Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Abortion Art A Hoax?

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 4:08 AM on April 18, 2008.


Conservatives like Drudge are going crazy over a story about abortion art, but one blogger is skeptical.
o4101

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

After this was written, Yale announced that the art project was a hoax. We are reprinting this blog post anyway, because it shows how blogs can be useful in correcting misinformation.

What do you want to bet that this is a hoax?

Art student Aliza Shvarts claims that she induced multiple miscarriages for her senior project at Yale--according to a story in the Yale Daily News, linked above.

Allegedly, the sperm came from donors whom Shvarts declines to identify. She says she used "legal", "herbal" preparations to induce these miscarriages "as often as possible" over the course of nine months, and never consulted a doctor about her plan.

The "fabricators," or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.

Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself. [Yale Daily News]

The Daily News was unable to reach Shvarts' senior-project adviser before press time. So, really all we have to go on is the Daily News' account of the student's description of her project. It just so happens that there is no medical record of her experiment. She claims that she inseminated herself, but she won't say where she got the sperm. Her academic supervisor isn't available to confirm the details of the project.

This whole story seems tailored to whip up conservative hysteria. It's as if someone came up with a formula that incorporated all their favorite bugbears: Irresponsible sluts, frivolous abortions, liberal academia, and self-indulgent performance art.

If this is a hoax, someone is playing a very dangerous game. There are a lot of violent "pro-lifers" out there. The story has gone viral. It's been picked up by the likes of Michelle Malkin. I've already seen one blog post calling Shvarts a "murdering Jewess."

I have to question the editorial judgment of the Daily News for running this piece without at least getting an official comment from the art school or Shvarts's supervisor about the nature of her project.

Digg!

Tagged as: anti-choice, hoax, abortion

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Is it still a hoax if the show goes on?
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Apr 18, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure this post is due for another update, but last night the student disputed the hoax label and showed some video to the news:

But Shvarts reiterated Thursday that she repeatedly use a needleless syringe to insert semen into herself. At the end of her menstrual cycle, she took abortifacient herbs to induce bleeding, she said. She said she does not know whether or not she was ever pregnant.

“No one can say with 100-percent certainty that anything in the piece did or did not happen,” Shvarts said, “because the nature of the piece is that it did not consist of certainties.”

This afternoon, Shvarts showed the News footage from tapes she plans to play at the exhibit. The tapes depict Shvarts — sometimes naked, sometimes clothed — alone in a shower stall bleeding into a cup.


So at a minimum she created the videos and seemed prepared to go thorugh with the exhibit itself.

I'm curious how people will receive this and whether or not it makes a difference if the event was a "creative fiction" as Yale described (i.e. was a total fabrication with no supporting material) vs an actual art project that was put together for actual exhibit, even if the "abortion" part is "simulated".

Of course it is possible that after the initial attention, the student realized she had a larger audience than originally anticipated and made the videos after the news item to bolster her claim that the project was real. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Psycho
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Apr 18, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a nut. To actually do this, or even pretend to do this, to your body is ridiculous. There is a photo of her "studio" with the original article - - it looks like a room in an asylum. This woman needs help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Psycho Posted by: Lauren
WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 18, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reads like something put together by someone who wants attention. An attempt at being sensational. Why encourage it? ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHY BOTHER? Posted by: Lauren
» attention seeking Posted by: fluffmuffinmom