Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Will Personally Kill Colombian Labor Leaders if You Don't Pass His Stupid Trade Deal

Posted by BoRev, BoRev at 12:03 PM on April 9, 2008.


Or something like that ...

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Note from PEEK guest editor Joshua H: If you, like me, are constantly banging your head against the desk in response to the commercial media's coverage of Latin American politics, BoRev -- a rare pro-Venezuelan perspective --is a hilarious antidote. I read it every day, and you should too.

If we've learned anything about surviving the Bush era, it's this: As the number of Administration and Washington Post staff reiterating a single message increases, the probability of it all being one big, fat lie approaches one.

Yesterday our dumb president went on the teevee to force the legislative branch into a vote on a trade deal with Colombia within 90 days. And while Congress will be allowed to read and discuss the bill, they will not be permitted to amend it in any way, because of the democracy.

This trade pact is all very crucial, says Bush, because the murder rate of Colombian trade unionists has gone down this year, and you wouldn't want it to go back up now would you? Condi said basically the same thing in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, and of course the Post ran an editorial saying Obama must be crazy for "believing" the stories of violence at all, and on the right hand side of the same page George Will helpfully explains that last year "The murder rate of unionists was less than one-eighth the murder rate of Colombians generally."

Clearly we are just one Colin Powell power point presentation away from a never-ending blood spattered Colombian trade quagmire.

UPDATES: You won't know whether to laugh or cry over...today's AP story on how "Uribe's administration has encouraged assassinations of trade unionists who cause problems for companies"...the NYT piece on the ridiculously extravagant multi-million dollar lobbying campaign the Colombian government is financing...the fact that Mark Penn never actually quit or got fired from the Clinton campaign over all this in the first place...this newly-released report on the human rights tragedy that is Colombia...Dan Kennedy's report on "the Clintons' longstanding tolerance of human-rights abuses in Colombia."

Ed note: Also see the op-ed by Dem Reps. Michael Michaud and Phil Hare, two of the best legislators on trade.


Summers and Gibbs Both Get Jobs From Obama
Obama has selected Summers to lead National Economic Council, Gibbs as press secretary.
Post by Satyam Khanna. November 22, 2008.
Obama and a Paucity of Progressives
Obama is not a super progressive. But he may, be the most progressive person we could have possibly hoped to elect as President of the United States.
Post by Jane Hamsher. November 22, 2008.
Bush's Backward Sprint to the Finish: Shady Rules Passed in the Final Days
In its "sprint to the finish," the Bush administration is working tirelessly to enact or alter a wide array of federal regulations.
Post by Staff. November 22, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
THAT HEADLINE IS HORRIFIC AND COMPLETELY OFFBASE
Posted by: maribelle on Apr 9, 2008 1:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joshua, did you write that headline? "Bush Will Personally Kill Colombian Labor Leaders if You Don't Pass His Stupid Trade Deal." Wow.

You know, we expect the PEEK headlines to be a bit over the top, but this is ridiculous. Worse, IT DOESN'T EVEN COME CLOSE TO DESCRIBING THE ARTICLE.

This exageration on this site, especially on headlines, has gotten increasingly out of hand this season. It's reached National Inquirer "Big Foot has Elvis' Baby" levels with headlines like this one.

Please, you don't need to go that far to make your point--ever heard the expression "less is more"?
(No, I'm not a Bush fan--but don't you see how this makes us lose credibility?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Love the Headline. It has that ring of truth.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 9, 2008 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, maybe Bush himself isn't going to get out there and get dirty. He only whacks weeds, as you know.

You have to hate the manure pile that is politics, particularly trade politics, as practiced in this country. By the mere fact that the Wad in Chief is trying to lowball this thing in, we should understand that it won't pass a sniff test.

From the linked article about Uribe's administration encouraging assassinations, speaking about the killing:

"It is certainly down from 2002, which was a nightmare year," said Isacson. "What has not improved is punishment when it happens. The impunity rate of these killings is 98 or 99 percent."

