Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

John McCain's FEC Problem

Posted by Sir Charles of DC, Cogitamus at 2:53 PM on April 23, 2008.


$84 million in deadlocked in a bureaucratic tangle.
money

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Suzanne Braun Levine SuzanneBraunLevine.com

Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
Amanda Think Progress

Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

There is an interesting little drama unfolding involving the Bush Administration, Congress, and the Federal Election Commission that may have a significant impact on the McCain campaign and its ability to receive federal funds for the election.

The FEC is the administrative body charged with overseeing the nation's federal election laws.  It is run by a bipartisan commission with six members.  No more than three members of the FEC can belong to one party.

At the moment only two of those six seats are presently filled because of a battle over Bush nominee, Hans von Spakovsky.  Mr. von Spakovsky was a Justice Department official who was engaged in voter suppression efforts for the Republican Party -- a rather interesting qualification for an FEC member.  He served on the Commission as a recess appointment along with two Democratic appointees, former Chairman Robert Lenhard and member Steven Walther.  The Senate has remained continuously in session since the end of 2007 in order to prevent Bush from making further recess appointments to the FEC.  The Senate Democrats are insisting that von Spakovsky face an individual up or down vote rather than be paired with a Democratic nominee. The Bush Administration insists that it will not withdraw von Spakovsky's nomination.

As a result, the Commission lacks a quorum, rendering it unable to rule on whether McCain could withdraw from public financing and, more importantly, a quorumless FEC may be unable to authorize the release of $84 million in public funds now that McCain appears to have opted back into public financing.

After several months of this deadlock, Chairman Lenhard has announced his withdrawal from further consideration for renomination.  This almost certainly means further delay in achieving a quorum.

Given the stakes at issue, why won't the Bush Administration back down?  Well, you might say -- because they never back down on anything.  And you would be right to some extent.  However, I am told by reliable sources that the real driving force at this point is not the Administration, but rather Senator Mitch McConnell.  McConnell despises the FEC and John McCain -- he was the leading opponent of McCain Feingold in the Senate, and views the law as an almost personal affront.  Essentially he wants McCain to have to come to him on bended knee before he will consent to putting any nominee other than von Spakovsky up for consideration.

Evidently the Democratic leadership in the Senate has been consulting with the Obama campaign to get a sense of its position on these issues.  Perhaps not surprisingly, the Obama people have been unwilling to play hardball and have strongly indicated that they do not want to gum up the gears of the public financing for McCain, even if might be to their advantage to do so.

So for now, it is McConnell who stands between McCain and his $84 million payday.  It will be intriguing to see who blinks first in this little internecine war.   

Digg!

Tagged as: election, republicans

Sir Charles of DC blogs at Cogitamus.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
McWar Makes a Decision!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on Apr 24, 2008 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McWar Said:

1. I will accept public funding.

2. I will NOT accept public funding?

OK! Great decision!

Future decisions like this could cost you your LIFE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FEC & McCain
Posted by: Sissy on Apr 24, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When all is said and done, the FEC is going to be just one of McCain's monumental problems in the General Election coming up. That's why I would love to see the dems close up this primary season so we can get on with what's important. Making sure that he never steps foot in the White House except to have dinner with the president or some such thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]