Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Uses Signing Statement to Legalize Warrantless Searches of US Citizens' Mail

Posted by Jesse Wendel, Group News Blog at 10:13 AM on March 6, 2008.


I feel safer already.
bushsignlarge
Bush

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

On December 20, 2007, President Bush signed routine postal legislation. In a "Signing Statement", the President claims Executive Power to search the mail of U.S. citizens inside the United States without a warrant, in direct contradiction of the bill he had just signed.

The Seattle Times
The move, one year after The New York Times' disclosure of a secret program that allowed warrantless monitoring of Americans' phone calls and e-mail, caught Capitol Hill by surprise.
"Despite the president's statement that he may be able to circumvent a basic privacy protection, the new postal law continues to prohibit the government from snooping into people's mail without a warrant," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the incoming House Government Reform Committee chairman, who co-sponsored the bill.
"You have to be concerned," a senior U.S. official agreed. "It takes executive-branch authority beyond anything we've ever known."
Yet, in his statement, Bush said he will "construe" an exception, "which provides for opening of an item of a class of mail otherwise sealed against inspection in a manner consistent ... with the need to conduct searches in exigent circumstances."
White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore denied Bush was claiming new authority.
"In certain circumstances -- such as with the proverbial 'ticking bomb' -- the Constitution does not require warrants for reasonable searches," she said.
Bush, however, cited "exigent circumstances" that could refer to an imminent danger or a long-standing state of emergency.
I feel safer already.

If you were wondering what Keith Olbermann was going to talk about tonight, we've got you covered... This.

The only real question is, will Keith have video of The President actually wiping his ass with The Constitution, or are those films Top-Secret Presidential -- like the list of people Dick Cheney has shotgunned, then made to apologize?

Reading our mail? Letters from soldiers to their boyfriends and girlfriends. Strategy memos from Fortune 500 Companies to strategic partners including how they'll bid on government jobs. Whistle-blower memos. Letters to criminal defense lawyers, priests and rabbis.

If the U.S. Mail isn't private, next thing you know the Feds will be listening to our damn phone calls! Reading our emails! Restricting our ability to travel or arresting us for trying to get into a political event if we're not assimilated.

Worst. President. Ever.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, domestic spying, mail

Jesse Wendel is the Publisher and creator of Group News Blog. A writer/director, he is producing "What's Your Pattern?", a documentary asking "why do people date the same types over and over again?"


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republican Tactics
Posted by: ruscle on Mar 6, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republican tactics of Hillary are only going to work out in favor of Republicans in the long run. Hillary shows TOTAL LACK OF JUDGEMENT. So much for her "experience." John McCain has experience too. A lot... years and years and decades. Yet he is out of touch with reality, the American people and humanity. Experience doesn't mean squat if the person doesn't learn and grow from it. Clinton makes that all the more clear. Besides her recent obtuse comments trumpeting McCains experience (stupid), you have to wonder about her naiveté in falling for the Canadian Neo-con lie -- that was a ploy by the neo-cons in Canada to help Republicans in the US -- she looks foolish. I'm sorry she is still in the race. She's only making a bigger ass out of herself as each state passes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ah, again...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 6, 2008 11:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore denied Bush was claiming new authority.

"In certain circumstances -- such as with the proverbial 'ticking bomb' -- the Constitution does not require warrants for reasonable searches," she said."

Yet again Bush tries to usurp the authority of the judicial branch and decide what is and is not permissable under the constitution.

And the smug fuck wants "constructionist" judges. Ok... where in the constitution does it say that some circumstances do not require warrants for otherwise illegal searches??? Oh, wait.. IT DOESN'T.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ah, again... Posted by: papa.redden
IMPEACH THIS FUCKER NOW
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Mar 6, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
!

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Execute him!
Posted by: ikonoklast on Mar 6, 2008 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and others in his administration have committed such offenses against the Constitution and the people of the United States that justice requires a thorough investigation into their crimes. If Bush et al. are proven guilty, the law demands that he and others in his administration be sentenced and executed for treason.

America cries out for his impeachment, but we must have the courage and strength not only to try him for his crimes but to punish them to the fullest extent of the law. Let the Tree of Liberty be watered with this tyrant's blood.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Execute him! Posted by: buddyedgewood
» RE: Execute him! Posted by: badkitty
» RE: xecute him! Posted by: Marc02
» RE: xecute him! Posted by: jvaljon1
This should be no surprise to anyone!
Posted by: buddyedgewood on Mar 6, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush may not use it, but he's setting up his successor (Hillary, McCain or Obama) with all the power they need to oppress us and bring George Orwell’s 1984 fantasy into reality, little by little...

Wake up America! You're asleep at the wheel and heading for the ravine of totalitarianism!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Going Postal
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 6, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has got us where he wants us. Even the Luddites who don't care about Americans' emails being read because they don't use email anyway, and maybe who don't even use the phone, might care if their mail is being read -- since mail used to be the one safe-haven from our lunatic president's spying eyes. (Does anyone communicate via postal mail anymore anyway?)

