Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Meet the White Man Who Inspired Wright's Controversial Sermon

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 7:26 AM on March 22, 2008.


Meet the man who inspired Reverend Jeremiah Wright's now famous tirade about America's foreign policy inciting the terrorist attacks of September 11.
The Real Wright

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Meet the man who inspired Reverend Jeremiah Wright's now famous tirade about America's foreign policy inciting the terrorist attacks of September 11.

His name is Ambassador Edward Peck. And he is a retired, white, career U.S. diplomat who served 32-years in the U.S. Foreign Service and was chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq under Jimmy Carter -- hardly the black-rage image with which Wright has been stigmatized.

In fact, when Wright took the pulpit to give his post-9/11 address -- which has since become boiled down to a five second sound bite about "America's chickens coming home to roost" -- he prefaced his remarks as a "faith footnote," an indication that he was deviating from his sermon.

"I heard Ambassador Peck on an interview yesterday," Wright declared. "He was on Fox News. This is a white man and he was upsetting the Fox News commentators to no end. He pointed out, a white man, an ambassador, that what Malcolm X said when he got silenced by Elijah Muhammad was in fact true: America's chickens are coming home to roost."

Wright then went on to list more than a few U.S. foreign policy endeavors that, by the tone of his voice and manner of his expression, he viewed as more or less deplorable. This included, as has been demonstrated in the endless loop of clips from his sermon, bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki and nuking "far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye."

"Violence begets violence," Wright said, "hatred begets hatred, and terrorism begets terrorism."

And then he concluded by putting the comments on Peck's shoulders: "A white ambassador said that yall, not a black militant, not a reverend who preaches about racism, an ambassador whose eyes are wide open and is trying to get us to wake up and move away from this dangerous precipice... the ambassador said that the people we have wounded don't have the military capability we have, but they do have individuals who are willing to die and take thousands with them... let me stop my faith footnote right there."

Watch the video (the relevant material starts around the 3:00 mark):

So it seems that while Wright did believe American held some responsibility for 9/11, his views, which have been described as radically outside the political mainstream, were actually influenced by a career foreign policy official.

Who is Peck? The ambassador, who has offered controversial criticism of Israeli policy in the West Bank but also warned against the Iraq War, was lecturing on a cruise ship and was unavailable for comment. But officials at Peck's former organization, the Council for the National Interest, a non-profit group that advocates reducing Israel's influence on U.S. Middle East policy, offered descriptions of the man.

"Peck is very outspoken," said Eugene Bird, who now heads CNI. "He is also very good at making phrases that have a resonance with the American people. When he came off of that Fox News, a few days later he said they would never invite me back again."

And what, exactly, did Peck say in that Fox News interview that inspired Wright's words?

Here are some quotes from an appearance the Ambassador made on the network on October 11, 2001, which may or may not have been the segment Wright was referring to. On the show, Peck said he thought it was illogical to tie Saddam Hussein to the terrorist attacks on 9/11, and that while the then-Iraqi leader had "some very sound and logical reasons not to like [the United States]," he and Osama bin Laden had no other ties.

From there, Peck went on to ascribe motives for what prompted the 9/11 attacks. "Stopping the economic embargo and bombings of Iraq," he said, "things to which Osama bin Laden has alluded as the kinds of things he doesn't like. He doesn't think it's appropriate for the United States to be doing, from his perspective, all the terrible things that he sees us as having been doing, the same way Saddam Hussein feels. So from that perspective, they have a commonality of interests. But they also have a deeply divergent view of the role of Islam in government, which would be a problem."

Digg!

Tagged as: wright. 9/11, peck

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
your preachin aint like mah preachin!
Posted by: sleepingdog on Mar 22, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its nice when you put things in context. taking it out of it is a used up media trick. The pastor is human after all, he cares about people and has his own reasonably logical political views. the radicals are to be found elsewhere, in a pool of tired lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Rev Moved Me
Posted by: TokyoTuds on Mar 22, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched this just after the video of Faux News parsing Obama's "race speech". Both cases remind me of the need for context, and to read the whole article or book, hear the whole speech, see the whole picture.

