Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Glenn Beck Claims Wal-Mart Made a "Deal With Terrorists" by Ending Its Lawsuit Against a Brain Damaged Employee

Posted by Ali Frick, Think Progress at 5:20 AM on April 3, 2008.


The corporation was under no obligation whatsoever to sue the Shanks. It was a discretionary choice.
glennbeckcnn1115200601

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Sarah Palin's Reckless Approach to Health Care
Julia Eisman Stand Up for Health Care

Election Observer Arrested in Arizona
Steven Rosenfeld AlterNet

Will Sarah Palin Have An Effect on the Women's Vote?
Heather Gehlert AlterNet

Invoking a little-noticed clause in Shank’s contract that kicked in once she won a settlement with the trucking company, Wal-Mart sued the Shank family to recoup the medical expenses it had spent on her care, all $470,000.

In response, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann last week began decrying Wal-Mart’s actions nightly, four times labeling $9-billion corporation one of his “Worst Persons in the World.” Last night, however, Olbermann was able to announce the good news — that Wal Mart yesterday wrote to the Shanks to tell them it would drop its suit:

Occasionally others help us step back and look at a situation in a different way. This is one of those times. … Wal-Mart will not seek any reimbursement for the money already spent on Ms. Shank’s care, and we will work with you to ensure the remaining amounts in the trust can be used for her ongoing care.

Unfortunately, CNN’s Glenn Beck could not attain a similarly enlightened perspective. He condemned Wal-Mart on his radio show today, insisting the corporation had made a “deal with terrorists” and had succumbed to “blackmail”:

Well, what are the principles? The principles are right is right, wrong is wrong. No matter how much I need it, no matter how hard it is for me, no matter how much it sucks, it’s not right. My word is my bond. I made an agreement. I didn’t see it in there. … This is blackmail. And yet Wal-Mart folds. You don’t deal with terrorists? Really? You just did. You just dealt with economic blackmailers. … But then — and I don’t even put it on the family as much as I do on the media. The media, they just — MSNBC, man, they can just make hay with this.

Earlier in his rant, Beck seems to suggest that the Shanks reneged on Debbie’s contract when it asked Wal-Mart to forgive her medical expenses. However, as legal analyst Jeffery Toobin pointed out on Anderson Cooper 360 last night, the corporation was under no obligation whatsoever to sue the Shanks. It was a discretionary choice:

There is no reason why they should have filed this lawsuit. This was an unnecessary pain inflicted.

Digg!

Tagged as: beck, olbermann, shank, health, health care, walmart

Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Sarah Palin's Reckless Approach to Health Care
Just like John McCain, Palin is putting private market interests before consumers.
Post by Julia Eisman. September 7, 2008.
Election Observer Arrested in Arizona
Will cops crack down on election observers in November?
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. September 7, 2008.
Will Sarah Palin Have An Effect on the Women's Vote?
A recent survey shows mixed results.
Post by Heather Gehlert. September 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
legally right does not equate to morally right
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Apr 3, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
do corporations have morals? is it right to expect them to have morals? since corporations have personhood does that mean there should be the expectation of corporate morality? at what price, what dollar amount, what injury, should it kick in?

when do you stop seeing a human face and see a plaintiff. especially in matters like this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's the difference?
Posted by: uluro on Apr 3, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After winning a settlement in a lawsuit following an accident, I had to pay back BC/BS every penny they paid out for medical expenses. Most insurers have a clause that if you sue, they get their money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah that's right I'm a terrorist! NOT
Posted by: chuckjs on Apr 3, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So I threatened to boycott Wal-Mart. Glenn thinks that makes me a terrorist. Imagine that me, from a country that is not the US, enlisted and fought, in Afghanistan. I did this in defence of Glenn's country and the GWT. I actually did something to fight hate and destruction and a guy who promotes hate and bigotry behind the guise of "Entertaining" calls me a terrorist!

Glenn willfully ignores his sociatal, moral, ethical, and humanitarian responsibility to make this a much better world. He hides behind the right-wing talking point that he "is, after all, an entertainer and he IS entertaining". Glenn did you enlist and fight? Don't give me the age excuse, I enlisted at 40 years of age.

Glenn, one day you will pull your head out of your capitalist sphincter, and realize that your neighbor needs your help as much as you need your neighbors and it is YOUR responsibility to help them. Isn't that what a free democratic society is supposed to do. God even you and your country are trying to sell Iraq as some form of bringing freedom and democracy there. What a joke!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» really, tho Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: really, tho LOL Posted by: chuckjs
Lol, relaying facts loudly, in a national forum, is now terrorism...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 3, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and Glenn Beck is a purple monkey.

What Olberman did was give basic information and a healthy dose of "shame on you". I find it hard to believe that Wal-Wart was actually terrified at any point in time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And again....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 3, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another rightwing talking head compares another non-terrorist group to terrorists. Now... complain about a corporate policy that would bankrupt the family of someone with severe brain injury while giving money to a HUGE corporation that makes astronomical profits... and you're a terrorist.

The idea of what a terrorist is just keeps getting odder and odder.

Yeah, they are tough on terrorism.. as long as you want to expand the definition to include people who complain about corporate self-enrichment at the cost of injured employees or American soldiers who were injured in combat and dare to speak out against radio hosts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beck
Posted by: motamanx on Apr 3, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glenn Beck saw that Rush was making money by being divisive, so he thought he would cash in by acting in a similar way. That's it folks. That's the whole thing. He certainly is no "journalist".

