Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Can Al Gore Save the Democratic Party?

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 11:44 AM on March 27, 2008.


We should probably get ready for a new wave of Gore-related scuttlebutt, centered around a new idea: Al Gore, compromise candidate.
salgorelarge
Gore

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The political world spent a fair amount of time last year mulling over whether Al Gore would run for president, who his running mate would be, whether he could win, etc. Once it became clear that Gore wouldn’t run, speculation shifted to who he’d endorse, when, and what kind of impact it might have.

Now, however, we should probably get ready for a new wave of Gore-related scuttlebutt, centered around a new idea: Al Gore, compromise candidate.

The first I heard of this was earlier this week, when Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-Fla.), considering the prospects of a brokered convention, told a Florida paper, “If it (the nomination process) goes into the convention, don’t be surprised if someone different is at the top of the ticket.”

A compromise candidate could be someone such as former vice president Al Gore, Mahoney said last week during a meeting with this news organization’s editorial board.
If either Clinton or Obama suggested to a deadlocked convention a ticket of Gore-Clinton or Gore-Obama, the Democratic Party would accept it, Mahoney said.

The comments didn’t generate much in the way of attention, in part because Mahoney isn’t an especially high profile lawmaker, and also because he made the remark to a small paper with a limited audience.

But when Time’s Joe Klein starts talking about the same idea, one gets the sense a small boomlet might be in the works.

As Klein sees it, Clinton is highly unlikely to overtake Obama before the convention, and even if she did, what she’d have to do to earn it would make it very difficult for her to win the general election. Obama, on the other hand, has been weakened, Klein argues, by Clinton’s criticisms and the coverage of the Jeremiah Wright story, the latter of which might make it tough for Obama to win support from working-class whites.

Given this, Klein has an idea.

He will probably do well enough to secure the nomination. But what if he tanks? What if he can’t buy a white working-class vote? What if he loses [Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Indiana] badly and continues to lose after that? I’d guess that the Democratic Party would still give him the nomination rather than turn to Clinton. But no one would be very happy — and a year that should have been an easy Democratic victory, given the state of the economy and the unpopularity of the incumbent, might slip away.

Which brings us back to Al Gore. Pish-tosh, you say, and you’re probably right. But let’s play a little. Let’s say the elders of the Democratic Party decide, when the primaries end, that neither Obama nor Clinton is viable. Let’s also assume — and this may be a real stretch — that such elders are strong and smart enough to act. All they’d have to do would be to convince a significant fraction of their superdelegate friends, maybe fewer than 100, to announce that they were taking a pass on the first ballot at the Denver convention, which would deny the 2,025 votes necessary to Obama or Clinton. What if they then approached Gore and asked him to be the nominee, for the good of the party — and suggested that he take Obama as his running mate? Of course, Obama would have to be a party to the deal and bring his 1,900 or so delegates along.
I played out that scenario with about a dozen prominent Democrats recently, from various sectors of the party, including both Obama and Clinton partisans. Most said it was extremely unlikely … and a pretty interesting idea. A prominent fund raiser told me, “Gore-Obama is the ticket a lot of people wanted in the first place.” A congressional Democrat told me, “This could be our way out of a mess.”

I have nothing but enthusiastic admiration for Gore, but this scenario strikes me as wildly far-fetched — and maybe a little too deep into wishful-thinking territory.

I doubt there will be a brokered convention; I doubt Gore would demonstrate any interest in being a compromise candidate; I doubt delegates would reject a candidate who enters the convention with more delegates, states, and popular votes; I even doubt delegates would consider someone (even Gore) who hasn’t run in a single primary or caucus.

This almost certainly just won’t happen. But that doesn’t mean we won’t be hearing more about it in the coming days.