Reverend Wright made me reflect, and Obama did too. I will deeply discount anyone's opinion who didn't hear both this sermon and Obama's speech beginning to end. Where can I hear the final 2 points that Reverend Wright alluded to, but that were cut off of this video.

Cheers,
Tuds

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Rev Moved Me Posted by: niliadis
» RE: The Rev Moved Me Posted by: TokyoTuds
» GEESH! Niliadis you are ANNOYING! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: The Final 2 Points Posted by: cflady
I was never offended by Wright...
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Mar 22, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as he was, of course, right. The CIA even agrees with him, they call it blowback. He said nothing contraversial in his speech, what was offensive was Obama's dumping him like a hot potato.

The man who married him, the man who he took great following from (ya know the rev talked about and endorsed Obama alot), hell he even used his words to sell his book.

It was disgusting to watch Obama do his song and dance to distance himself from what i think most people thought he was talking about when he referred to the change: a new consciousness that america has a corrupt foriegn policy that has caused pain and hardship around the world in the name of corporate greed. that the US military has acted like a private mercenary force for these corporations, and that america has sold out its own peoples medical health coverage for this...

But I guess that was all bullshit. The song and dance went something like this: I love corporate americas direction, i love our foereign policy, i love isreal's apartied war against the palestinians, and i reserve the right to use blackwater mercenaries to continue another generation of black ops and espionage much like my beloved reagan ran.
God bless America, god damn the 'terrorists' and their children, and yes i sang a different tune on my way up Mr. Wright, but the times they are a changin, so you gotta go, cause what you say was good for me to gain a base needed to climb, but yer old hat now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I was never offended by Wright... Posted by: andrewstromotich
patriot
Posted by: jrmart on Mar 22, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SIMPLE FACT:
THE TRUTH CAN HURT!
i am a white senior citizen. a veteran of the Viet Anti-war movement.
It is true that Americans have for hundreds of years oppressed and demonized other races, other people.
In the name of "Manifest Destiny", we practiced genocide on the Native Inhabitants of this great land.
Radical Muslims, just like Radical Christians are generally vile creatures, immune to logic and devoid of compassion.
That is no reason to emulate them.
Abu Graib, Guantonamo, Rendition, water boarding, spying and now apparantly snooping into a candidates travel history. Are these things of which to be proud?
I don't think God (whichever one you happen to believe in) should Damn America. I think he/she should guide America in the avowed purpose of our forefathers; Equality, Dignity and the rights of all.
Reverand Wright was just damned angry. Has he no reason to be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bah
Posted by: drsivana99 on Mar 22, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, the biggest irony here is that Wright was...right. We were not attacked on 9/11 because "they hate the fact that we love freedom." They hate the fact that we love what we see as our freedom to do whatever the hell we want to the rest of the world, without any consequences. Just to underscore this point, we have put that policy into overdrive ever since 9/11. But then, freedom means never having to say you're sorry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanx
Posted by: johnclark on Mar 22, 2008 1:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched these yesterday & was blown away. Context matters. I wonder if the MSM will retract? So, Rev Wright got in trouble for quoting former ambassador. In all the endless loops, this was never mentioned.

Good Morning America "said" it watched the tapes, but I saw the swift-boater videos w/ the exact quotes came out a day before their piece. Too bad ABC doesn't have a "public editor", ha?