Even if you don't communicate via letters you should be concerned about this because the president wants to view what packages you are getting. (So much for ordering sexy underwear through the mail.)

And if there ever is a "ticking-bomb" scenario in regards to the mail, no one is saying the authorities couldn't get a warrant before now.

How much you want to bet this new authority claimed by Bush is abused to a great extent and abused widely?

As with all spying authority claimed by Bush and given to him by the Congress, there WILL be a great number of abuses. We may not hear about these abuses because they are classified. But there will be abuses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Going Postal Posted by: aerdrie
» RE: Going Postal Posted by: donl51
Exigent circumstances...
Posted by: lexicon on Mar 6, 2008 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see....with Postal mail, a "suspect" parcel or letter will, for the most part, be within the absolute control of the USPS for AT LEAST 24 hours.


I'm really just guessing here, but I think it's entirely possible that getting a warrant from FISA would take, maybe worst-case...2 hours, ANY time of day. Probably as much as 10 minutes, best case.

Somehow, I cannot even imagine an "Exigent" circumstance that would preclude obtaining a prior warrant.

Maybe it IS a proverbial ticking time bomb? Well...stick it, unopened, inside whatever you stick a bomb that you need to explode harmlessly or defuse...and take the 10 minutes to get the warrant.

In other words, there IS NO PURPOSE to this other than political.

By the way...when did the press start discussing these signing statements as if they were relevant to the law? Clearly they're not.

Signing statements are a way to clarify the actual implementation of a law, not a line-item-veto.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FORCE THE NEXT PRESIDENT TO "TAKE THE PLEDGE"...
Posted by: lexicon on Mar 6, 2008 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's start a campaign: Everywhere any presidential candidate goes, he/she MUST be HOUNDED by calls for him/her to PLEDGE:

"..that I, as the next POTUS, do solemnly PLEDGE that within 24 hours of taking the oath of office, I shall sign an Executive Order, Effecting the immediate nullification of, and vacating of, any and all Presidential Signing Statements issued by the 43rd President of these United States."

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Letters from soldiers to their boyfriends and girlfriends?
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Mar 6, 2008 8:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
these letters are already subject to search under military laws...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crybabies and Hillary
Posted by: mkdelta69 on Mar 7, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's pathetic that the same girlymen crying about Hillaries tactics have been ditto heading the same crying of the NeoConJobs and the Clintons since the 1990's.

Your NeoConJob lite.

Obama has had an easy ride up till now. If your crying about Clinton, you'll be spastic bout McSame, if Obama is nominee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton/McCain have the same team
Posted by: Sushi on Mar 7, 2008 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google: WPP and Clinton and read the Washington Post article on who is advising these two. Just a little too close for comfort for me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Postal deliveries have been "searched" for years
Posted by: grethart on Mar 7, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a resident of a small western mountain town, I do the majority of my shopping on the internet or ordering by phone.

Quite often my merchandise arrives in packages that have obviously been opened and then re-
taped/repacked prior to delivery to me, or not resealed at all. Some letter correspondence received has also been opened prior to receiving it....sometimes, not even resealed with tape...it arrives opened.

When I received my regular order of Gevalia coffee which arrived in an open box and had obviously been tampered with somewhere along the line, my patience ran out.

I personally went to the postoffice and asked why someone would go through sealed envelopes, boxes of ordered merchandise, and a coffee order sent in the mail.

I was informed that it has been the custom of "whomever" in the postal service for many years 'for safety reasons' to open and check mail.

It was not indicated at which point in the mailing process along the items' journeys to recipients that these items were 'inspected' on an 'arbitrary' basis for 'safety' reasons.

I was assured it was never done at my local post office in this small town....and it was also noted that spot checks of mail were made also for 'drug' reasons.

Why on earth inspectors open sealed mail and packages of an old woman living in small town in the mountains is beyond me.
It appears my merchandise and coffee orders present some sort of national threat.

BE AWARE THAT OUR MAIL HAS BEEN OPENED AND SEARCHED FOR YEARS.

THIS NEW LEGISLATION IS ANOTHER BUSH TACTIC TO COVER HIS TRACKS!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm about to go "postal"...
Posted by: VickyinSD on Mar 7, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
over the insanity of this fucked-up administration and their total abuse of our Constitutional rights!!!

And where the hell is Congress? Why aren't our representatives protecting our rights?

I DON'T GET IT!!! Is everyone in DC on drugs or what? None of it makes any sense, and I'm on the verge of taking matters into my own hands if this shit continues! I'm burnt out on all the bullshit!!!

We need to IMPEACH THESE IDIOTS NOW... BEFORE they leave office with their taxpayer funded govt. pensions!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fuckin bush
Posted by: SASSYLYNN87 on Mar 7, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a douchebag. impeach him, stab the shit out of him till hes almost dead then burn his ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: fuckin bush Posted by: jvaljon1
American for liberty, truth, and justice
Posted by: Michael_D on Mar 7, 2008 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please wake up people! Obama is a cousin of Cheney and Bush and is a CFR mouthpiece just like the other. Probably caught up in the crossfire of power/corruption like so many! He says only "change" allot thus proving his inexperience or will to tackle our REAL problems!!!! He is no different at ALL than the others.

