Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pentagon Backs Plan to Build "Zone of Influence" in Iraq

Posted by Satyam Khanna, Think Progress at 2:15 PM on May 5, 2008.


The Pentagon wants to Disney-fy the Green Zone and create a lasting cultural footprint in Baghdad.
zoneofinfluence

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Note to Elite Pundits: You Don't Speak for 'Ordinary Folks'
Digby Hullabaloo

Iraqi Media: U.S. Building Airbase on Iran Border
Editors Gorilla's Guides

This Week in God
Steve Benen The Carpetbagger Report

The White House has repeatedly insisted that the United States has “no desire for permanent bases” in Iraq. Nevertheless, the Bush administration is seeking to leave its footprint on Iraq through other means. The AP reports that the Pentagon is backing a $5 billion dollar plan to “transform the U.S.-protected Green Zone” into a “centerpiece for Baghdad’s future,” resulting in “big paydays for early investors:“

For Washington, the driving motivation is to create a “zone of influence” around the new $700 million U.S. Embassy to serve as a kind of high-end buffer for the compound, whose total price tag will reach about $1 billion after all the workers and offices are relocated over the next year.

“When you have $1 billion hanging out there and 1,000 employees lying around, you kind of want to know who your neighbors are. You want to influence what happens in your neighborhood over time,” said Navy Capt. Thomas Karnowski, who led the team that created the development plan.

An incentive for the project, which would include hotels, resorts, and commercial development in the Green Zone, appears to be lining the pockets of investors and allies rather than re-building Iraq’s economy. In fact, Karnowski acknowledged that American officials would vet potential investors because of a “vested interest” — mirroring the cronyism of Saddam’s Hussein’s regime.

Some Iraqi leaders even have drawn parallels to the U.S.-backed development plan and what Saddam Hussein did in the area — known by its Iraqi name of Tashri during his regime. Hussein stocked the neighborhood with family and tribal allies, political loyalists and members of his elite Republican Guard. Karnowski called the accusation “partially true.”

Many U.S. embassy officials have called the plan “unrealistic.” One added that Iraqis, a majority of whom oppose the U.S. presence, are unlikely to want the U.S. to “turn this area into downtown Kansas City.” “The Iraqi government wants to limit U.S. power in the Green Zone,” a top adviser to Prime Minister Maliki said.

But the permanent U.S. footprint in Iraq is already making inroads. In addition to construction of the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, the largest in the world, the Los Angeles-based company that developed Disneyland is developing a “massive American-style amusement park” in Baghdad “that will feature a skateboard park, rides, a concert theatre and a museum.” That project has the support of Gen. David Petraeus.

“If you talk to people at the State Department, they still believe a hotel isn’t going up. But it is a done deal,” Karnowski said of the Marriott project. Another “possible $1 billion investment could come from MBI International, a conglomerate that focuses on hotels and resorts and is led by Saudi Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber.”

Digg!

Tagged as: baghdad, iraq, pentagon, disney, bases


Note to Elite Pundits: You Don't Speak for 'Ordinary Folks'
These gasbags will never tire of the narrative.
Post by Digby. July 19, 2008.
Iraqi Media: U.S. Building Airbase on Iran Border
If true, a provocative move.
Post by Editors. July 19, 2008.
This Week in God
A round-up of religious news.
Post by Steve Benen. July 19, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Just In Case...
Posted by: Wacre on May 5, 2008 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anyone out there wonders why 'they' hate us, here's a prime example. We, supposedly to help the Iraqi people, invade their nation and depose their ruler (who was a son of a bitch, but that 's beside the point), and essentially put ourselves in his place by creating a government sympathetic to our wishes in that nation.

Boy, I can't wait to see the blowback from this debacle, though when it happens, as it inevitably will, we will have people here whining about how they hate us for our values and our 'democracy' when what they (which seems of late to be just about everyone in the world other than us) really hate us because we can't mind our own fraggin' business.

Oh, and I forgot to mention that we're also guilty of coveting other nations' oil as if were our own and expanding our empire a military base at a time.

I am not much of a reader of the Bible, but if there's something in there about this I have yet to hear any of our 'religious leaders' mention it.

I guess they're too busy worrying about the sex of the consenting adult I happen to be screwing at any given moment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hope the Iraqis...
Posted by: Quannah on May 6, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have the good sense to reject this forced "culturization" project being foisted upon them by their "benefactors" and bomb/bulldoze this monstrosity before it is completed.

Considering they are doing this in the Cradle of Civilization is quite the irony - especially since we've ruined the culture they have had there since ancient times. Our leaders have no shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just incredible
Posted by: CJC on May 6, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is going to use this "resort" in the middle of Baghdad? Iraqis?

Maybe the amusement park and resort will be open to rich residents of Gulf States. Though why they'd want to come to Baghdad, when they can go anywhere in the world they want to, is beyond imagination.

Is this just a huge payoff of some kind to Marriott and MBI International? And if so, what for?

And how are they going to keep out the mortars that are now reaching the Green Zone?

There's no better use for $$$$ - like for electricity for the whole city, or repairing the water system? How about the hospitals or the schools?

And how much of this is more of our tax dollars going for private benefit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just incredible Posted by: peacefullaim
"New strategy to fight resistance--Wall-in a section of the city & bomb it"
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 6, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.
Friday May 2nd, 2008
.
Hundreds killed by US strikes in Sadr City
New strategy to fight resistance--Wall-in a section of the city & bomb it

Based in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Pepe Escobar writes The Roving Eye for Asia Times Online. He has reported from Iraq, Iran, Central Asia, US and China. He is the author of the recently published Red Zone Blues. Pepe is a regular analyst for The Real News Network.

Transcript, of video coverage & analysis:

"It’s been five years since George W. Bush proclaimed Mission Accomplished in Iraq. Now take a very good look at these images. Yes, they are disturbing. You won’t see them on Western TV networks. And no, there’s not a hint of mission accomplished about them.

These are innocent civilians-– poor Shi’ite Arabs living in the three million-strong Sadr City in Baghdad, one of the largest slums in the world. As The Real News has reported Sadr City is being walled in–- transformed into a gulag, and pounded relentlessly by US air strikes. The Pentagon-–and the Iraqi government–-say they are “protecting the Green Zone” by attacking Sadr City.

As if that traumatic scene of the helicopter leaving the roof of the US embassy in Saigon in 1975 was rattling too many military minds. 1745 Iraqi civilians were killed in April-– against 159 policemen and 104 soldiers. Over 400 people were killed in Sadr City alone. Only 10% were guerrillas. This carnage is a direct consequence of Dick Cheney’s recent tour of the Middle East, Iraq included. This carnage is a direct consequence of Gen. David Petraeus’ surge. These are victims of a vicious political battle between the al-Maliki government in Baghdad, supported by the al-Hakim family, and the US, against Muqtada al-Sadr, who they fear will win the next elections in October-–because, of course, he is immensely popular.

And in the big picture, these deaths are a graphic example of how the sophisticated Pentagon machine plans to deal with “problematic” urban slums in the future.

We wall them, we isolate them, and we bomb the hell out of them. Who cares about collateral damage? It may be very harsh to say, but that's how it is....
"


~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oxheadone
Posted by: oxheadone on May 7, 2008 12:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At some future point in time the Iraqis may form their own government. At that point they may decide to bring the US before the World Court as guilty of war crimes and some of our current leaders as war criminals. This may be one of the reasons for never leaving.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]