Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McCain Courts Secret Radical Religious Conservative Group

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 5:50 AM on March 8, 2008.


The Council for National Policy would be perfectly happy if the public didn’t even know it exists.
poormccain

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Election 2008

Sarah Palin's Reckless Approach to Health Care
Julia Eisman Stand Up for Health Care

Election Observer Arrested in Arizona
Steven Rosenfeld AlterNet

Will Sarah Palin Have An Effect on the Women's Vote?
Heather Gehlert AlterNet

Usually, political groups trip over one another to try and gain public notoriety and attention. The Council for National Policy, meanwhile, would be perfectly happy if the public didn’t even know it exists. (I’ve long believed the easiest job on Earth would be to serve as this group’s press secretary.)

The CNP is made up of many heavy-hitters from the religious right and conservative movement in general, and they meet periodically to plot and scheme. It may sound excessively cloak-and-dagger of the group, but the CNP has a list of formal rules, one of which reads, "The media should not know when or where we meet or who takes part in our programs, before or after a meeting.”

Fortunately, details routinely leak. Today in New Orleans, for example, the CNP will gather and hear from none other than John McCain. (You know, the one who “refuses to pander” to anyone.)

Sen. John McCain, in his post-victory debut before the conservative movement’s top donors and leaders, will address the Council for National Policy’s annual winter meeting here today.

His remarks at the event, which has always been closed to the public and will have only a partial accommodation of the press this year for the first time, could turn out to be his make-or-break pitch for support from some of the right’s most influential critics of his past positions and policies.

“This is the most distinguished collection of conservative leaders and donors, and he was anxious to appear as part of his ongoing effort to consolidate support for his candidacy within the conservative movement,” said Charlie Black, Mr. McCain’s campaign adviser.

Not everyone will be glad to see him. One veteran CNP member told the far-right Washington Times, “It will say more about the state of the conservative movement than it does McCain. If he is accepted at CNP, this will mark the official end of the conservative movement as we knew it.”

And who, exactly, is the Council for National Policy? I’m glad you asked.

U.S. News reported during the ‘04 campaign:

The supersecret Council for National Policy, founded at the onset of the Reagan era, will be meeting in New York at an undisclosed location in hopes of avoiding protesters. The thousand member group includes political heavyweights like John Ashcroft, Bill Frist, and Tom DeLay, religious leaders from Pat Robertson to James Dobson, media moguls like Steve Forbes, and conservative billionaires Howard Ahmanson and Nelson Bunker Hunt.

Conservative Republicans boast that the council’s meeting is the “real” convention. “It’s the old smoke-filled room, but I wouldn’t say it’s corrupt,” says a source. “Rather it’s just where the work gets done.”

No one really knows what kind of work gets done when these wealthy, powerful right-wingers gather in their proverbial smoke-filled room. We do know that the CNP was co-founded by Tim LaHaye, who provides the Biblical analysis for the popular, right-wing “Left Behind” novels and who has worked to advance the religious right’s agenda for decades.

We also know that the CNP’s membership reads like a who’s who of some powerful far-right players. In addition to those mentioned in the U.S. News piece, readers may recognize names such as Grover Norquist, Phyllis Schlafly, and Oliver North.

Perhaps the best mainstream report on the CNP came from ABC News a couple of years ago, which described the Council as “the most powerful conservative group you’ve never heard of.”

When Steve Baldwin, the executive director of an organization with the stale-as-old-bread name of the Council for National Policy, boasts that “we control everything in the world,” he is only half-kidding.

Half-kidding, because the council doesn’t really control the world. The staff of about eight, working in a modern office building in Fairfax, Va., isn’t even enough for a real full-court basketball game.

But also half-serious because the council has deservedly attained the reputation for conceiving and promoting the ideas of many who in fact do want to control everything in the world.

As for McCain, the Washington Times added, “‘We agreed the press could sit in a separate room and listen to the speech and the questions and answers,’ a CNP official said, speaking anonymously because the rules of the council forbid officials or members to speak by name in public.”

It should be interesting. Right Wing Watch also has a good item on the CNP.

Digg!

Tagged as: council for national poli, religious right, mccain

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Sarah Palin's Reckless Approach to Health Care
Just like John McCain, Palin is putting private market interests before consumers.
Post by Julia Eisman. September 7, 2008.
Election Observer Arrested in Arizona
Will cops crack down on election observers in November?
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. September 7, 2008.
Will Sarah Palin Have An Effect on the Women's Vote?
A recent survey shows mixed results.
Post by Heather Gehlert. September 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's been said....
Posted by: reval on Mar 8, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that American's have the government they deserve. But have we really sunken that far down the evolutionary ladder? This event is positively frightening, maybe even more frightening than Hagee's CUFI "conventions."

~Rev El
Pastor, WVCSR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not corrupt?
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Mar 8, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“It’s the old smoke-filled room, but I wouldn’t say it’s corrupt,” says a source. “Rather it’s just where the work gets done.”

If a rich and powerful group is trying to sway elections SECRETLY from the people doing the electing, it's CORRUPTION by definition!

Same old high-minded, hypocritical, fundamentalist bull.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Holy Hypocrites...
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Mar 8, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Delay oh yeah they're real religious..what a fucking joke.."Hot Tub" criminal lying Tom Delay...Maybe they should rename the group The Holy Hypocrites..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mdsnurse5
Posted by: mdsnurse5 on Mar 8, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lord knows nobody dislikes/distrusts John McCain more than me, but I would hardly describe this as losing his cool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mdsnurse5 Posted by: mdsnurse5
Who are the Real Monsters?
Posted by: thehousedog on Mar 8, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, Bush vetoed the bill that would ban waterboarding. This continues to demonstrate to citizens who pay attention, as well as the rest of the world, that we live under a corrupt, facist regime that approves of torture and will continue to torture people, whomever and whereeve they be.

