Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Clinton Campaign Defends Using GOP Tactics in "3 am Ad"

Posted by Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake at 11:06 AM on March 6, 2008.


I will say, however, that the Clinton campaign has been much more open when it comes to letting people ask tough questions of them.
Hillary's 3 AM ad

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

On a conference call with Ann Lewis and Howard Wolfson of the Clinton campaign this morning, Lewis hit Obama hard for repeating Republican talking points and reinforcing the GOP frame in attacking Hillary Clinton on healthcare and other issues. So I got a chance to ask a question as to why they chose to run the "phone ad," which reinforces the the Republican "be afraid all the time" frame? And isn't John McCain ultimately the winner in that argument?

The response was unsatisfying -- Lewis said that using fear to divide us or suggest that there are threats that don't exist is wrong, but that she thought it was fair to say that every president in their tenure faces a security threat that is legitimate. She said that since Democrats had been taking it on the chin over national security for so long it was good to take the issue on up front, which might have made sense if it was a general election ad but since the implicit message was that Obama's not ready to do that, and thus that we are subject to threats he can't face, it does reinforce the "Democrats are soft" messaging.

Wolfson said that what they were trying to say was that Hillary Clinton is prepared using good judgment and all the tools at her disposal, which I took to mean not resorting to war first, but the ad doesn't say that. It says there are bogeymen in the night who will threaten your kids and you should be scared. It's a Republican message and the ultimate Republican frame that has been used to justify interminable war and to uncontrollable defense spending. It's what makes members of Congress terrified to end the war by defunding it. It's a destructive message at a time when people want out and are open to new ideas and new leadership.

I will say, however, that the Clinton campaign has been much more open when it comes to letting people ask tough questions of them. Something like what happened the other night -- when Obama general counsel Bob Bauer got on a Clinton conference call and hammered Wolfson -- could never happen in reverse. I've asked to be on the Obama calls and they've never allowed it, because I certainly would've liked to ask similar questions of them about the Harry & Louise ads, so points to Clinton for transparency.

They also said that Clinton had raised $3 million in 24 hours and that they were open to do-overs in Michigan and Florida.


AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: texas, clinton, obama, ohio, wolfson, negative campaigning

Jane Hamsher is the founder of FireDogLake. Her work has also appeared on the Huffington Post, Alternet and The American Prospect.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hmm )))
Posted by: Balans on Mar 6, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like some of Hillary Clinton's advisers may be avoiding the political writing on the wall. Thanks, Smiley

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republican Tactics
Posted by: ruscle on Mar 6, 2008 11:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republican tactics of Hillary are only going to work out in favor of Republicans in the long run. Hillary shows TOTAL LACK OF JUDGEMENT. So much for her "experience." John McCain has experience too. A lot... years and years and decades. Yet he is out of touch with reality, the American people and humanity. Experience doesn't mean squat if the person doesn't learn and grow from it. Clinton makes that all the more clear. Besides her recent obtuse comments trumpeting McCains experience (stupid), you have to wonder about her naiveté in falling for the Canadian Neo-con lie -- that was a ploy by the neo-cons in Canada to help Republicans in the US -- she looks foolish. I'm sorry she is still in the race. She's only making a bigger ass out of herself as each state passes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublican Tactics Posted by: desidid
Experience Scmexperience
Posted by: Sil on Mar 6, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not interested in someone with an experience of wrong answers that sitting on the board of Wal-Mart, sanctioning NAFTA, and voting for the Iraq war. If that's the kind of experience that comes into play for President of the United States, I'm glad Obama is "inexperienced". I've had so much of the Clintons' experience I could choke and Hillary will never get my nod.

Apparently Laura Bush has a plethora of experience that we should consider for President, and "experience" starts in your college years. There must be a lot of experienced people in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The videos Hillary does NOT want you to see!
Posted by: jhecht on Mar 6, 2008 4:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I&feature=related

part 2 - spread it wide & far!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

3 a.m. dreams...
Posted by: noir on Mar 6, 2008 4:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
March 4: it was a dark and stormy night. At 3 am the phone rang and I woke with a start, knowing I was Obama. The voice at the other end informed me that Muslim terrorists had invaded Amarillo and Youngstown, and asked me, the commander-in-chief, for instructions. Summoning all the inexperience I could muster when night is at its darkest—inexperience not being part of my daylight toolkit—I thought fast. Or rather slow, which gave the invaders time to make it to Lubbock and Dayton. Eventually I stammered "Ch-ch-change. Ch-ch-change is good."

Think I must have botched it. Word came back that the invaders were fast moving in on Del Rio and Canton. Things then got hazy for awhile. (3 am has never been my optimal kickass timeslot.) And somewhat later--although strangely it seemed to be 3 am for a second time--I was again awakened by a phone call. Same voice, same message, and same question…...but this time I was, thank God, Hillary! Instantly I was on the alert. Years of experience as the spouse of a President who never got such a call, and as a senator who also never did, rushed through my tingling nerve fibers, and I, I alone, knew what to do, and knew that I alone except also as well the American People knew that I knew it. I went all steely Presidential and in a steady voice tempered by years of votemongering experience I exclaimed "For Chrissake it’s 3 am, nuke the bastards.” Then I settled back into an untroubled repose at last, recumbent in the secure knowledge that the flag on the front porch was safe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Girls Gone Negative!
Posted by: wagadog on Mar 6, 2008 5:47 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hold the phone! All conversations guaranteed overheard.



So Hil goes all negative on Barack, right?

This "I have more experience [older]", she calling him "boy." And then she starts going on about the details of his buying his own house, like he didn't even have the right

mm-hmmm?