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, gore, democratic party

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
oldfreedomdude
Posted by: oldfreedomdude on Mar 27, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Early on, I would have welcomed Gore as a candidate, but after going through the whole primary process, and having seen Obama win it fair and square, and with honor, while the Clintons sank into gutter politics, I, for one, would be very angry if the DNC were to suddenly intervene and take it away from Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Obama hasn't WON anything Posted by: Andie927
» ! Posted by: 23skidoo
» RE: oldfreedomdude Posted by: Ambercat
» RE: oldfreedomdude Posted by: sui_generis
If it were, Gore-Edwards
Posted by: Andie927 on Mar 27, 2008 1:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would actually consider coming back to the Democratic Party!!

Both Obama and Clinton, are flawed candidates, that have played dirty! Both are way to deeply indebted to Big Money Special Interests!

Gore always should have been the nominee, Edwards has all the Great Progressive/Populist ideas! Yea, I could get behind that! Now, that would be real change, we can not only live with, but live better because of!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ! Posted by: 23skidoo
» RE: If it were, Gore-Edwards Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid Posted by: Andie927
» RE: Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
Yep...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 27, 2008 1:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still just more waiting around for Saint Gore to save us all.

Yet another reason the Democrats are so utterly pathetic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Gore?
Posted by: realveive on Mar 27, 2008 1:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why ever would the Dems want Al running again? His lousy 2000 campaign is a major reason we've had numbnuts in the White House for over seven years. Let Gore keep on the global warming situation where he might be able to do some good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gore didn't lose Posted by: binkey
Get to know Al Gore
Posted by: Rune on Mar 27, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that the purpose of life is to glorify God. . . .
Source: Kevin Sack, NY Times Oct 23, 2000

I support a comprehensive strategy to prevent teen pregnancy and transmission of sexually transmitted diseases that includes abstinence education and other measures.
Source: Associated Press Sep 22, 2000

We should encourage more private support for faith-based organizations.

[. . .]

I call on the corporations of America to encourage and match contributions to faith- and values-based organizations. For too long, faith-based organizations have wrought miracles on a shoestring. With the steps I’m proposing today, they will no longer need to depend on faith alone.

Source: Gore's speech on Faith-Based Organizations, Atlanta GA May 24, 1999

If I am entrusted with the presidency, I will launch a sweeping anti-crime strategy to make our families safe and secure. I will intensify the battle against crime, drugs, and disorder in our communities.
As crime and fear grew, too many families became afraid to live up to their own responsibilities and help take back their communities from the thugs and the dealers.

[. . .]

President Clinton and I thought we needed a tougher and more comprehensive strategy to fight crime on every single front. . . . And tougher punishments, including the death penalty for those who dared to penalize the innocent.

Source: Gore's speech in Atlanta GA May 2, 2000

Gore said he would push for “tougher drug penalties and enforcement,” would increase drug interdiction efforts, would expand drug courts and would institute a $2 billion national media campaign targeted at preventing youth from using drugs. He is supportive of Plan Colombia [which fight drugs via the Colombian military].
Source: Boston Globe, p. A21 Mar 5, 2000

Q. Would you press for the lifting of sanctions against Cuba?

A. No, I’m a hardliner on Castro. . . .

Source: Press Interview in Ohio Oct 4, 2000

Q: If you had been president, would any of these military interventions not have happened: Lebanon?
A: That was a mistake.
Q: Grenada?
A: I supported that.
Q: Panama?
A: I supported that one.
Q: Persian Gulf?
A: Yes, I voted for it, supported it.
Q: Somalia?
A: That was ill considered. I did support it at the time. In retrospect the lessons there are ones that we should take very seriously.
Q: Bosnia.
A: Oh, yes.
Q: Haiti?
A: Yes.
Q: And then Kosovo.
A: Yes.

Source: Presidential Debate at Wake Forest University Oct 11, 2000

Al Gore also picked fellow hawk and Democratic sell out, Joe Lieberman as his running mate.

