Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Afro-Netizen
All Spin Zone
Altercation
Americablog
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Another Iranian Online
August J. Pollak
Baghdad Burning
Barry Lando
Bloggrrrlz Gallery
Blondesense
Bob Geiger
Body and Soul
Boing Boing
Booman Tribune
BOP News
Bush Watch
BUZZFLASH
Carpetbagger
Clean Air Blog
Cool Hunting
Corrente
CrooksandLiars
Cursor
Dahr Jamail
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
DC Media Girl
DemiOrator
Direland
Echidne of the Snakes
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton
Fact-esque
Falafel Sex, and Other Things Best Left Unsaid
Farai Chideya
Feminist Peace Network
Feministe
Feministing
Frameshop
Gristmill
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
James Wolcott
Jesus General
Lady Jayne's Blog
Liberal Oasis
Mad Kane
Mahablog
Majikthise
Media Girl
Media is a Plural
MediaCitizen
Metafilter
Michael Berube
MyDD
News Dissector
News For Real
Norbizness
Oliver Willis
Pacific Views
Pandagon
Political Animal
PopPolitics.com
PR Watch
Prometheus 6
Raed in the Middle
RH Reality Check
Robert Greenwald
Roger Ailes
Rox Populi
Sadly, No!
Seeing the Forest
Shakespeares Sister
Sirotablog
Sisyphus Shrugged
skippy the bush kangaroo
Slacktivist
SpeakSpeak
Stay Free!
Steve Gilliard
Talking Points Memo
TalkLeft
TBogg
Thatcoloredfellasweblog
The Bilerico Project
The Hutchinson Political Report
The Republic of T
The Revealer
The Sideshow
The Swift Report
Think Progress
This Modern World
TikvahGirl
Trish Wilson
War and Piece
Waveflux
What She Said!
Whiskey Bar
Working Families Vote 2008
Republican Procedural Tactics Throw Mothers Under the Bus
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
Also in PEEK
Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
Steve Benen The Carpetbagger Report
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Jonathan Schwarz A Tiny Revolution
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
Digby Hullabaloo
Harking back to this morning's pyrrhic Republican stand against motherhood
Republicans, unhappy with the Democratic majority, have been using such procedural tactics as this all week to bring the House to a standstill, but the assault on mothers may have gone too far. House Minority Leader John Boehner, asked yesterday to explain why he and 177 of his colleagues switched their votes, answered: "Oh, we just wanted to make sure that everyone was on record in support of Mother's Day."...
The majority has taken, once again, their go-it-alone policy," Boehner lamented yesterday. "It's time for Democrats and Republicans to work together."
To induce this working together, Boehner decided to stop the House from working at all. As House Democrats tried to pass legislation to ease the mortgage crisis on Wednesday, Republicans served up hours of procedural delays, demanding a score of roll call votes: 10 motions to adjourn, half a dozen motions to reconsider, various and sundry amendments, a motion to approve the daily journal, a motion to instruct and a "motion to rise."
The high point came just after 6 p.m., when, after one of the motions to adjourn, 61 members lined up to change their votes, one by one. Forty-six went from aye to no, while 15 changed from no to aye. The maneuver ate up 28 minutes in all -- and caused an eruption by Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, who accused the minority of a "filibuster by vote changing."
Yes, they have been doing this all week, but they didn't start this week, and this is hardly the worst case. I'll see you mothers, and raise you grandmothers, grandfathers, children, grandchildren, a widow, and holocaust survivors
Republicans are outraged. Democrats are putting forward a resolution holding White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers in contempt of Congress. House GOP rank-and-file are planning a dramatic walk out when the vote is called.
Democrats are affronted. Right in the middle of the Statuary Hall service for the late Tom Lantos, a Republican went to the floor -- just steps from the solemn proceedings -- and called a procedural vote, apparently out of pique.
On the right, the Lantos memorial service. On the left, the House filing in to respond to a bullshit procedural vote
So why'd you want to do a thing like that?
