Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Superdelegates Turned Down $1 Million Offer from Clinton Donor

Posted by Mike Connery, AlterNet at 1:31 PM on May 19, 2008.


Two superdelegates representing the Young Democrats of America turned down a promise of $1 million in exchange for their endorsement of Sen. Clinton.
saban
Saban

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

So how much is the youth vote worth this year? Apparently $500,000 a pop if you are a superdelegate.

The Huffington Post is running a shocker of a piece claiming that Clinton donor Haim Saban offered the Young Democrats of America access to $1 million in funds if their two remaining superdelegates - David Hardt and Crystal Strait - endorsed Sen. Clinton:

One of Sen. Hillary Clinton's top financial supporters offered $1 million to the Young Democrats of America during a phone conversation in which he also pressed for the organization's two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse the New York Democrat, a high-ranking official with YDA told The Huffington Post.
Haim Saban, the billionaire entertainment magnate and longtime Clinton supporter, denied the allegation. But four independent sources said that just before the North Carolina and Indiana primaries, Saban called YDA President David Hardt and offered what was perceived as a lucrative proposal: $1 million would be made available for the group if Hardt and the organization's other uncommitted superdelegate backed Clinton.
YDA isn't answering anymore questions about this incident on the record, but if this is true, all I can say is "good for the Young Democrats!" for turning the offer down. At a time when Sen. Obama's campaign is threatening to defund 527 organizations (YDA is a 527), and many progressive youth organizations still struggle to raise their yearly budgets, YDA's leadership, this could not have been an easy choice for YDA leaders. $1 million is a substantial portion of YDA's yearly budget. This was the ultimate Faustian bargain dangled in front of them and they turned it down. They made the ethical choice to forgo what might be best for themselves politically and faithfully represent the will of their constituents in the nominating process.

It was even braver considering the potential fallout from other donors close to Saban:

Members of the Young Democrats agonized about the potential fallout of Saban's call; his financial offer represented one-third of the group's 2008 budget. Democratic officials and fundraisers were consulted about how to respond, and at times the discussions were "emotional," one participant said. "It is scary for them, Haim is very powerful, he has great influence over donors who give to them."
Another source said that Hardt and others were acutely aware of Saban's status within Democratic circles and were concerned that their organization would suffer long-term harm if they declined his offer or if news of the proposal became public.
It's a rather unfortunate dynamic in progressive politics that such donors have so much influence over the process, but that's how it works. Usually it's not even accurate to talk of donors, but rather "donor networks." If you piss-off the wrong donor, their network can be closed to you forever. So it was a gutsy move for YDA to snub a major donor like that. But I'm convinced it was the right move. Taking that money would have been disastrous for YDA in a number of ways -- not least in that endorsing Sen. Clinton over Obama would put the YDA leadership totally out of touch from the will of the surging youth vote, the very people they are supposed to represent. In terms of organizational branding and PR, it would most likely be taken as indicative of an organizational culture in which the leadership worked to protect and further their own political advancement at the expense of the membership. If YDA had taken the deal, those observations would have been right.

So where do YDA endorsements stand? Last week, Crystal Strait endorsed Sen. Obama. Her counterpart, Francisco Domenech, endorsed Clinton months ago. David Hardt, the President of YDA, and the person to whom the offer was allegedly made, has yet to endorse a candidate. Last week he released a statement indicating that he would wait until all votes were cast before making his endorsement.

By the by, this is yet another reason why I think my arguments for more transparency, and some basic guidelines, in how YDA and CDA superdelegates cast their ballots are called for and indeed long overdue.

Digg!

Tagged as: youth, hillary clinton, superdelegates, young democrats, haim saban


Breast Flaunting for Jesus
The life of a failed California beauty pageant contestant gets even weirder.
Post by Thers. November 11, 2009.
Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They had progressive politics in 1903, too. . .
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 19, 2008 11:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a rather unfortunate dynamic in progressive politics that such donors have so much influence over the process, but that's how it works.

Yes... it is indeed unfortunate. It is also unfortunate that a country that holds itself up as an example for the world to follow uses military force to seize other country's oilfields, but that's how it works...

It is also unfortunate that our global trade agreements have impoverished workers on both ends, created economic refugees, aka illegal immigrants, and have resulted in environmental and social destruction while enriching a very select few, mostly large investors - but that's how it works.

Still, I don't recall anything in the Constitution about this "donors controlling progressive politics" business, so why is that how it works? Unless you are talking about "how the Mafia works" or the family structure of Dons, Consiglieries and Lieutenants (a very widespread template - just look at the Secretary of Defense office).

Wait.. there is this, though.

Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

and this:
When money talks, politicians listen

In 1903, in a deathbed interview with muckraking journalist Lincoln Steffens, Philadelphia political boss Israel Durham complained that "contributions to campaign funds are more regular, and therefore worse, than bribes." A bribe influenced only one decision, admitted the old fixer, but campaign contributions influenced the entire political process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow does this ever stink of a.....
Posted by: chuckjs on May 20, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bribe. That sounds like just another form of vote buying. Anyone up for a criminal investigation. I'll give you a million dollars if you vote for my candidate.

