Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

US Military Scrubs Deceased Gay Soldier's Wiki Entry

Posted by Pam Spaulding, Pam's House Blend at 2:00 PM on April 3, 2008.


Wow, how sick is this?
rogersallenthumb
Rogers

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Man, how sick is this? The recloseting by the media and the military of Maj. Alan Rogers, who served in Iraq and was posthumously awarded a Purple Heart and a second Bronze Star was bad enough, but now someone at the Pentagon decided that even Rogers Wikipedia entry needs to be de-gayed. (Washington Blade):

The user on Monday redacted details about Rogers that appeared on the online encyclopedia site. Information that was deleted included Rogers' sexual orientation; the soldier's participation in American Veterans for Equal Rights, a group that works to change military policy toward gays; and the fact that Rogers' death helped bring the U.S. military's casualty toll in Iraq to 4,000.
Rob Pilaud, a patent agent and a friend of Rogers who attended the soldier's funeral, restored the information to the Wikipedia article the next day. Pilaud was among Rogers' friends who created the Wikipedia page.

The anonymous poster also provided the following comment in the "discussion" section about the article:
"Alan's life was not about his sexual orientation but rather about the body of work he performed ministering to others and helping the defense of the country," the poster wrote. "Quit trying to press an agenda that Alan wouldn't have wanted made public just to suit your own ends."
The IP address attached to the deletion of the details and the posted comments is 141.116.168.135. The address belongs to a computer from the office of the Army Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence (G-2) at the Pentagon. The office is headed by Lt. Gen. John Kimmons, who was present at Rogers' funeral and presented the flag from Rogers' coffin to his cousin, Cathy Long.
The Army's public affairs office did not return a call seeking comment.

As we learned in the Chris Johnson's earlier Blade piece on Rogers, the late service member was hardly in the closet -- he went out to clubs in DC with and even served for a time as treasurer for American Veterans for Equal Rights working to end DADT.

More below the fold.

Rogers was closeted to the extent that he couldn't serve openly in the military because he would be discharged under the discriminatory law, not because he was uncomfortable with his homosexuality.

The media's role in this has been disturbing.  The WaPo simply omitted the information that Rogers was treasurer for American Veterans for Equal Rights.

Eric Hegedus, president of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists' Association, said the Post ombudsman deserves commendation for arguing that the Post could have gone further in the story.
Hegedus said it was ridiculous for the Post to omit that Rogers was a treasurer in the American Veterans for Equal Rights.
"If he was a former treasurer, it's something that he was passionate about and why wouldn't you mention something like that?" Hegedus asked.
Aside from Deborah Howell, Ombudsman for the WaPo, calling out her paper for ignoring how Rogers' orientation and DADT are relevant to the story, other outlets are making absurd claims that if true, sound like shabby reporting. NPR, for instance, says reporter Steve Inskeep didn't find out Rogers was gay.
Pilaud said it must have been "a lucky coincidence" that NPR did not find out that Rogers was gay because it was apparent at the funeral. Missing the gay flag and AIDS ribbon lapel pins on Rogers' friends would have been difficult, Pilaud said.
"If NPR made any effort at the funeral at Arlington National or if they did any kind of follow-up, I can't imagine how they could have missed that," Pilaud said.

Related:


* Media and military closets gay soldier killed in Iraq
* WaPo ombudsman: paper wrong to recloset deceased gay soldier  


Bush White House Has Its Own Interrogation Room
Usman Khosa, a Pakistani U.S. college graduate, was messing with his ipod on 16th street and found out about the room the hard way.
Post by Satyam. August 8, 2008.
Obama Speaks the Truth to a Child, Right-Wingers Go Bananas
The Right-wing media is in a tizzy over Obama's truthful comment.
Post by Steve M.. August 8, 2008.
Will Pakistan Impeach Pervez Musharraf?
Political change is afoot in Pakistan, but what does it mean for the U.S. and the War in Afghanistan?
Post by Booman. August 8, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
sue the military
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Apr 3, 2008 8:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they are engaging in defamation of character. changing anything that is the truth about this soldier is illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Army motto
Posted by: Dr T on Apr 4, 2008 3:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't ask, don't tell, but do censor.

As a former US Navy Commander, I remind the Army Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence that our oath was not to cover your ass from gay men (full pun intended) but to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having worked for Army public affairs
Posted by: kegbot1 on Apr 4, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of this surprises me. They're all about censorship despite their oath to protect the Constitution. It all depends on your definition of what the Constitution stands for I guess. To me, what many of them want is a peculiar American form of fascism.

I think this is a terrible attempt to defame the personhood of a soldier who was what he was and died defending a country that was supposed to stand for equal rights and justice for all. Perhaps those are now 'quaint' notions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having worked for Army public affairs
Posted by: kegbot1 on Apr 4, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of this surprises me. They're all about censorship despite their oath to protect the Constitution. It all depends on your definition of what the Constitution stands for I guess. To me, what many of them want is a peculiar American form of fascism.

I think this is a terrible attempt to defame the personhood of a soldier who was what he was and died defending a country that was supposed to stand for equal rights and justice for all. Perhaps those are now 'quaint' notions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tracable address
Posted by: e rice on Apr 4, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how incompetent, short-sighted and just plain stupid. more proof that military intelligence is an oxymoron--at least in this country.

having gay friends is not proof that one is gay oneself. while the civilian reporter may have been unobservant, surely sexual orientation is not the defining element of a person's character. he was a brave man, who worked for the betterment of his community. and there's no way to know if the reporter omitted his position as treasurer, or if the editor deleted it.

none of which excuses the army's actions. paranoia might.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How sad
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 4, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How sad and ironic that in a country that is SUPPOSED to epitomize freedom, a soldier, who died to (theoretically) preserve that "freedom" is not free to be who he really is.

America is no longer the land of the free and the home of the brave. The lyrics should be changed to "land of the oppressed closeted ones and home of the superficial facade of bravery that is masking spineless bullies."

Of course those lyrics aren't very lyrical, but perhaps they're a bit more accurate.

VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the hell is going on here?
Posted by: willymack on Apr 4, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this goddam "war" bringing out the worst in everybody or what? I'm reminded of a guy named Rehm, who was fanatically loyal to Hitler and headed up his Brownshirts. He was eliminated when it became common knowlege that he was GAY. The parallels between Hitler's regime and the current one here don't stop there, either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Apr 4, 2008 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HOMOPHOBES

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SOCRATES WAS BISEXUAL AND FOUGHT IN THE ATHENIAN ARMY. HAS EVERYONE FORGOTTEN
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Apr 9, 2008 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this or did they just never know. Bisexual and/or gay men fought back to back in pairs. It was believed that they were twice as effective because they had a vested interest in protecting their partner.

Why, why, why, have the American people allowed the issue of sexual orientation to become an issue? As I get to know people, I find that almost every family has at least one gay person. Why are we being so self destructive? This is plumb stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]