Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Impact of Our Nation's Choices

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 11:31 AM on May 16, 2008.


In endorsing Sen. Obama, John Edwards again made a plea on behalf of millions living in poverty.
poverty

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Wednesday, John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. There is no shortage of articles digging into the endorsement, the potential attached strings (nothing substantiated), the potential split between John and Elizabeth's support (again nothing substantiated), and what it means for the Democratic party horserace in highly broad, speculative terms.

What none of the reports really address is the substance -- the gut and heart level issues -- that Edwards spoke about, which got an incredible reaction from the Michigan crowd.

Which, frankly, is altogether too familiar in political reportage given the dismissive and superficial tone of so much of the coverage of him when he was a candidate. I, however, refuse to just let it be -- because the speech was a barn burner, and listening to it was like taking a long, cool drink of water on a parched day...and it is one that we need to hear, loud and clear.

I've attached a YouTube of the speech in its entirety. If you missed it, do take the time to watch it in full. You'll thank me later.

He begins with some lovely words about Sen. Hillary Clinton, praising her long work for children and families, and saying that “[w]e are a stronger party because Hillary Clinton is a Democrat, we are a stronger country because of her years of public service, and we’re going to have a stronger presidential nominee in the fall because of her work.” Good for him, because she's worked her ass off -- and compassion, understanding and mutual respect are things we are in far too short a supply of these days.

From there, Edwards laid out why he was endorsing Sen. Barack Obama. And this is what I want most to amplify from it:

What brought all of us together is the profound belief that we can change this country. That there are servicemen and women in Iraq who can come home -- starting today. That our kids deserve to go to better schools than we went to. That we can run our cars on something other than oil. That we have good jobs that can fill these empty factories. And that the anxiety that all of our people face every day can change when we finally make two Americas, one America -- for every single one of us.

This is why you are here -- you are here because of the hope that you carry in your heart to make this country better....

There is another wall that divides us -- it's the moral shame of the 37 million of our own people who wake up in poverty every single day. In a nation of our wealth, to have millions of Americans who work every single day and still can't pay their electric bill and pay for their food at the same time. There are mothers out there who work two jobs every day to try to keep their kids from going to bed hungry. There are men and women who have worked hard all their lives so that they can try and buy a home, and they are living in a tent city because they have got nowhere else to go. This is not okay.

And for eight, long, long years, this wall has gotten taller. Yesterday...yesterday I was in Philadelphia, and I was announcing an initiative to cut poverty in America in half in the next ten years. And I am proud to say that today, Barack Obama stands with me in this cause....

If we stand together, we can change it.

Recently, selise mentioned how wonderful a conversation could be about what matters to folks in this country the most, and what ideas they have for making things better.

We must end the "I've got mine. You don't have any? Too fricking bad for you." mentality. One of the reasons that I am liberal is that I understand the long-term implications of such a greedy, short-sighted attitude, and what sort of benefit we could be getting from an "I've got mine. How can I help you get some, too?" shift in thought process. The "teach a man to fish" mentality has been tossed aside for far too long. When human beings are constantly told they are worthless, both through public attitudes and policies which further marginalize them? What else do we expect than for them to act the way that they are conditioned to feel.

Well, here's my theory -- one hard earned working with criminals, juveniles and neglected kids through the years: some folks you can't save, because they have been too broken to fix. But some folks, you can help out by simply showing some compassion, some respect, and some kindness and by helping them learn to respect and care for themselves.

This is especially true with at risk kids who can flourish if they are simply given a glimpse of who they could be, of a future that is brighter, and of someone caring enough to help them make it happen. But you can't know who you can help to lift themselves up to something better -- for themselves, their families, their community -- unless you try. And by trying, you lift yourself up in the process as well.

Wouldn't we all be better off in that America? What problems do you see...and what do you suggest as ways to fix them? Let's get that conversation started...

Digg!

Tagged as: poverty


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He was ignored,
Posted by: photony on May 16, 2008 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because he was the only person who beat any Republican, one on one, in every poll taken in the early months of the campaign.

He would have taken the fun and novelty out of the season for the "press". They would rather squeal on about this "first" or that "first" than discuss the real substance.

(That said, I am thrilled with the apparent choice, however historically novel).

Edwards got little credit from the press on his power as a speaker. "Barnburner" indeed! I talked to many people who became supporters after hearing him speak in person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clean Elections
Posted by: jstepp590 on May 16, 2008 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been very impressed by Barack Obama and this endorsment from someone I respect as much as I do Edwards is just icing on the cake.

However, my opinion is this. Our country is in trouble. Almost every problem we have in this country, from the Iraq war to oil our trade imbalance to pollution to mileage standards to military spending to health care all get tied in to the fact that we give corporations and even foreign governments access to our political system through campaign donations. Our polititions literally have to go hat in hand to the people who create these problems for us to get funding so that they can have a job. Obama defies this.

When I go to his website, he declares right there that he takes no money from lobbyists. This is what the Clean Election system does, gives the political candidate the option to get all their funds from our tax money and nobody else, meaning when they get elected they do not owe anyone but us. The way our politics are run right now they say what they have to to get elected and then do things not in our best interests to make their campaign contributors feel they got their investments worth. We pay the price because none of these people care about us.

I would be interested to know if Barack supports instituting Clean Elections in our political system? Considering that he doesn't function in a vacuum and all the corrupted polititions and their backers will fight it tooth and nail through the House and Senate, would he be publicly willing to start a citizens referendum so that this option goes to direct ballot, bypassing the established corruption and cronyism of our government?

If he's not willing to do this it seems to me it won't happen regardless of how honest and passionate he is about this work. In that case I still like and respect him even though he will fail. If he does then we will literally take all power away from anyone who isn't elected by us, as it should be. Barack Obama's name will go down in history as one of our greatest presidents. If he doesn't he will be tied in legislative knots by the special interests, accomplish nothing substancial or permanent, and be known as the greatest "might have been".

My opinion, and I know they all stink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How willing are we? Posted by: hurricane hugo
THANK YOU JOHN BOY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 17, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good to know that he and Obama share the same concerns. Poverty in this country is at an all time high and growing. It's unrealistic to believe that people who need food banks have deep concerns about the GWOT. If you don't have a roof and 3 squares the rest is irrelevant. The very poor do not have the energy to give a damn. That's the first thing we have to change. Hope is not a strategy but it is essential to bulding one. thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone see...
Posted by: Blondinista on May 18, 2008 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone see the hateful, nasty, sarcastic piece o' crap on the Washington Post's op-ed page yesterday morning? It bashed both Obama and Edwards. It was by Kathleen Parker -- never heard of her, but I think it may be Coulter writing under a pseudonym. Or maybe a rabid and bitter Clinton supporter with a bad case of sour grapes. I don't know, but even for a newspaper that gives Novak, Will, and Krauthammer a platform from which to spew their ideas, it seemed really quite over the top. I guess having polite, intelligent and meaningful political discourse in this country is never going to happen.

John Edwards is truly a voice for the impoverished and powerless. I have always admired him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]