic president put a stop to this??

The author of the book the first poster mentioned is Murat Kurnaz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

natural friends, finally out in the open...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 3, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lemme see...
.
.
...wasn't mainland China's hardliner Communist regime a BIG fan of Nixon's Administration?
no shock there...
yeah... the same administration that featured Rumsfeld & Cheney?

uh-huh.

well, at least they're admitting who their friends are...

Maureen Dowd: Rumsfeld And Cheney “Turned Back The Clock To The Nixon Era…Bringing Back Wiretapping Along With Presidential Power”…

mutual interests?
-long walks on the Beach
-ping-pong
-torture
-summary executions
-big walls along borders
-blending of national interests with corporate/industrial/resource management structures
-government 'gangs'...
-totalitarianism...
-massive dismantlement of privacy rights
-fanatical public devotion to a single book of beliefs"...


┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]