So then, he's like "If she wants to take the campaign debate into areas like Real Estate we can certainly go there ."

oh yeah.

And then, she's like all "Y'all are worse than Ken Starr!

who he?

well...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jokerman Posted by: wagadog
Ya Wanna Watch a Choir Sing...
Posted by: davescott on Mar 7, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go to church. The ad was a nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Clinton/Obama ticket?
Posted by: xvictor on Mar 7, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad she's still in the race. Bill Clinton might have made a gaffe in South Carolina but he quickly adjusted and is still a crowd pleaser, which obviously bode well for Hillary.

There are rumors that a Clinton/Obama ticket is in the offing. A bit early but a reasonable and very attractive scenario.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Clinton/Obama ticket? Posted by: Thebigkate
» RE: A Clinton/Obama ticket? Posted by: Prairie Waif
It is 3:00 a.m.
Posted by: ArthurTHimmelman on Mar 7, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is 3:00 a.m. The red phone rings in the White House. President Hillary Clinton answers. "POTUS," the caller says, "The Secret Service has found Bill with that woman again."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is 3:00 a.m. Posted by: Thebigkate
» RE: It is 3:00 a.m. Posted by: Prairie Waif
Fear Factor; The Telephone Rings in the White House?
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Mar 7, 2008 12:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Jane Hamsher . . .

It is interesting to read your inside view. Your discussion of transparency within the respective campaigns is contrary to all I have read and heard. May I share some quotes from the press.

Among the difficulties surrounding the Clinton campaign in recent weeks has been a deteriorating relationship with the news media. While never warm, these relations have become strained to the point of active warfare in some cases, and they are becoming a factor in the campaign.

National correspondents are increasingly frustrated by a lack of access to Clinton.

For the small band of reporters who regularly cover Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign, the dirty little secret is this: They rarely -- if ever -- get to speak to the candidate herself.

Clinton, D-N.Y., is running perhaps the most media-controlled -- and media-obsessed -- campaign in presidential history. Her aides carefully screen access to the candidate, generally avoid news conferences on the campaign trail and have been known to throw around the Clintons' considerable weight to block negative stories and influence coverage of the candidate they're protecting and promoting.


From all that I read the Clinton campaign has only recently become more open. The battles between staffers are brutal. Still, according to the Washington Post, Even in Victory, Clinton Team Is Battling Itself

Barack was once open to the press. Only in the last weeks since Hillary has he become more distant, or might I say defensive. When the Clinton Camp decided to attack with a barrage of accusation, some of which such as the North American Free Trade agreement and discussions, with Canada seem to be more true of her campaign than his, it seems Obama feels conversations have become confrontational. War with words are not his preferred style. He and his staffers rather not exchange barbs.

I invite your review and reflection . . .
Hillary Clinton; Executive Experience Explained

I think Americans will admit, Hillary Clinton is experienced. She knows how to change the conversation.

As for the advertisement, I think if was a reflection of Roy Spence's brilliance. A similar commercial worked for him, and his candidate Walter Mondale in 1984. What is disheartening to me is that Americans, absorbed in emotional reactions, think themselves rational.

May I offer a tome on the topic for your consideration. . .
Fear Factor; The Telephone Rings in the White House?

Betsy L. Angert
BeThink.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Hillary... John McCain called...
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 7, 2008 9:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He wants his ad back!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

3 AM
Posted by: fg on Mar 7, 2008 9:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually imagining HILL answer the phone at 3 AM gives a lot of people the creeps . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary and the hate-goons
Posted by: johnp on Mar 8, 2008 3:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I look at these responses, and see the same lame sex jokes about Bill Clinton. Are there really democrats so stupid, that they can't stop this childishness? Your stupidity is appalling. Clinton didn't engage in sexaual behavior that isn't commonplace in Washington or Arkansas. Everyone is doing it, so the more of these moronic jokes you tell, the more everyone sees you for what you are, a pathetic juvenile idiot, kinda like Bill Maher, who tells the same kinds of jokes, because his writers tell him to.
If Hillary's ad was an example of republican or rovian negativity, why did it work? This is another example of your stupidity. Hillary's 3am ad wasn't evil, it was brilliant. It raised doubts about Obama, not becaue it was sly or deceptive, but because it told truths about Obama, that his fawning idolators can't accept. The reality, is that Obama, in the lateness of the campaign, failed to pull it off. He was challenged by an ad, and didn't have the "right stuff" necessary to prove his case.
It's pathetic that his followers are so weak, so frightened, so frustrated, that they can't accept the verdict of the American people.
Media not only treated him with kid gloves for most of the first ten months of the campaign, they tried to boost his empty campaign. You can't accept that this soft treatment, this media hustle for him, was the real reason he had some wins early on. But even with this media support, even with financial superiority over Hillary, even with all the hate directed against her, even with all the "momentum" we were told he had, even with his "inspiration".... he lost. He not only lost Texas, a huge and humiliating defeat, but he was blown away in Ohio, and pulverized in Rhode Island. He may be able to persuade the politicians to give him the nomination, but, the people have seen through your tissue paper Messiah. He's managed to win, mostly, in the small, red States, where McCain will tear him apart. He lost "every" State with a populatin exceeding 10 million people. He'll almost certanly lose Pennsylvania, which will end up giving Hillary nearly a majority of the population of this country, simply in the 8 truly big States that matter, against McCain. Aside from Illinois, his own State, where 94% of the Blacks voted for him (whereas only 63% of Blacks voted for him ion New York), he will have lost, every big State. He lost California, a State with 37,000,000 people, by a staggering 17 points. He's all fluff and BS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]