The man is an empty suit and deserves no notice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More corpocracy BS
Posted by: bettyn on Apr 3, 2008 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from one of their shills. The old corporate Repuke line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOYCOTT WAL MART
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Apr 3, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal Mart by their greedy actions, forced this family man who has cancer and recently lost his son in Iraq to divorce his wife in order to get medicaid. For God's sakes, what has the American Corporations, CEO's, Board of Directors done to this country? Put us in Moral bankruptices to further their greed, how many more "PIGS" are there in Arkansas, or should I say Razorback Hogs? Consider this, most of their stock comes from China, who runs sweat shops for children, I thought we got rid of Slave labor, perhaps Wally's World Corporation should move to China!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kool Aid side effects
Posted by: outlander55 on Apr 3, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glenn Beck is an asshole of the "N"th degree. This is what happens when one drinks the Kool Aid a little too often. Detatchment from reality and a sense of loathing of anything resembling of compassion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let me guess, 9 out of 10 of you shop at WalMart.
Posted by: joeunix on Apr 3, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You want to put WalMart and corporate America in its place?

Stop shopping.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I can't believe I'm saying this, Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Give yourself some time Posted by: joeunix
Glen Beck reaches a new low
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 3, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only a highly deranged egghead could look at this case and side with Wal Mart.

Economic terrorist blackmail? Oh please. How about labeling Wal Mart a hopelessly greedy, non-feeling corporate bully? How about recognizing as totally unacceptable a health care system that thinks bankrupting a brain damaged invalid is good policy. Rather than leave her penniless, it'd probably be more humane to take her out behind the barn and shoot her.

VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Come to Canada Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: Come to Canada Posted by: Grandma Crabby
A call for a boycott is not enough
Posted by: djnoll on Apr 3, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After first reading about this story, even before Keith Olbermann did his wonderful thing again, I thought long and hard about what could be done. A boycott of their stores would be great, but too many people do not understand what Wal-Mart is or what it does to people and communities. So, I discussed this case with my husband, and we realized that we can buy everything we need at other stores in the area, so it is not too difficult for us to boycott Wal-Mart and Sam's Club, even though it will be a financial stretch for us. But what about the communities that Wal-Mart has decimated? IN the town of Burlington, CO, for example, the Wal-Mart 30 miles away in Goodland, KS has driven many of the businesses that were once in Burlington out of business, and the ones that are left are struggling to survive. Even the grocery stores are down to a Safeway and Burlington Foods, which is really a glorified convenience store. What about small towns that did not stand by local business owners and brought in Wal-Mart, where do they go now?

It is time to start a national campaign that would incorporate not only shopping at other stores, but restoring local businesses that can compete with stores like Wal-Mart in providing goods and services. It means local banks will have to step up and give business loans at low rates; local suppliers of goods will have to start selling only to local or regional businesses, not shipping their goods to other markets because Wal-Mart will not buy from them; people will have to find other resources to buy from, such local department stores, hardware stores, electronics stores and if they are not there yet, ask why and encourage them to come to their towns. It also means that people will have to do without for some things for a while as these businesses get up and going, but they can fill in by shopping online if the need is too great or try K-Mart if you must.

In short, Americans are the only ones that can take a company like Wal-Mart and undo the damage that they have done to this country. It is time to demand that our local leaders stop cowering before corporations and start supporting their citizens. It is time for local and regional banks to step up to the plate and develop loan programs for small businesses that can encourage them to stay in communities as they rebuild business networks and new consumer bases. It is time for local and regional banks to support local agricultural efforts, through not only reasonable agricultural food production development loans, but also through loans to start regional farmer's markets or agribusiness efforts on a local or regional scale. It is time for American citizens to demand such actions and demand that corporations like Wal-Mart leave their communities for good.

DO NOT JUST BOYCOTT THEIR BUSINESS, SHUT IT DOWN BY DRIVING IT OUT OF OUR COMMUNITIES AND RETURNING OUR COMMUNITIES TO ITS CITIZENS AND ITS BUSINESSES! AND DO THIS TO EVERY BUSINESS IN YOUR COMMUNITY THAT HARMS THE CITIZENS OF THAT COMMUNITY!

http://www.standanddeliveramerica.com

http://www.celdf.org - a website on changing community laws and regulations to protect the community from corporate predators as well as The Democracy School site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GLENN BECK IS THE TERRORIST!
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 3, 2008 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SOOO, Glen gets a pass , but Rachel M.
Posted by: jwpa13 on Apr 4, 2008 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gets her butt kicked off the air ? There is justice somewhere.

I hope your karma gets you all you deserve, GB.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Glenn Beck
Posted by: modeler on Apr 7, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone with the name Beck should be embarassed by the rantings of this lamebrain. I tried to watch him occasionally but turned off in disgust. He definitely is a ranting know nothing (not to call him an idiot) neo-con Bushit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow CNN
Posted by: reinaldok on Apr 7, 2008 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are some who really think that CNN is a bit different. Actually it is finally coming out the the famous LUCE -Time elements are still running their ultra-right dog and pony show. Why else would they put up with Beck and company?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GB Corporate Shill
Posted by: ibivi on Apr 8, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband watches GB and I make him put on the headphones. I've told him that GB is a total creep but he likes him. Maybe it's a guy thing. GB is so anti rights for ordinary people it is disgusting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]