Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

U.S. Congress to Iraq: Pay Our War Expenses With Your Oil Revenue

Posted by Ben Lando, Iraq Oil Report at 6:35 AM on April 28, 2008.


Adding insult to injustice, five new pieces of legislation call for Iraqis to pay for the U. S. occupation of their country.
iraqoil

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Iraqis would be forced to pay for U.S. efforts in their country directly or via loans from the United States if any of at least five similar pieces of legislation introduced on Capitol Hill this month is approved.

This comes as Americans deal with — and politicians respond to — an unpopular and expensive war, a sinking economy and record gas prices, Ben Lando reports for United Press International.

“Whether or not you support the war strategy,” said Rep. Ron Klein, D-Fla., “the Iraqi government needs to pay for its fair share after five years and $600 billion in American taxpayer expenses.”

Klein’s resolution would require U.S. funds for Iraq reconstruction and security forces training, as well as the cost of fuel for U.S. operations, to be repaid by Iraq as a loan.

“What this resolution does is put the burden on the Iraqi people to say, ‘no more free lunches from the American public,’” Klein said. “It’s not some benefactor from the outside who just keeps writing more and more checks every month.” …

“This is just our notice to these guys we’re not going to carry the whole load anymore,” said Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif. He’s proposed in the past requiring Iraq to repay all U.S. expenses since the invasion. “Morally I think they should, but that’s a whole other debate.” …

The U.S. auditor of Iraq reconstruction efforts said in a January report more Iraqi funds have been allocated for reconstruction than U.S. funds through 2007. While the United States was initially tasked with spending the Iraqi money — a reconstruction effort criticized for being ill-planned and seeing few results — responsibility shifted to the new Iraqi government, which has had a harder time, regularly spending only a small percentage of its multibillion-dollar capital budget. …

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, oil


Race-Baiting Former Senator Jesse Helms Has Died
Conservative Republican railed against "Negro hoodlums", opposed the Voting Rights Act, backed terrorists, and died an unrepentant segregationist.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 4, 2008.
NYC Cops Harass Club Owner Whose CCTV Footage Overturned Drug Conviction
Talk about shooting the messenger.
Post by . July 4, 2008.
Watermelon is the New Viagra
USDA-funded research helps Americans put some pizazz in their picnic baskets this fourth of July.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
why should iraq continue to pay for our war of aggression and the occupation?
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Apr 28, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thinking the iraqis 'owe' us anything is just a continuance of the bush policy of no accountability on our part.

congress is complicit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» reparations from a conquered country? Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
mcyclemama
Posted by: mcyclemama on Apr 28, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I'm concerned, since the Iraqi's can't and/or won't get their "stuff" together to govern and police themselves, they should be paying the WHOLE cost of this bush/cheney action. What has been happening to the oil profits so far? Bet it goes straight from the ground to bush/cheney's pockets. Get the H out of that quagmire!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about we just leave, then we don't have to spend any more money there
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Apr 28, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we did in Iraq is akin to knocking someone's house down and now we are asking them for their piggy bank to keep guarding the wreckage from looters.

Let's just leave already, our economy is going down the tubes, the world is running out of oil, we need to spend money developing our energy industry, not throwing it away.

We fucked up their country, yes. But I didn't vote for that, I'd prefer the U.S. didn't enter a recession, our money didn't deflate into worthlessness, and we all lose our jobs cause we continue to rack up this enormous debt from this bullshit war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, the Iraqis should pay for the amerikan invasion.
Posted by: AussieGeoff on Apr 28, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These congress critters are correct.

Iraqis pleaded with the US to be invaded, raped, tortured and/or murdered. Iraq pleaded to be invaded, occupied and plundered.

Now to calculate the cost.

Iraq must pay for the piano wire (which is to wrapped around the necks to arrest their acceleration from being dropped at least 50 metres) of all those that:

1) Planned the invasion and occupation;

2) Planned, authorized, conducted, supervised, participated or failed to prevent while knowing about torture, murder or rape of Iraqis and others; and

3) Planned, authorized, conducted, supervised or participated in the plunder of Iraq.

In addition Iraq must pay for the high explosives to bring US infrastructure to the same level as the US has bought Iraqi infrastructure. That should be reasonably cheap if various reports I have seen are anywhere near correct about current amerikan infrastructure.

Of course, these costs will only be assessed after amerika leaves Iraq, Iraq rebuilds their infrastructure and economy. Until that time those responsible should be held incommunicado and subject to questioning using US endorsed "enhanced interrogation" techniques. I am sure there are many countries that will be prepared to accommodate them during this period.

Of course amerika could just bear the costs of their voluntary invasion and occupation, send the war criminals to the Hague and compensate Iraq and Iraqis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nvannes
Posted by: nvannes on Apr 28, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it me or is this administration as screwed up as I think? They invade a much smaller country because they are afraid it might attack us, (remember WPD's and "they might use them against us"?). Then, after 5 years of illegal occupation and failed political efforts and growing discontent at home and abroad, they claim the cost of the (lost) war and the chaos that our illegal and unwanted actions created should be paid for by the country that we invaded. Am I in the twighlight zone? Put this shoe on the other foot and see how it feels: China invades us, fails miserably to conquor the soul and will of the American people, creates havoc with our infrastructure and economy, and then says they are leaving but expect to be paid back for the money they put into trying to "save" us with their invasion. Cool. And they wonder why Bush, a man who actually bragged about never once being out of the country until he became president, will go down as the worst president in the history of our nation. Pelosi is our own worst enemy for denying us impeachment proceedings, our most basic of Constitutional rights, and for encouraging the totally complicit democratic party, leaderless and spineless and clueless, to do nothing but cave. She should never be re-elected, sending the strongest message to those who influenced her and were most influenced by her, that we, the People, want our country back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq owes us for what?
Posted by: jfernst on Apr 28, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and his cronies kill 1 million Iraqis, destroy their infrastructure, displace half the population, and now want to bill them for it??? Give me a break! The Iraqis have MORE THAN PAID for our atrocities with their lives!