As for Fox ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Again I say this is not about racism its about hatred toward America
Posted by: niliadis on Mar 22, 2008 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Obama was white or brown, pick or purple we would feel the same..we have come a long way and now Obama has brought our country back 50 years. We had moved towards equality and
had we not proved this starting with the Iowa win? Richardson either was offered the VP
Candidacy or got blind sighted by Obama’s efforts to divert the issue of hate into racism.
As a Latino American I truly hope it’s the latter, for we cannot let Obama blind sight us and bully us into the Racial Bandwagon. This is not about race it is about Obama misjudgment of being a member of a church for TWENTY YEARS in which his friend, uncle, spiritual advisor and mentor is an American Hater, an Anti-America that has
Represented his own racism, not ours. Please do not let Obama blind sight you! I as an American Latino love my country and therefore if I was in a church and heard these monstrosities, it would be the clue to immediately get out of there. Obama stayed and supported this Anti-American racist for TWENTY YEARS! Unforgivable! Sad day!
That Richardson that represents the Latinos has throw us all under the bus for a favor or maybe he is naïve to the fact that it is not about racism its about Anti-American Hate!
Unforgivable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People People
Posted by: niliadis on Mar 22, 2008 2:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at all we are saying! Look at how we are feeling... I say Obama will bring us much diviseness and much much much dispair!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: People People Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
» RE: People People Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: People People Posted by: cflady
Huffungton Post
Posted by: niliadis on Mar 22, 2008 3:10 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That explains all this BS!

Hatred is Hatred!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hatred is Hatred!?! Posted by: djnoll
fyi
Posted by: phyxius on Mar 22, 2008 4:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"the relevant material starts around the 3:00 mark"

That is not helpful when there's no timer...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: fyi Posted by: djnoll
» RE: fyi Posted by: TokyoTuds
Why hate?
Posted by: cflady on Mar 23, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amazing how some people use the term "hatred." Actually, I do believe it might be to justify their own hatred.

When I listened to the video on this site, I felt Rev. Wright was preaching love.

In other video clips shown on TV, where you hear "G.D. America," I don't believe the Rev. was saying he thought God should damn America. He followed up with "That's in the Bible," which makes me believe he is saying that God (not he) has already damned America! This is not hatred but simply an interpretation of the scriptures. I do believe it is the same scripture interpreted in a different way by John Hagee, who says the Catholic church is the great whore. I have met many people who believe this scripture about the "great whore that sitteth upon many waters" is referring to America and symbolized by the Statue of Liberty, and I have probably heard just as many say they believe it is the Catholic church.

Some media persons have stressed their upset with the statement about the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. Rev. Wright is not the first person to express this view. Many people who grew up in the era of the Tuskegee Experiment may hold this view. Also, we hear stories even today of bad medicines knowlingly distributed to African nations by greedy pharmaceutical companies.

Why is it acceptable for John Hagee to call the Catholic church the great whore? Why is Hagee called a man of God by evangelicals and just some religious nut by athiests and agnostics? Why is John Hagee not a hater?

Why does entertaining the possibility of a HIV conspiracy make Rev. Wright a hater and not just some conspiracy theorist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leonsmom
Posted by: leonsmom on Mar 23, 2008 1:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a white grandmother with no prior knowledge of this minister, but after watching this video I have admiration for him and what he was trying to convey.

My complaint is that religion has ANY part to play in the selection of a President of the U.S.A.! I think it shouldn't even be allowed to be considered - or mentioned! How about talking about the issues, you fools!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Love your country,
Posted by: Oryoki on Mar 23, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One mistake many of us make is to confuse our country with our government: there is a great distinction between the land and those who have political control over it.

I find no paradox in the statement, I love my country, and I despise the government that defiles it.

The Reverend's sermon did not show disrespect for our country. E.O.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America is what? Lines on a map?
Posted by: pangolin on Mar 23, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get onto Google Earth and look down, scroll back and forth and tell me what is "America" and what isn't. You have to get down to some pretty fine detail to find the border on the Mexican side and on the Canadian side it doesn't exist outside of cities.

America is a government that was supposed to adhere to a Constitution. We know that isn't any kind of operational process anymore. America is the land of torture, the advocate of torture.

America is a vast prison that keeps a million people locked up for private profit.

America is a genocidal monster that ate the native children of its land.

America is a father that leaves his children dying in the streets while he parties in the world's bordello's.

America is the priest that preaches against sin and preys on little boys.

America is the thug that holds the palestinian people while Israel beats them.

America is the psychopath that drops poison in the worlds wells so that it can sell it's quack medicines of "democracy" and "capitalism."

America is millions of people without adequate or reasonable healthcare while its doctors are locked in the embrace of the pharmaceutical companies paid whores.

America is the winged angels of death that drop fire from the sky on children and then declare the dead infants "terrorists."