Hillary approved this war on terror and nearly every aspect of what Bush has done in the past six plus years. Calling her a monster is the least offensive thing I have heard in a long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain ability to maintain his alliance with the insane....
Posted by: reval on Mar 8, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..... is clearly understandable when you consider his supporters (and many others engaged in the current politic).

Meet the McCainiacks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The CNP meeting...........
Posted by: tap17x on Mar 8, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
............would be a great place for a bomb to go off. Of course I would never do such an evil, nasty, unfair thing but some crazed left-wing fanatic might. (Please.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most of us understand that religion is caused by insanity
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 8, 2008 3:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Religion is caused by any one or more of about half a dozen mental illnesses.
The truth about religion can be found in these books:

"The Neuropsychological bases of god beliefs" Dr. Michael A. Persinger MD,
psychiatrist 1987 "Religious people are just like my temporal lobe patients"

"The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bi-Cameral Mind" Julian
Jaynes Professor, Harvard University 1976 "Religious people are just like
schizophrenic patients"

"The Psychiatric Interview in Clinical Practice" Roger A. MacKinnon, M.D.,
Robert Michels, M.D. W. B. Saunders Co. 1971 "Religiosity is a common
symptom [of] schizophrenic patients"

"The God delusion" by Richard Dawkins. "Religion is caused by a kind of
computer virus that infects the living computer, the human brain."

"The Science of Good and Evil" by Michael Shermer, 2004 "Morality and Ethics
are now in the jurisdiction of Science and greatly improved thereby."

Many books in the new science called "Sociobiology": Morals and ethics are
instinctive and they evolved.

"God: The Failed Hypothesis" by Victor Stenger Scientific proof that god does
not exist.

"The God Part of the Brain" by Matthew Alper 1996. "The USA is anomolusly
religious because many early founder groups were religiously insane and fleeing
prosecution in Europe. Religion is a genetic disorder."

"The Accidental Mind" by David J. Linden, 2007 Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press. Religion is caused by the extreme klugeyness of the "designed"
by evolution brain. In particular, the narrative creation system cannot be turned
off. It generates false narratives that are believed by the generating person. This is
seen in experiments done in the laboratory. This book has the best explanation of
resistance to evolution: "There has also been an assumption that if one accepts the
idea that life developed without divine intervention, it necessarily follows that all
aspects of religious thought must be rejected. Those who take this line of
argument to extremes argue that when religious thought is rejected moral and
social codes will degenerate and "the law of the jungle" will be all that is left. It is
imagined by religious fundamentalists that those who do not share their particular
religious faith are incapable of leading moral lives." These suppositions are not
true many times over. Linden later mentions that the creationists [intelligent
design advocates] are exactly 180 degrees wrong rather than just a little wrong.
Being exactly wrong, they are unable to unlearn their error. See Sociobiology or
Sciobio.

"Scientists Confront Intelligent Design and Creationism" edited by Petto &
Godfrey, 2007. The ID and creationist crowd are trying to do away with science.
They see science as a "godless religion." Science is a process, not a religion.

"Manufacturing Belief" by Lewis Wolpert
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/05/15/lewis_wolpert/

"The End of Faith" and "Letter to a Christian Nation" by Sam Harris

"Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon", by Daniel Dennett
Let's do scientific research on religion and find out what causes it.

"Origins of the Modern Mind" by Merlin Donald 1991 "So what did you expect
from a brain that is based on the Chimpanzee brain?

"Atheism, A Case Against God" by George Smith

"God is not Great; how religion poisons everything" by Christopher Hitchens, 2007

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush on the Couch
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 8, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President" written by
Dr. Justin A. Frank, a psychoanalyst who has a lot to say about
what is emotionally wrong with George W. Bush, his professional
ideas on what happened to him to make him crazy. George W.
Bush also has dislexia and ADHD which make him mentally
disabled for the job of president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All religions are dangerous
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Mar 8, 2008 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALL religions are dangerous, not just the extreme ones. See: "The End of Faith"
by Sam Harris. Sam Harris is correct in saying that it isn't just radical religion that
is dangerous, it is all religion that is dangerous. Any belief in any religion causes
or enables war, horror and terror. Religion is obsolete and we should say so.
Religion could easily lead to the fall of civilization or the extinction of Homo
Sapiens. I recommend Sam's book.

Let's hope that religions, all of them, are on their last legs. What do you do
when you are describing the extinction of Homo Sapiens due to global warming
or asteroid impact and some insane person says: "God wouldn't let that happen"?
Somebody suggested saying: "Noah, how long can you tread water?" Flaw one
in that argument is that, in the legend, Noah survives. Flaw two is that we have
to do the entire thing ourselves. There is no god to warn us or tell us how to
survive. [It was really the ice age, not a flood, it was a cave, not a boat, and the
animals entered the cave because people were unable to keep them out. How
else would primitive people who had never seen ice describe an ice age?]

If religion is ended and replaced by science, democracies will have a much better
chance of reaching reasonable decisions on subjects like global warming. Note
that science is NOT a religion. Science is a method or a procedure or a process,
not a fixed set of beliefs. Student scientists repeat the major experiments of their
science and prove to themselves that the professor is right, no matter how much
they don't want to believe the professor.

If religion is not ended, we are much more likely to go extinct soon because
religion eliminates or limits the possibility of rational thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]