Why, to protect the president, that's why.
Democrats angrily denounced the GOP as insensitive for calling a "motion to adjourn" — essentially a dilatory tactic — while dignitaries were still giving tributes to Lantos, a Holocaust survivor who was chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee. But Republican aides shot back quickly, saying it was Democrats who broke an agreement to keep the House in recess during the memorial service.
To some extent, it appears both sides are at fault, but the recriminations have been fast and furious.
"The disrespect that has been shown by a Republican member of Congress in calling a political procedural motion during the memorial service for the late Chairman Tom Lantos is incomprehensible," said Stacey Bernards, a spokeswoman for House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.). "It is unjustifiable, and Republican leaders should restrict their members from further such action."
A senior Republican aide, however, said the GOP was given no choice in asking for a vote because Democrats broke their commitment to keep the House in recess during the memorial service. Democrats are pushing a contempt vote against White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former Bush counsel Harriet Miers, and have bypassed traditional rules allowing an hour of debate on the matter, according to Jo Maney, a spokeswoman for Republicans on the House Rules Committee.
Well, that's some collegial, post-partisan shit right there.
Funny. I don't remember the Democrats behaving like that while the Republicans shut them out completely over the last six years. As a matter of fact, there are issues (like, say, FISA or war funding) where I still think they could be showing a bit more feist.
So what's got Ol' Saddle Face and the desperado caucus up in arms this time??
US House set to pass sweeping housing rescue bill
Reuters - May 6, 2008
By Patrick Rucker WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The US House of Representatives is due on Wednesday to begin debating a housing rescue package that could see the ...
Bush threatens veto of housing aid
The Associated Press - May 6, 2008
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House on Tuesday threatened a veto of Democrats' broad housing rescue plan, calling it a burdensome bailout that would open ...
Conflict over housing crisis threatens rescue packageThe Associated Press - May 7, 2008
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush and Congress are clashing over how to address the housing crisis, clouding the prospects of an election-year rescue package ...
House GOP Rallies At White HouseCBS News, NY - May 7, 2008
By Daniel W. Reilly (The Politico) Seeking to put a spate of bad news behind them, House Republicans headed over to the White House on Wednesday morning, ...
Conflict over housing crisis threatens rescue packageSan Luis Obispo Tribune, CA - May 7, 2008
By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS AP Writer AP Photo President Bush flanked by House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, right, and House Republican Whip Roy ...
White House threatens veto of FHA-rescue billCNNMoney.com - May 7, 2008
The House takes up a housing bill with sweeteners meant to reel in Republicans who have called its main provision a bailout. The White House isn't biting. ...
On the other hand, you've got a party at a fundraising, party identification, polling, and let's face it, candidate disadvantage, and your own seat is at stake. What do you do?
House Approves $300B Housing Aid BillSmartmoney.com - 23 hours ago
By Michael R. Crittenden WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- US House Democrats, joined by Republicans from states hard hit by the foreclosure crisis, voted Thursday ...
Homeowner Rescue Bill Passed Despite Veto ThreatNew York Times, United States - 17 hours ago
By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN WASHINGTON — Hoping to throw a rescue line to at least half a million families in danger of losing their homes, ...
You're in the leadership, on the other hand, this looks very bad indeed. You don't want the guy your party is stapled to have to veto some voter's hopes of keeping their houses.
So, you do what you always do. You fume and rage and stomp your feet and delay and make threats and you wait for the Democrats to back down.
Only this time they don't.
So then what happens?
Any one of a stream of former White House patsies could have told you that.
White House leaves door open on housing rescueReuters - 1 hour ago
By Kevin Drawbaugh WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Friday set out terms for a possible deal on a housing market rescue plan, as a sweeping package ...
Imagine that.
More like this, please.
and hey - happy mother's day
| Also in PEEK | |||
| Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials. Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008. |
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing. Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008. |
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror" "This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror." Post by Digby. July 23, 2008. |
|