America is the evil that sends it's children to kill the children of other lands and then pushes the broken souls that result into the street to die under the open sky.

America is not the land, it is not the people but it is a vast source of pollution, death, hatred and evil in this world for the land is not evil and the people are both good and evil in the same measure as people everywhere but a government under a striped flag that collects evil and gives it the highest seats and the exclusive right to speak on the monster of mass media.

I used to believe in a good and benevolent America just like a little boy with an alcoholic father believes his daddy will dry up and make things right. I'm not so stupid anymore. Obviously other people are.

Rev. Wright understated the problem, he was a generous man who saw hope of redemption where I see mostly evil and the worship of the golden calf. Where I see shit he is good enough to see compost and roses in the future. For this he was attacked by the American corporate media. What does that say about you people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ignorant white americans cannot understand the righteous anger of Wright
Posted by: PakiBoy on Mar 23, 2008 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I have statistics to back me from WashPost:

"Social psychologists Philip Mazzocco and Mahzarin Banaji once asked white volunteers how much money would cover the "costs" of being born black instead of white. The volunteers guessed that about $5,000 ought to cover the lifetime disadvantages of being an average black person rather than an average white person, in the United States. By contrast, when asked how much they wanted to go without television, the volunteers demanded a million dollars.
Mazzocco and Banaji were taken aback. The average black person in America is 447 percent more likely to be imprisoned than the average white person, and 521 percent more likely to be murdered. Blacks earn 60 cents to the dollar compared with whites who have the same education levels and marital status. The black poverty rate is nearly twice the white poverty rate. Blacks tend to die five years earlier than whites; the infant mortality rate among black babies is nearly 1 1/2 times the rate among white babies. And because of long-standing patterns of inheritance, blacks and whites begin life with substantial disparities in family wealth.

"The point we were making is, whatever the cost of being black might be, whites are vastly underestimating it," said Mazzocco, of Ohio State University at Mansfield. "You throw in the 5-to-1 wealth gap . . . if you wanted to put a dollar-and-cents value on the difference, you would come up with a number much larger than $5,000."


Given this is the level of racism and ignorance of white americans about a minority they have exploited for hundreds of years, one can only imagine the level of ignorance towards "moslems" and others!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pfft! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: pfft! Posted by: cflady
» what ignorance? Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» My America Posted by: cflady
» as though you were the only one Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Find the text here:
Posted by: herbal on Mar 24, 2008 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/3/21/122016/428

Its a great sermon! He speaks true Christian responsibility. Brother's keeper, Love your enemy, Do no harm to any man. A minister is supposed to make you feel a little like being a better person, no? Some times its a bit discomfiting, but I pass as white and don't think Wright is racist at all.

The thing that bothers me about Obama is his expression of willingness to invade Syria and Pakistan! He needs to repudiate that and not Wright.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wright is right...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Mar 25, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in almost every statement he made. To me he should be the new MLK, (which we need badly).

The only thing I disagree with him on is his belief in Invisible Friends. That is where credibility fails, but if he can use his Invisible Friend to do some good for a change then I am willing to go along.

I defy anyone to tell me just what point he made is wrong. Oh, I know the one about reading into his statements about the "911 chickens...etc". However, even this may be only wrong in that it was probably an inside job in the first place. For your viewing pleasure see:

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Dieter
Posted by: popmomdieter on Mar 25, 2008 10:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To fully understand the statements regarding 9/11 which reflect the theory of "chickens coming home to roost" one must read the book, "Overthrow" by Stephen Kinzer. According to him, every US conflict, excepting WW 11; almost every invasion/covert action/regime change against other countries, starting with the take-over of Hawaii in 1893, was done to gain control over those countries' resources. Other than the Korean , Viet Nam, and Contra conflicts, which were presumably undertaken to contain Communism, governments in Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Phillipines, Nicaragua, Chile, Guatemala and Honduras were deposed in order to make some rich Americans richer. Our incursions into the Middle East have stirred up hatreds that will likely be remembered for generations. We need to redefine our place in the world or we will be as hated as the Nazis. We need a president who can do this. It will not be easy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]