Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Next Troop Rotation to Consist Solely of National Guard

Posted by Spencer Ackerman, Attackerman at 3:54 AM on May 20, 2008.


Troop shortages require that all soldiers rotated into Iraq this spring come from the National Guard.
nationalguard
national guard

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Fresh out from the Pentagon: the next Iraq rotation. Notice how it’s all National Guard troops.

The Department of Defense announced today the alert of additional major units scheduled to deploy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The announcement involves four brigades from the Army National Guard.

All four brigades will have a security force mission and be assigned tasks to assure freedom of movement and continuity of operations in the country. Those tasks will include base defense and route security in Iraq and Kuwait.

These deployments will involve approximately 14,000 personnel who will begin deploying in the spring of 2009. They are receiving alert orders now in order to provide them the maximum time to complete their preparations. It also provides a greater measure of predictability for family members and flexibility for employers to plan for military service of their employees.

Specific decisions made by the secretary of defense include:

72nd Brigade Combat Team, Texas National Guard

2nd Brigade Combat Team, 28th Infantry Division, Pennsylvania National Guard

256th Brigade Combat Team, Louisiana National Guard

278th Brigade Combat Team, Tennessee National Guard

So we’re so thin on active-duty Army brigades that we’re sending reservists to Iraq as our entire spring-2009 force complement. Perhaps by then we’ll have a president who decides that such an Iraq deployment is the last one U.S. forces will make.

Crossposted to The Streak.

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, troops, national guard


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When there are no troops or guards left at home...
Posted by: wagadog on May 20, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will be when the next natural or man-made or contrived disaster strikes.

And then we'll be ruled by Cheney's rent-a-cops.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So who now protects the home borders?
Posted by: chuckjs on May 20, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always been of the impression that the National Guard was just that. A military force tasked with defending and protecting the land of the Nation and not Other Nations. I was taught that it's sole responsibility was to defend American soil when invaded. It's secondary duties were to help areas within our borders to cope with disastours and uprisings.

So now with so so many National Guard troops either deployed or recouperating from a deployment who's left to defend American shores. Is the government, seven years after an attack on our shores, so confident that it will not happen again, they are willing to deploy forces to other countries, that are meant to be here for America's defence.

So while America fights them there so they don't have to fight them here, they are advertising to the enemy that noone is home looking after the house. If they were smart enough to figure out how to plane bomb 3 out of a possible 4 targets with everyone in the country, how long do you think it will take for them, the enemy, to realize their best bet is to bring the fight back here due to a lack of defense forces. And if you think I am way out in left field tell me this. If they can sneak across the border from Pakistan into Afghanistan and back without getting caught what is to stop them from getting to America via Pakistan? I bet it's the no-fly list that bans Air Marshalls. And don't bother saying the intelligence community. GW just spent 7 years telling us how bad the intelligence is and was.

Question is who the hell will defend America with all it's soldiers overseas? Are they so blind that they cannot see that America is ripe for invasion or attack. Why you ask? Because everyday there is more and more news, broadcast worldwide for all to hear, about the American military, and it's home defenders being streached far too thin and being somewhere else. All it will take is one loony tune to make it happen. Just think back a few years to what happened when all of the military was where it should be. What will happen now while they are all away from home? One dictator or one terrorist can make it happen.

Let's just hope someone comes to their senses and realizes just how undefended the country really is. After all Putin is reforming the old Soviet Union right under ol' Georgies nose. But I suppose terrorism is a far bigger problem that the reemergence of the old soviet state and communism right? Spent forty years and gazillions of dollars fighting communism only to have it come back in less than 20. Way to go!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They never should have been sent in the first place.
Posted by: Lauren on May 20, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a deliberate move to un-defend our homeland in the first place. They should refuse to go. All of them all at once as a war protest. The governors should support them as heros doing the right and patriotic thing, standing down to an illegal war.

The people there should come home. The whole thing is a complete disaster. You do not 'own' a country just because you broke it. We should not send one more person there. The ones there should come home. If the neocons have a big problem with that, let THEM go there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on May 20, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... of course... its only the casualties that would keep us from being there for a hundred years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Quite
Posted by: Eyezpy on May 21, 2008 10:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those brigades are just part of the whole rotation. The Guard and active-duty are on different deployment cycles. Those brigades will be piece-mealed all over the country for guard duty. We're not putting the National Guard in charge of OIF.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH
Posted by: robbie.seal on May 22, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Ackerman. You need to do more research before you post something that is eroneous at best. Those are not the only guys going in the Spring. How do I know? I am going as part of an active duty Division. Now, if you would like a better source than you were using to write this "article", subscribe to the Army Times. They have the rotation schedule spelled out. Guard untis are rotating in and out much like us active duty guys, and they are doing a darn good job at it too. I look forward to working with them again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part of what is going on for the next disaster.
Posted by: nightgaunt on May 23, 2008 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater World Wide was given $1 billion to recruit from all over the world for what? Why to 'augment' the depleted forces here in case of a disaster or riot or something they will use against us. Backed by InfraGard and a militarized police force with full plenary powers under 'emergency conditions' which will fully suspend what is left of our rights. Something long planned.
What better way to have our people overseas while while mercinaries paid for with our tax money take control of our streets! Blackwater will be hiring thugs from many places that have had and some still have voilence like Chile and Nigeria and where ever else BWW will recruit from. We've seen how they were in New Orleans and in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]