Maybe the government assassins were on hiatus in Orlando for a while, to get in a little virtual reality training, because the article also says that the killing has resumed to its former level, with eleven union people killed in the previous month.

Are we still in awe of the great progress being made?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dual tracks
Posted by: talkville on Apr 10, 2008 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially in light of the on-going demonstrations and activity surrounding the role of China in regard to Tibet and issues of human rights and self-determination and justice and such, anyone REALLY interested in the current rail-roading of yet another neo-liberal and bi-lateral "trade" agreement with Colombia would do well to make a full and in-depth investigation into the origins and development of FARC-EP more than 20 years ago. Here we have a political, social and economic movement born of issues such as human rights, self-determination and issues of justice and such in a country 'occupied' in a slightly different way but the USA.

No one even vaguely familiar with the fuller dynamics of events in Colombia during these last 30 years would have any doubts as to "why deaths of unionists are down" nor as to why it is particularly important for the USA to continue to extend the network of "trade-agreements" begun with NAFTA to the southernmost point of the cone in the Americas.

We so GOOOOOOD; China so BAAAAAAD. Colombian peasantry and working class so BAAAAAAAD; Tibetan Buddhist so GOOOOOOD.

In a land where one is free to speak and to judge and to butter one's toast on either side according to how the mood and inclination strike, living is easy and simple. One is free to choose his or her justice and to change one's mind as self-interest might dictate; some among us call this quality "Moral Clarity".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We all know that Bush would never...
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 10, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
actually do the killing himself! How absurd! Nor would he have to when he has at his command an army of mercenaries that would gladly do the work for him!

He's too busy washing the blood of innocent Iraqis and our troops from his hands to dirty them up more with someone else's.

Thanks for the links, Joshua! (And keep the satire coming!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When I see
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 10, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the words "Bush" and "Colombia" in the same sentence - no, on the same page - the phrase "chop one out" is the 1st thing that comes to mind.
"Trade" deal, indeed.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overheard from a Colombian Labor Leader, who heard Bush's remark:
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Apr 10, 2008 8:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bring...him...ON!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come to think of it, the end of the "article" has all this as being
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Apr 10, 2008 8:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
--oooh....Bad! BAD! It's ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!!!

Uh...shouldn't alternet at least wait UNTIL HILLARY'S SWORN IN, before blaming her for all this???

Cause of course (by now) we all know where this is going: It's CLINTON'S FAULT. No matter that, during Clinton's Presidency--despite his having signed NAFTA into law, which the Repukes are trying to use to blame job losses on his Administration--, ALL AMERICA WORKED (and unlike today, made good money doing so!)! Remember going out for a burger and getting a JOB APPLICATION on the tray, with your filled order?

Bush, who signed in GAFTA--a much more far-reaching "trade agreement" giving away the store to the rest of the globe--oh no, it's not HIS FAULT that no American is working now--it's CLINTON'S FAULT! Remember--all those illegals, taking jobs that "...no Americans would do (for the HALF the minimum wage that is all that BushBuddy employers want to get away with paying..."???

Bush is right. Bush didn't originate NAFTA. He did, however, try to destroy our sovereign boundaries with his vile North American Union bullshit. He and his NeoCONS have mounted such an assault on America that, if they spoke Russian, we'd have dropped the Big One onto them and the world would have cheered. Now that these traitors to America are about to retire and not face any penalties for their numerous crimes--everybody forgets about how Bush wanted to destroy America in favor of this nebulous North American Union.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

of course Bush would say that
Posted by: TERRIROBSON on Apr 11, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering his father has STATED that he will use diplomatic efforts and if that does not work for opening up doors to American business then he will use a CROW BAR(military) Same genes same mindset.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GEORGE BUSH ALREADY HAS A HISTORY OF PARTICIPATING IN COLUMBIA'S
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Apr 15, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
best known export. Perhaps, he is trying to protect his supply. I actually didn't know a trade agreement was necessary for that. These people are already down and dirty anarchists. This is a position George supports at his convenience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]