And the Americans think that the Dems will be a better and more viable choice than the Repubes. Two different coloured suits at the same shareholders meeting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another reason I will NOT vote for Hillary
Posted by: Kimmy on May 20, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Add this to the ever growing list of reasons Hillary is nothing more Than a Cheney Protege.
She's Must be a top Capo in his crime syndicate,reason they are pulling out all the STOPS for her. How much more evidence must be thrown in the face of her supporters until they finally realize she is a FRAUD- a covert operative hell bent on distroying the Dem Party, Our Nation and aspiring to the World (obliterate Iran- right out of cheney's mouth into hers!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money Talks
Posted by: Trainer12 on May 20, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, as my high school social studies teacher told me back in the 60's, "Money talks, b.s walks and we are all running a close third." "Politics always makes strange bedfellows. "Good for the YDA for sticking to principles and speaking truth to power. They have more integrity in my eyes now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Believer in the Better
Posted by: nomomorons on May 20, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulations to YDA superdelegates and members! Their integrity exemplifies what is best about today's youth and our country, and, alsa, what is becoming far too rare.

What a stinking, rotten abuse of the system; not surprisingly, it's contamination is at the hands of the super-cynics who typify the Clinton putsch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

84gawker
Posted by: jbwestwood on May 20, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thought criminal: You're spot on but then so are some other bloggers. Point? Words cycled in self-congratulaory mode are empty, empty.

In my endless search for light at the end of a very dreary tunnel, I can find no hope other than that promised by a third party. That party's power would have to stem from a crafty take over of political districts not easily swayed by the 'usual money tactics'. Once established, such power centers could, with proper guidance, grow into a force to be feared by traditional pols.

Wild? Naive? Probably, I'm just a geezer trying to arrange a better prospect for my grandchilddren. We can't repeal human nature, but we might be cunning enough to marshal the good into groups that would lessen the influence of the bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Buy a nomination, cut out the middleman!
Posted by: PaulK on May 20, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New! Brought to you by the Democratic (name copyrighted) Party. Now you can buy off 800 superdelegates directly! Why worry about pesky "voters" and outrageous media buys? Just pay your money directly to genuine Democratic Party "activists" (not all activists may move when you poke them, some may have recently died) and power brokers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have 2 questions...
Posted by: Quannah on May 20, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Is this even legal?

2. So, the Young Democrats turned down the obvious bribe... but who took the bribe?

No wonder Hillary is so smug about her rhetoric that it ain't over yet! She's buying the nomination! Yet more political dirty tricks ripped right out of the pages of the Republics play book. You know, Karl Rove stated on Sunday that Hillary would win the nomination - that he crunched the numbers and that she has won the popular vote and predicted she will win the SuperDelegate count. Maybe he's her advisor on this bribery thing and has inside info. God knows he is an expert on stealing elections.

Shameful. Absolutely shameful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Question
Posted by: tngreen on May 20, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not read the entire article on HuffingtonPost, so maybe this point is addressed there, but to my mind the real question is, what is in it for Haim Saban? What promises has Clinton made to him/his organization? Where's the quid pro quo?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Real Question Posted by: jebpgh
» RE: The Real Question Posted by: maxloen
not everyone, has a price
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on May 20, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in '93, I was offered one million dollars, by government insiders, to leave the country, and never return, or go to prison for life!!! A.C.T. offered me free legal assistance, and a pound of marijuana a month, if I changed my plea over to medical necessity!!! Needless to say , but I did not sell out, but my x-wife did!!! Some people do have a price!!! Jesus, had nails placed in his hands, while Judas, had 30 pieces of silver placed in his hands!!! Whats in your hands??? Whats in the governments hands??? Addiction is a human frailty, not a criminal act!!! Corruption, is also a human frailty, but it is most certainly a criminal act!!! Power corrupts, but it is still legal, because it is the corrupted, that run the world!!! ACCORDING to the laws of human nature, if drugs cause addiction, than, power causes corruption!!! Please name one person with any power, that is not corrupt??? was that a corrupt answer??? With today's technology, I believe that it is time to replace the government, with a constitutional computer program!!! And charge all of the corrupt, for treason!!! bullets, know no BIAS!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And She Wonders
Posted by: Sissy on May 20, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why the polls show an oridinate amount of "untrustworthiness" in her....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spread it around
Posted by: jebpgh on May 20, 2008 12:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In politics, money is like manure - it doesn't do you any good unless you spread it around. The Clinton Foundation got into high gear making grants in key states like South Carolina before the primaries. West Virginia, a class unto itself, went for Kennedy in the 1960 primary when the Kennedys started writing big checks to local Democratic committeemen and their favorite projects. If ever there was a way to separate yourself from the legacy of this type of politics, Obama is it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

roncypert
Posted by: roncypert on May 20, 2008 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To paraphrase, "put our money where our fingertips are".

CONTRIBUTE!

http://www.yda.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

roncypert
Posted by: roncypert on May 20, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watched Part Two of "FDR" on PBS' "American Experience" last night, which picked up (from Part One) shortly before his first campaign for the Presidency.

I was struck by the similarities to our present times and especially the mood of the electorate and its reactions to FDR.

This was after seeing over 50,000 people congregating to see and hear Senator Obama speak in Oregon yesterday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One more thing...
Posted by: Quannah on May 20, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been watching the news today, and, granted, it's pretty much been the Sen. Kennedy story and the elections in Kentucky and Oregon.

But there hasn't been one word of this story in the MSM. Not one word. And I would think this would be a BIG story, wouldn't you? Trying to bribe SuperDelegates?

Perhaps tomorrow night on Countdown, Olbermann will bring it up. Or maybe Rachel Maddow on her radio show. Somebody better talk about it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]