Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Good News for McCloud, California in Fight Against Nestle

Posted by Tara Lohan, AlterNet at 11:14 AM on May 13, 2008.


Nestle is scaling back their proposal for a new bottling facility ... drastically.
nestle
nestle

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Water in your
mailbox!

 

Things are looking better for the town of McCloud, California where Nestle was trying to build a million square foot water bottling facility and was given a 100 year contract to potentially suck the community dry. You can read more about the scenario in our story or by visiting Corporate Accountability International.

An AP story in Business Week reported:

Nestle SA said Monday it is significantly scaling back plans in Northern California to build what would have been the country's largest water bottling plant.
The announcement by Nestle Waters North America comes after years of opposition by environmentalists and a group of residents in the rural town of McCloud.
With soaring fuel and transportation costs, building a 1 million square foot facility at the base of Mount Shasta no longer makes economic sense, said David Palais, Nestle's Northern California natural resource manager.
Nestle signed a contract in 2003 with the McCloud Community Services District to pump up to 521 million gallons of water a year. In exchange, the Swiss food and drink company agreed to pay $250,000 to $350,000 a year to the town of McCloud, about 200 miles north of Sacramento.
Apparently they are now looking to scale down to a 350,000 square feet facility and want 200 million gallons of water a year from three of McCloud's springs.

This looks like good news, but it's still a huge amount of water for town that may have greatly reduced water if snowpack continues to decline in the Shasta area in coming decades. It looks like locals are relieved to a degree but are not entirely comfortable with this new scenario.
Critics of the plant welcomed Nestle's announcement but called on McCloud's five-member services district to negotiate a better contract.
"While it certainly is a smaller plant than it would have been, it nonetheless uses a large amount of water. It's still a major operation," said Severn Williams, a spokesman for the Protect Our Waters Coalition. The coalition represents California Trout, Trout Unlimited and the McCloud Watershed Council, a citizens group.
... Williams also said the coalition wants a contract with a shorter timeframe than McCloud's current 100-year commitment to sell its water exclusively to Nestle.
It looks like all the hard work by community and environmental groups is paying off. Let's hope they keep the pressure on. Perhaps they will be able to send Nestle packing for good.

Digg!

Tagged as: water, bottled water, water privatization, mccloud, nestle

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.


Beat the Pundits ... Here's the Afghanistan Speech, What Do You Think?
Raw text here.
Post by Staff. December 1, 2009.
Corporate Grinch: GE Threatens to Kill Christmas Rather than Negotiate with Workers in Good Faith
All Tiny Tim wanted was to be a member of his local.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 1, 2009.
Why Is Politico Coddling Dick Cheney Again?
More softballs than summer camp. The Obama administration is understandably vexed.
Post by Steve Benen. December 1, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?