The Clinton's ? watch this and WAKE UP TO THE TRUE POWER OF MEDIA MANIPULATION!

The revolution is on. Wake up to what we all have let the media do to America. They have now consolidated into only 5 corporations for everything on AMERICAN TV!!!! Half the commentators on TV are even fooled!!!

oh yea, realize this fact too pretty damn quick:

Coke Bush

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DOWN WITH CORPORATE MEDIA - UP WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
Posted by: Michael_D on Mar 7, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to see some REAL patriots look here
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero
REAL American Hero

and watch this TRUTH too
REAL American Hero

They do this by contolling information and by GREATLY influencing our elections with the BUSH-CHENEY connected DIEBOLD MACHINES (now PRIMIER) and all kinds of other strong arm tactics around the nation whereby they influence or STEAL the elections!.

Wake up if you love American freedom and hate needless war for profit and/or overthrowing of governments and confusion of the masses by corrupt CIA and all the neocons!

This is what the media/government has done to us for too long. The internet and people rising up with the TRUTH after all these years of media lies is the only thin that can help America now. There is no left or right in America at this moment. Only corruptness and media lies so big that most can't see though it.

McCain is one of the WORST puppets out there!!! His top four contributors, (like most candidates, are... BANKS!

R E S E A R C H

Ron Paul’s military contributions are greater than those of all other current candidates – John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama –combined.

The “Top Contributors” figures can be found at www.opensecrets.org.

JOIN the rEVOLution people. IT IS DUTY.

When big media blocks Ron Paul out, it blocks YOU (and all your kids and family) out.

Why do you think they spew so much about "terrorists"?

Starting to get the picture now?

No more lies. They must go. The time is now.

STAND UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Join the revolution. Take back America. Shun the non-believers.

TaxDay08

and sure don't miss the rally on DC on June 21st.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And You Thought the Movie "Eraserhead" Was Weird
Posted by: blackie4aces on Mar 7, 2008 5:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore denied Bush was claiming new authority.

"In certain circumstances -- such as with the proverbial 'ticking bomb' -- the Constitution does not require warrants for reasonable searches," she said.

Bush, however, cited "exigent circumstances" that could refer to an imminent danger or a long-standing state of emergency.


Will someone please show me where in the Constution there is any mention of a "ticking bomb," the single words "proverbial," "ticking," or "bomb," or the words "exigent circumstances."

Then can someone please tell me where the Administration finds these hopeless idiots like Emily Lawrimore.

Lastly, can anyone please tell me what has hapened to the American Public that it continues to tolerate this Kafkaesque farce. Are we, in fact, the hopeless idiots?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is worse...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Mar 8, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...where are the Democraps while this is happening? Oh yeah, they are bending over while the Shrub has his way with them.

THEY are JUST as responsible as the Shrub in allowing him to shred the constitution before their eyes.

Don't be surprised if another "911" happens just before the election and the Shrub dictates that he needs to suspend them in the interest of freedom and protecting you, therefore he stays in office for who knows how long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeach? I WISH!
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Mar 8, 2008 9:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only. But Lady Nancy made it quite clear to a stunned and disbelieving Democratic party that "impeachment is off the table."

But it doesn't take Nancy Pelosi alone to protect BushCo. There must be other Congress & Senate people--Democrats--protecting him. Joe Lieberman comes to mind as someone likely to vote against impeaching Bush. Here's my suggestion:

Find out how many times Bush and or Cheney's impeachment has been voted down--and then find out who cast those "nay" votes. LET THEM KNOW THAT--REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRATS--THEIR ASSES ARE OUT OF CAPITOL HILL, COME THIS NOV.

The MSM have been very careful not to mention impeachment, or votes, or anything even remotely along those lines.. Our own Speaker of the House might as well be Republican in her zeal to protect this Crook of Crooks. So we got to find out ourselves, who Bush's Democratic helpers are (beside Lady Nancy Pelosi)--exactly what tactics they're using to keep those votes from coming to the floor.

Then, kick ALL their asses out, come November!

Also--what does it take to reverse a Presidential signing statement? Seems there are quite a few of those, that belong in the garbage--right next to the Crook-In-Chief, who wrote them...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not to nitpic
Posted by: jongleur on Mar 9, 2008 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not to nitpic, but if you are looking to bolster your credibility, it really honestly and truly does help if you get your facts right. The bill was HR6407, and President Bush signed it on Dec 20, 2006. Not Dec 20, 2007 as you claimed. Citing sources tends to reduce those sorts of errors.

President Bush's signing statement is here

Other than that, it is typical of GW Bush, showing a complete disregard for Congress and more importantly, the document that he swore to defend, the Constitution of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Signing Statements..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Mar 13, 2008 12:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a signing statement stating henceforth there shall be no further signing statements, and that no signing statement may be signed that reverses the signing statement ending signing statements..!

Simple as that...!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]