Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Red-Faced GOP Turns Blue Over Mississippi Loss

Posted by Daniel DiRito, The All Spin Zone at 6:05 AM on May 14, 2008.


Democratic candidates continue to win elections even in the reddest of red states
purpleamerica
purple americ

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

The GOP’s loss of a special election in Mississippi’s 1st. district earlier this evening is bound to leave a number of Republicans tossing and turning tonight as they weigh the 2008 election. Regardless, Democrats should redouble their efforts to achieve more gains in November.

I don’t believe in crystal balls or tarot cards…but the fact that the Democrats have now won three congressional special elections in stronghold Republican districts doesn’t bode well for the GOP in November. The most recent loss took place tonight in the solidly red 1st. district in the state of Mississippi.

Democrat Travis Childers won Tuesday’s Mississippi special election runoff for Sen. Roger Wicker’s (R) former House seat, handing Democrats the biggest of their three special election takeovers this cycle and sending a listless GOP further into a state of disarray.

Childers led GOP candidate Greg Davis 53-47 with more than 90 percent of precincts reporting. Turnout increased substantially over the 67,000 voters who cast ballots in the April 22 open special election, with more than 100,000 voting in the runoff.

Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), issued a somber and self-reflective statement following the loss, saying Republicans were “disappointed” and that they need to prepare to run against Democrats campaigning as conservatives.

Cole added that “the political environment is such that voters remain pessimistic about the direction of the country and the Republican Party in general. Therefore, Republicans must undertake bold efforts to define a forward-looking agenda that offers the kind of positive change voters are looking for. This is something we can do in cooperation with our presidential nominee, but time is short.”

Now I understand that Rep. Cole has to respond to the defeat and I’m sure it’s difficult to craft a palatable rationale. Regardless, it’s hard to imagine the words “forward-looking agenda” and GOP in the same sentence.

After all, they have John McCain, a supposedly kinder, gentler version of George W. Bush, running as their presidential nominee…and he bills himself as the man who intends to keep his predecessor’s endless war racing full steam ahead. If that’s their notion of a forward-looking agenda, they might as well pull out the “mission accomplished” banners and see if they’re more effective the second time around.

The GOP also faces a campaign cash disadvantage that leaves them in a position they haven’t experienced in modern times. This, coupled with a disenchanted electorate, provides the Democrats with an arsenal of weapons that is both formidable and foreboding.

Both national party House committees plugged more than $1 million into the race, and spending by the candidates and outside groups like GOP-backing Freedom’s Watch pushed the race over $5 million total.

The NRCC’s investment was particularly painful given its stark cash disadvantage with less than six months to go until the November election.

The NRCC had just $7.2 million in the bank as of March 31. It spent $1.3 million in Mississippi.

Notwithstanding, it’s too early for the Democrats to let down their guard or uncork the champaign. While there is reason to be hopeful that the party will take back the White House and increase their majorities in the House and the Senate, a lot can still happen between now and November.

Needless to say, I suspect the GOP may be contacting Nancy Reagan’s astrologist in hopes of having something to look forward too. Hey, perhaps astrology could be the cornerstone of their forward-looking agenda? Nah, come to think of it, the first Bush already tried selling “A thousand points of light”.

Digg!

Tagged as: mississippi, dccc, rncc


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hat Trick
Posted by: jebpgh on May 14, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is now the third in three special elections in historically Republican controlled districts (Illinois, Louisiana and Mississippi). Gingrich was beating on this to his buddies as late as last week in strategy meetings. The amount of voter dissatisfaction with the GOP is running so deep that it is almost hard to imagine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And so it begins.....
Posted by: foreverhope on May 14, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00000000000000!