And, as Jim Hightower has noted, Al Gore has a track record of selling out to corporate polluters, despite his years of rhetoric about how dedicated he is to environmental issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get to know Al Gore Posted by: Fabienne
No Gore
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Mar 27, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a one party system. This is not a democracy where the citizens are informed and have a fair and accurate voting system.

I do not trust Gore. I would not want to see him run.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Gore, what a joke.
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 28, 2008 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean the Al Gore who just happens to be one of "bonny" Prince Charles best friends? How many of you lemmings know that "bonny" Prince Charles wants the World's population reduced by 90%? How many of you know that Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" (which should bear the title "A Very Convenient Lie") is propaganda designed to justify the implementation of genocidal austerity in the Third World, which, by the way, will spearhead the above mentioned 90% reduction of the World's population (genocide)?

You mean the same Al Gore who lives in an enormous mansion in Tennessee, which just happens to cost $45,000 per year just to heat, while he wags his finger in our face and insists that we "work together" to stop alleged "Global Warming"? And guess who will live in austerity to "achieve this lofty goal"? Let me give you a clue: It won't be Al Gore who lives in austerity, it will be you.

You mean the Al Gore who lectures you about "Global Warming", while he remains one of the largest stockholders in Occidental petroleum?

You mean the Al Gore who, via his huge block of stock in Occidental Petroleum, laughs all the way to the bank while you pay ever and ever higher prices at the gas pump?

You mean the Al Gore who conspired with George Bush to lose the 2000 presidential election thereby allowing Bush and Cheney to implement a secret energy policy, which allows Al Gore to make millions via his control of huge stock holdings in Occidental Petroleum?

Al Gore isn't your friend and he's not your neighbor any more than George W. Bush or Dick Cheney are your friend/neighbor.

Gore is an uber-elite, and a genocidal monster. And as such he's your enemy, all the b******** propaganda produced in his name notwithstanding.

Get a clue, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Al Gore, what a joke. Posted by: bravegirl68
» Prove it. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Al Gore, what a joke. Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» Hey, Granny Posted by: joeunix
Al running? Great idea!
Posted by: PJAW on Mar 28, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Running as fast as possible..., while holding hands with the Clintons, the Bushes, the Cheneys and just about everyone else who has had their hands on the levers of government over the last 30 years. Run..., run south as fast as you can..., and when you get to Patagonia... JUMP... as far as you can

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Gore to the rescue - again
Posted by: Julian on Mar 28, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Project for the New American Century is in trouble. Hillary Clinton is their fallback - loyal servant on the key issues of domestic fascism and aggressive war, in case McCain blows it, as he very likely will. But along comes Obama, learning and maturing day by day into a candidate who actually might make a difference, might inspire Americans to take back their country. So sure the corp[orate backroom fixers may ask Al Gore to come to the rescue. After all, he's done it before when he folded during the standoff over the Florida ballot fraud. Anyone who saw the film Fahrenheit 911 will recall the unedifying spectacle of him rejecting black protesters, one by one, as they sought to be heard in the Senate over the massive fraud - not just the rigging of the count but the decisive exclusion of large numbers of African-American voters from the polls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow! Have you changed since 2000?
Posted by: Andie927 on Mar 28, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read, (some time ago) the New American Century, I don't recall Al Gore's name on it!
Jeb Bush's name was sure there.

Lieberman was the 'Parties' choice as a running mate for Al Gore, not his! (By the way your savior Obama went and campaigned for LIeberman in CT., After he lost the Dem. Primary)

I saw the movie F9/11, I don't recall the scene your referring to, unless your talking about Barbara Lee, trying to speak out. It was a Senate Hearing, he need a Senator to stand up, she's a member of the House, she had no standing! He as VP, was the Senate Pres. and "couldn't" do anything!

I believe, people can change. Esspecially over a matter of YEARS, and when major tramatic events occur in their life!

