Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Al Gore Launches $300 Million Climate Change Initiative, Meanwhile Bush Keeps Torturing

Posted by Scarecrow , Firedoglake at 8:13 AM on March 31, 2008.


Two contrasting stories on CBS' 60 Minutes illustrated for the hundredth time why selecting the right person for President matters.
image3974328g
Gore

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Two contrasting stories on CBS' 60 Minutes illustrated for the hundredth time why selecting the right person for President matters. In 2000, the American people made the right choice in voting for Al Gore over George Bush, but five conservative justices of the Supreme Court overruled the people and instead installed perhaps the most lawless regime in American history. We have paid a huge price for the Court's lawless dishonesty.

The imprisonment and torture of innocent people. President Bush surrounded himself with men and women who have little respect for the rule of law but plenty of zeal for giving the executive branch expanded powers unchecked by the Constitution. The created a Justice Department without integrity that sanctioned massive warrantless spying on Americans, kidnapping, rendition, secret prisons, indefinite imprisonment, the suspension of habeas corpus, kangaroo trials and torture. And the Administration is still lying about it all.

From 60 Minutes' story of the innocent German man we kidnapped, tortured and held for years at Guantanamo long after authorities knew he was completely innocent:

(CBS) At the age of 19, Murat Kurnaz vanished into America's shadow prison system in the war on terror. He was from Germany, traveling in Pakistan, and was picked up three months after 9/11. But there seemed to be ample evidence that Kurnaz was an innocent man with no connection to terrorism. The FBI thought so, U.S. intelligence thought so, and German intelligence agreed. But once he was picked up, Kurnaz found himself in a prison system that required no evidence and answered to no one.
The story Kurnaz told 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley is a rare look inside that clandestine system of justice, where the government's own secret files reveal that an innocent man lost his liberty, his dignity, his identity, and ultimately five years of his life.
. . .
"Have you ever in your legal career run across anything like this?" Pelley asks [detainee counsel] Baher Azmy.
"In my legal career, no," Azmy says. "But in Guantanamo, no detainee has ever been able to genuinely present evidence before a neutral judge. And so as absurd as Murat Kurnaz's case is, I assure you there are many, many dozens just as tenuous."

The campaign to save the planet. Had we had an honest Supreme Court, we would have had a very different man as President. However he might have responded to 9/11, it is certain Al Gore would never have invaded Iraq and equally certain he would never have destroyed the Constitution's Bill of Rights through illegal spying on Americans, nor would he have trampled on statutes and treaties outlawing abuse of prisoners and torture for the sake of a mindless "global war on terror." But our nation would have been leading a global effort to deal with the threat of climate change.

From 60 Minutes' interview with Al Gore:

When Al Gore ran for president in 2000, he was often ridiculed as inauthentic and wooden. Today he is passionate and animated, a man transformed. His documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," won an Oscar, and last year he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Now he's a certified celebrity, the popular prophet of global warming, and has helped change the way the country thinks about the issue.

And yet while 70 percent of Americans believe global warming is a big problem, they still rank it near the very bottom of their list of top 25 concerns.
And so Al Gore is about to wage a new campaign to emphasize the urgency of what he says is the greatest challenge facing our time.

It also matters whom we select as Vice President. When Lesley Stahl noted that Dick Cheney dismisses the validity of global warming, Gore observed,

"I think that those people are in such a tiny, tiny minority now with their point of view. They're almost like the ones who still believe that the moon landing was staged in a movie lot in Arizona and those who believe the earth is flat. That demeans them a little bit, but it's not that far off."

In his next speech, George Bush will tell us again why we have to spy on Americans, or occupy Iraq indefinitely. Nobel Laureate and Oscar winner Al Gore will soon launch a $300 million advertising campaign to convince the world we need to act on global warming.

Digg!

Tagged as: torture, cheney, bush administration, global warming, gore, 60 minutes, kurnaz

Scarecrow is a regular blogger for FireDogLake


Cheney Looks Awkward as Pelosi Interrupts Him to Applaud Obama's Victory
Vice President Cheney stood before Congress and read the official results of the 2008 presidential election. It's now officially official.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC, and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Draft Gore?
Posted by: uluro on Mar 31, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, where is the Draft Gore for President movement? While we bicker about Clinton vs Obama vs McCain, none are as qualified as Al Gore. Someone, anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So Damn Close
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 31, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I recall, back in 2000 the media portrayed Al Gore and George W Bush as not that different. And Al Gore's choice for VP didn't help matters any either.
But, damn, how close we came to a MUCH MUCH better world! Fewer than 500 votes in Florida (and much more Floridans than that mistakenly voted for Pat Puke-cannon instead of Gore because of that state's "butterfly ballot"), only 1 vote on the Supreme Court. SO DAMN CLOSE!

And now, now John McCain is portrayed by the media as a "maverick" and as a moderate.
But mark my words. If McCain wins (or steals) the presidency, we will be VERY VERY sorry! Let us not again make the mistake of assuming that the Democrat and Republican candidates are not that different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sacred Cow
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Mar 31, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To hear discussion of Al Gore today, you'd think he's an infallible champion of progressivism. But we should all take a good look at his history of decision making because it runs contrary to the praise that's constantly heaped upon him.