*doing the happy dance, clicking heels in the air, jumping up and down, clapping hands in excitment!*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And so it begins..... Posted by: jvaljon1
xvet
Posted by: xvet on May 14, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abraham Lincoln (one of the first and last decent Republican politicians)once said "You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time".
I'm trying to figure out why it has taken so long.I was beginning to think maybe old Abe was wrong.
xvet

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xvet Posted by: buzzsaw
» RE: xvet Posted by: xvet
A National Strategy
Posted by: dustinblythe on May 14, 2008 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our local Republican Congressional candidate has already dutifully parroted the National Republican Congressional Committee's talking points concerning our Congressman, Joe Donnelly (IN-2) and Barack Obama. He has tried in the past to link Rep. Donnelly to Obama and Rev. Wright, "Joe Donnelly needs to repuditate Rev. Wright's remarks and distance himself from Barack Obama", and now that Rep. Donnelly has endorsed Barack Obama Donnelly's opponent is trying to link Donnelly to what he calls "the most liberal member of the Senate...WORSE THAN TED KENNEDY!" Obviously this is a national strategy and since the Republican Party has no record to run on they are trying to appeal to the fears and suspicions of voters. "(Your Representative's name here) and Obama will raise taxes", "(Place Democrat's name here) and Obama support a big government approach to health care", "Obama and (place Democrat's name here) will cut and run in Iraq".

Thankfully this strategy has blown up in the face of the Republican Party in Louisiana and Mississippi. People's desire for change, and Obama's strength as an agent of change, is stronger than the divisive tactics the Republicans may try to distract from their own paltry record.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's like 1932 all over again
Posted by: JefffromCA on May 14, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans are dropping like flies before the landslide.

My grandfathers were both part of the FDR administrations. One directly and the other became a civilian employee of the Navy during WWII. Both believed he did a lot of good. FDR ran on a platform of change and looking out for the downtrodden. Nothing specific until after inauguration, but that did not stop the voters from voting for a seemingly charismatic, relatively inexperienced newcomer (FDR had been Gov. of NY for only 2 years and prior to that he was undersecretary of Navy during Wilson) who had less to say about his plans than any of the candidates for this year's election.

Red states are turning purple. Republican districts are turning Democratic. Pundits are saying this is a harbinger of change. I would like to think it is more than dissatisfaction within the particular districts, but I am waiting and working for November. O8ama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With 3/4 of Americans believing we're on the wrong track
Posted by: Quannah on May 14, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is no surprise. Democrats winning solid Republic seats is great news... but only if they are willing to change the direction this country has been going in.

What's a bigger story are all the new progressive candidates running for Congress this time, and beating those incumbent Democrats in the primaries who have been voting with the Republics. (Donna Edwards in Maryland comes to mind.) There is an opportunity to change the "business as usual" mindset in Washington.

No doubt the Democrats will take a much bigger majority in both the House and Senate this time. The question will be... what are they gonna do with it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bobby Decker AKA THE ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE PURPLERAIN MAN
Posted by: Bobby Decker on May 14, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO
PURGE THE SOTHERN RACISTS CRAKERS STARTING WITH
STROM "FILIBUSTER" THURMOND AND ENDING WITH GEORGE WALLACE
IN 1968....REAGAN DEMOCRATS...YEA RIGHT...THEY
WERE GEORGE WALLACE REPUBLICANS FIRST...WELL HERE IT IS 40 YEARS LATER ......WEVE BEEN THROUGH THE BINGE......NOW ITS TIME FOR A PURGE AGAIN TIME FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO DUMP ALL THE FREE TRADE LOVING SELL OUTS....THEY ALLREADY HAVE THEIR ON PARTY ITS CALLED REPUBLICAN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Susannah
Posted by: susannah on May 15, 2008 10:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Haley Barbour was upset in March when Barrack Obama showed so well in the primary, generating a much larger turnout than the Republicans expected. I'm sure Barbour regrets allowing this election to happen at all since he appointed Roger Wicker to fill Trent Lott's Senate seat for the remainder of Lott's term, even though the Mississippi Attorney General fought the procedure in court. The law calls for a special election to be held within ninety days to fill the vacant seat, as was done to fill Wicker's seat in Congress, but Barbour refused. Dick Cheney even came to Mississippi to campaign for Travis Childers' Republican opponent, and I understand almost 700 people turned out. We just have to hope the momentum continues through November when the seat is up for grabs in the general election. A Democratic Senator in Lott/Wicker's seat would be great too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Susannah Posted by: Sissy