Al Gore's 'house' is also his office! The size of his house has nothing to do with his value as a human being, or his ability to speak out about Global Warming!!(I believe, he buy's carbon off-sets, as he does for his air travel)

(It's like all the 'garbage' talk about John Edwards house, as it turned out, he had to re-invest the money from the sale of his Wahington DC, home)

Look at the $1.5 Million dollar Obama House in Chicago! Pretty fancy, on a Senator's salary!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GORE
Posted by: pfm on Mar 28, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I have watch Obama over these past months the enthusiasm I once had that Al Gore might be the savior “white knight” for our nation has diminished, though it is not completely vanished. I am truly not quite sure what I am waiting to see in or from Obama, but there is a something about the picture he presents which remains for me a bit diffused. And perhaps it is my own inability to frankly trust and believe any politician…?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still for Gore
Posted by: sgparry on Mar 28, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I still have my "DraftGore.com" bumpersticker firmly pasted on my car. If only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Gore?
Posted by: Dianka on Mar 28, 2008 4:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heaven forbid. Al Gore is a one-trick pony: environment. Beyond that, he has proved to be a solid corporatist who worked long and hard to chop away at the New Deal policies that were vital to creating a massive middle class in the US. Al Gore was a leading force behind raiding the social safety net to finance years of tax "relief" for the wealthy. Then there is NAFTA, which gave working class Americans the unique "honor" of paying taxes to move our jobs to foreign nations.

In whole, this entire scheme sounds like a plan to negate the votes of all Democrats, having the DLC alone choose the next president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't confuse "the environment" Posted by: JoshuaLudd
poppyphil@hotmail.com
Posted by: poppaphil2007 on Mar 28, 2008 5:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gimme a break. Al Gore doesn't wish to be the President because he doesn't want his good work to be constrained by the political realities of being the President. The office of the president has been forever de-valued by the present administration's incalculable number of gaffes. No president can ever be trusted again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Joe Klein!
Posted by: howmad1 on Mar 28, 2008 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who the hell is Joe Klein, and what makes him such an expert on Al Gore? Isn't he the guy who does'nt take too kindly to any Democrats?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets Hope he comes to save America from an Anti-American supporter
Posted by: niliadis on Mar 30, 2008 3:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great Article: Read-get informed..
mother was referring to? To equate her fears, similar to Jesse Jackson’s, with Wright’s anti-American, anti-white, anti-Jew, and anti-Israel rantings is despicable coming from a grandson. In today’s vernacular, he threw her under the wheels of the bus to keep his presidential campaign rolling. For shame.

What is it that I and others expected Obama to do? A great leader with conscience and courage would have stood up and faced down anyone who engages in such conduct. I expect a president of the United States to have the strength of character to denounce and disown enemies of America — foreign and domestic — and yes, even his friends and confidants when they get seriously out of line.

What if a minister in a church attended primarily by white congregants or a rabbi in a synagogue attended primarily by Jews made comparable statements that were hostile to African-Americans? I have no doubt that the congregants would have immediately stood up and openly denounced the offending cleric.

Others would have criticized that cleric in private. Some would surely have ended their relationships with their congregation. Obama didn’t do any of these things. His recent condemnations of Wright’s hate-filled speech are, in my opinion, a case of too little, too late.

It is also disturbing to me that Obama’s wife, Michelle, during a speech in Wisconsin last month, said, “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country, because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.”

Strange. This is a woman who has had a good life, with opportunities few whites or blacks have been given. When she entered Princeton and Harvard and later became a partner in a prestigious law firm, didn’t she feel proud to be an American?

When she and the senator bought their new home, was there no feeling of accomplishment and pride in being a U.S. citizen? When her husband was elected to the state legislature and subsequently to the United States Senate, didn’t she feel proud of her country?

Obama was asked if he thought his speech changed any minds. He replied he didn’t think so, and certainly not of those who weren’t already for him. A more important question is, whether his 20-year relationship with Wright has done lasting damage to his candidacy.

We will soon know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]