We hear over and over that if he were in office, we wouldn't have invaded Iraq, but that's pure conjecture. There's good reason to believe he would have followed the same couse of action as Bush because 1)He had the poor judgement to pick Joe Lieberman as his running-mate, who we've found to be one of the most aggressive proponents of this war. So it's safe to assume that Lieberman would have had a strong influence on Gore's decision-making., 2)He comes from a family steeped in oil company culture and profits. His dedication to oil company interests was made clear by his refusal to use his considerable influence to dissuade Occidental Petroleum from drilling in indigenous Colombian lands. and 3)Initiating another ground invasion of Iraq would have been a natural progression of the Clinton policy of bombing and starving Iraq, which to my knowledge, Gore did nothing to stop.

As an author and film subject, he's done a great job of presenting himself as an ardent advocate of environmental causes. But his support for free trade policies undercuts his supposed commitment to the environment. How much thought did he give to the environmental consequences of NAFTA and granting PNTR status to China?

It's certainly a shame that Gore had the presidency stolen away from him. But we shouldn't forget that he did vote to confirm Scalia's nomination to the Supreme Court, so he has to take partial responsibility for allowing the Court to be dominated by right-wing partisans.

Had he taken office as the majority of 2000 voters had hoped, he may have been a fine president. But the fact is we'll never know, so it doesn't do us any good to pretend otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did not see 60 minutes
Posted by: crazy carlos on Mar 31, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but I did finish reading "Six Degrees". If this guy is even half way close, the people of the world are in a world of shit and we have about 7 years to get the problem solved or because of organic reasons within the system itself Mother Nature is going to solve it for us.

Global Warming is THE #1 problem according to Six Degrees and the time frame is posing an almost overwhelming picture of a catastrophe in the making. Crazy Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The truth about Al Gore and his "Global Warming" scam.
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 31, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Professor Richard Lindzen, is an atmospheric physicist and the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT.

Question: How cynical do you think Gore is?

Answer: It's hard for me to tell. I think he's either cynical or crazy. But he has certainly cashed in on something. And 'cash in' is the word. The movie has cleared $50-million. He charges $100,000-$150,000 a lecture. He's co-founder of Global Investment Management, which invests in solar and wind and so on. So he is literally shilling for his own companies. And he's on the on the board of Lehman Brothers who want to be the primary brokerage for emission permits.

Question: That sounds more cynical, less crazy.

Answer: I think his aim is not to be president. It's to be a billionaire.

Read the remainder of the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pls go here Posted by: Drclaw
» Thanks for the response. Posted by: joeunix
» joeunix gets hysterical Posted by: particle
» Hysterical? Hardly. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Hysterical? Hardly. Posted by: particle
» Garbage in, garbage out. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Garbage in, joeunix out. Posted by: particle
» RE: Garbage in, particle out. Posted by: particle
» World Climate Report. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: World Climate Report. Posted by: particle
» RE: World Climate Report. Posted by: particle
» RE: World Climate Report. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: World Climate Report. Posted by: particle
» so am I... Posted by: Drclaw
what
Posted by: lgrf4evr on Mar 31, 2008 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey jiloser,

I find it sad that you accuse anyone who believes in global warming as money hungry corrupt individual while portraying global warming denial tobacco scientist as pristine, pure individuals who minds had never been influence by the amount of money that they rake in from the oil executives.

I will admit that al gore is wrong if you admits that your precious scientist or whatever that you trout out is a tobacco scientist who is trying to make billions of dollars by spreading lies.

Beside, what is that you are afraid of? Don't give me the debate about being fair and balance for both side of the story, there was overwhelming evidence that there was no WMD but that didn't stop bush from using selected evidence to invaded and genocide the people did it?

No, I think that you just hate anything that is not pro oil, and are trying your best to keep from developing alternative fuels. Hey, how much money did your oil scientist send to you today?

Beside, that tobacco scientist can't even agree between himself and herself about the weather and you want me to believe you vicious claims?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Irrelevant Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Irrelevant Posted by: particle
» "pernicious"? I think not. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: "pernicious"? I think not. Posted by: particle
» RE: "pernicious"? I think not. Posted by: Squarehead
Perhaps Bush and Cheney have made me a bit cynical
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 1, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But lets face it. When someone says "this is what is best for the world" and it happens to be something that puts money directly into THEIR pocket, I tend to be a bit skeptical.

I've read tons of research on global warming, and I've come to the educated opionion of "Nothing is proven, either way".

I've also decided that I don't care about global warming, since I'm not sure if it exists or not.

However, I do care about AIR POLLUTION. We need to cut down on carbon emissions, regardless of global warming, just to have better air quality! Has anyone else noticed the increase in asthmatics in the last 2 decades?

Lets get rid of the fossil fuel plants and install nuclear power plants, so that we can BREATHE better again. Then, if Gore is right, and there is global warming, no big deal, it's a side benefit. If he's wrong, we can still breathe, and that by itself, makes it worth it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]