Let's GET OUT OF IRAQ and let the Iraqis run their own country -- just like they have with virtually no conflict for hundreds of year prior to our arrival to steal their oil!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to GET THE F**K OUTTA THERE...
Posted by: VickyinSD on Apr 28, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and turn the bills over to the criminals who initiated the whole mess in the first place!!!

We can sell all there properties, assets, etc. while they're sitting in prison... hopefully for the rest of their natural lives!

(I can always dream... can't I?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IRAQ TO PAY FOR ITS OWN DESTRUCTION
Posted by: Ipsi Dixit on Apr 28, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a cheek...! The audacity is breath-taking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

M.ROBBINS
Posted by: maryrco on Apr 28, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should apologize sincerely for invading thier country, give them that big old embassey, as small exchange for some of the bombing of thier country. Leave all the bases and structures and hope like hell they and the rest of the mid-east forgives us. Then throw this war-mongering administration in jail and hope in a hundred years we can regain our status as a democratic country, not an invasive bully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Carl Levin actually said:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 28, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the fighting in Basra and Baghdad demonstrates, we are being drawn deeper into what General Odierno described last week as an inter-communal conflict. And that conflict, which has nothing to do with Al Qaeda and everything to do with civil war, appears to be growing. There is consensus among the President’s supporters and critics alike that there is no military solution to this conflict and that there will be no end to it unless the Iraq political leaders take responsibility for their country’s future. An announcement of an open-ended pause in troop reductions starting in July would simply send the wrong message to the Iraqi leaders.

Rather, we need to put continuous and increasing pressure on the Iraqis:

to settle their political differences;
to pay for their own reconstruction with their oil windfalls; and
to take the lead in conducting military operations.

The way to do that is to adopt a reasonable timetable for a change of mission and redeployment of most of our troops. Promptly shifting responsibility to the Iraqis for their own future – politically, militarily, and economically – is the best hope for a successful outcome in Iraq and represents, finally, an exit strategy for most of our troops.


That's political speak. The reality here is that part of the U.S. leaving Iraq means ensuring that the Iraqi people have access to those funds. What if the al-Maliki government collapses, and they try and raid those funds?

Iraqi sovereignty requires that Iraqis have those funds - why are they being stashed in foreign banks? There is a huge, murky financial issue here - which also includes the ongoing theft of Iraqi oil due to bad meters.

I would not trust the media spin on this issue, in other words.

Another possibility is that the U.S. is trying to saddle Iraq up with massive, U.S.-owned debt as a final effort to control the oil wells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't using
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 28, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the proceeds from Iraq to pay for the reconstruction in the manner laid out by our Congress against the Geneva Convention?

I remember hearing that when the Bushitters proposed it during the buildup to the war, but never saw (or did) any followup.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dem Talking point
Posted by: warrior woman on Apr 29, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THis is a Democrat talking point. I heard it last week coming out of the mouth of the man running for Congress in my district. I gasped, no one else in the room caught the nuance. We're screwed. Neither the Dem's or Rep's are our true representatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They Should Pay Big Time
Posted by: robbrian123 on Apr 29, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is the first American Wartime president who has not negotiated reparations from a conquered country. Instead he lavishes the political elites with billions of $s to keep them in-line. Naturally they do not want us to leave, unlike 70% of Iraqis, who are suffering worse than under Saddam's rule.
Iraqi oil revenues are being kept in Western and Muslim banks and according to the IMF total about $600 billion, some of which is being used for Iraqi reconstruction.
If the Bush Criminal Conspiracy would permit the Iraqis to fully protect their oil fields the Iraqis could produce twice as much oil for global consumption. That would both reduce the price of retail gasoline, here and rapidly build Iraqi foreign exchange reserves to accelerate reconstruction there.

Instead just the opposite occurs which lines the pockets of the Bush Criminals and their Iraqi lackeys.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fuel prices
Posted by: eldoradoman1953 on Apr 29, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
right or wrong we now control all oil in iraq we should have 15 cent a gallon gas

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: fuel prices Posted by: Vian
NOTHING NEW
Posted by: fg on Apr 29, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I distinctly remember this idea being floated in the run-up to the war: Iraqi oil revenues would pay for this adventure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a catastrophe
Posted by: Vian on May 6, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US invaded Iraq, Kills and tortures Iraqis and they want them to pay of it??

The Iraqi People should sue the US government for act of aggression, the US congress for approving the war, US military for war crimes. An investigation should be lunched to find out how many accounts Iraq had in foreigner Banks and what did the US do with it who took it OR just look in Cheney’s bank account.

You people are no different than Saddam, Saddam use to execute people and go to their family and ask for the bullets price (it cost us money to kill your son).

Bush the US military are no different that Saddam and the his military

Don’t like you did the Iraqi any favors. They should sue the American people too for electing idiots to run their government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]