Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

What The Candidates Consume More Important Than Policy

Posted by Brad , Sadly, No! at 9:59 AM on April 18, 2008.


Since when are culinary choices more important than policy?
23032972

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Welp, apparently Obama is now unqualified to be president because he eats vegetables.

I used to get a kick out of mocking the French. Now I realize they were right about us all along.

OH MY GOD. Roger Simon, channeling the goddamn Heathers:

Clinton’s statement was not as important as her downing that shot of whiskey. Presidential campaigning is about image making, and there is no better image than being a man (or woman) of the people. Who is actually less elitist or more in touch with average Americans makes little difference.

I am not sure that Hillary Clinton of Wellesley College and Yale Law School feels the pain of ordinary people any more keenly than Barack Obama of Columbia University and Harvard Law School. They are both lawyers who are married to lawyers. They are both millionaires. They both live in very nice houses. Wolves have not gathered at their doors in a long time. But while Americans place the office of the presidency on a pedestal and demand (though they do not always receive) higher standards from our presidents, we also demand that they be like us.

Goddammit you stupid preppy Villager asshole, I demand no such fucking thing. I don’t want the people I elect to government to down shots. I don’t want them to clear brush. I vote for them to run the goddamn government. What the hell is wrong with you demented freaks? This shit is important - it really matters to people. Both Clinton and Obama supporters give blood, sweat and tears to their candidates because they are sick and goddamn tired of our government being run by a pack of incompetent, war-mongering jack-offs and they want the government to be run by sane people for a change. I repeat: this shit is important. And if you don’t believe me, you can ask all those thousands of dead Iraqis if they give a rat’s ass whether the president of the United States likes to drink beer. Jesus H., you’re a grotesque monster.

Digg!

Tagged as: media, election, food

Brad is a regular blogger for Sadly No!.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why does Alternet keep posting blogs with ad hominem attacks?
Posted by: amalgamatedspats on Apr 18, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm under no illusions about the left being a place where a higher level of discourse takes place, but I'd really like to be under that illusion and Alternet is ruining it for me. Sigh.

Seriously though, there must be better blogs out there that Alternet can post.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good work, Brad
Posted by: JimmyVaughan on Apr 18, 2008 12:43 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've done a fine job of lowering the discourse here to the level of that filthy-mouthed, illiterate cracker who masquerades as "president of the United States".

Do you foam at the mouth, too?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good work, Brad Posted by: tommy_slothrop
righteous anger
Posted by: porgygirl on Apr 18, 2008 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I took the profanity as reflecting a degree of outrage that's entirely appropriate to the subject.

For a more eloquent reflection on a similar point, see the chaper in Sarah Vowell's wonderful _The Partly Cloudy Patriot_ about Al Gore. He was uniquely, incredibly, ridiculously well qualified to be president, but lost votes to someone utterly unprepared for the job because some voters thought Gore was a nerd. Vowell's point: shouldn't we *want* our president to be smarter than average?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Preach It
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 18, 2008 2:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over at HuffPo some granola is smacking on Obama because he smoked.
No wonder the Democratic Congress is as useless as a Bagpipe while Deer Hunting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PLAIN GARBAGE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 19, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop insulting us. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Need I remind the author Clinton voted for the Iraq War authorization and both vote to fund it
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Apr 19, 2008 2:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't want our leaders to be educated alone. How about principles?

Without having a guiding philosophical and moral belief system an educated leader can cause just as much damage as an ignorant leader and probably even more damage than an ignorant leader with good philosophical and moral principles.

Libertarianism is such a system: my body, my property, my choice pretty much sums it up.

The Democrats and Republicans put more emphasis on loyalty to party than to principles. And both don't have any problems imposing their views with the use of force, whether it is taxes, the police, or the DEA and FBI.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you gonna eat that salad?
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 20, 2008 4:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
looks good, mmmm...

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]