Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McCain Repeatedly Lobbied FCC on Behalf of Campaign Donors

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 9:11 AM on March 1, 2008.


In 2000, Bush sharply criticized McCain for his unethical behavior. Now, Bush is blaming newspapers for highlighting McCain's lapses to the public.

Since The New York Times's explosive story on Feb. 21, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has been under intense scrutiny for his willingness to use his former position as chair of the Senate Commerce Committee to benefit campaign contributors.

In 1999,McCain wrote two controversial letters to the FCC on behalf of broadcaster and campaign contributor Lowell "Bud" Paxson. He urged the commissioners to make a "rapid decision on Paxson's quest to acquire a Pittsburgh television station." McCain had flown on Paxson's corporate jet on four occasions, and received $28,000 in contributions from Paxson and his law firm.

McCain has insisted that his letter-writing had nothing to do with Paxson. In fact, he claimed that he wasn't even on Paxson's side; he simply wanted the FCC to make a decision.

Yet the Paxson case wasn't an isolated incident. In 2000, reporters reviewed 2,000 pages of correspondences from McCain and his staff. They found that "in the vast majority of those particularly regulatory matters were Mr. McCain himself sent a letter, the interested parties had contributed to his presidential or Senate campaigns" [New York Times, 1/6/00]. Some examples:

- In 1998, McCain wrote the FCC a letter asking it to give "serious consideration" to allowing BellSouth to enter the long-distance market. Just four months earlier, on May 6, 1998, BellSouth officials had donated $16,750 to McCain. [Boston Globe, 1/9/00]

- In June 1998, McCain wrote to the FCC "on behalf of AT&T, Spring, and MCI Worldcom," even though he had "long favored the so-called Baby Bells." Two weeks later,Spring donated $2,000. In October 1998, AT&T officials gave him $25,800. [Boston Globe, 1/9/00]

- In May 1999, McCain wrote to the FCC and accused it of "bias against Ameritech and SBC Communications," two companies seeking to merge. Just before his May letter, "officials and lobbyists for the two companies helped him raise almost $120,000." Ameritech was led by Richard Notebaert, a "friend and leading fund-raiser" for McCain. [Boston Globe, 1/7/00; New York Times, 1/6/00]

- In 1998, McCain wrote two letters on behalf of satellite television companies Echostar and DirecTV, "in an effort help them win permission to carry local broadcast signals. Echostar's chairman raised about $25,000 for McCain" in the period between the two letters. [Boston Globe, 1/9/00]

- On Dec. 1, 1998, McCain wrote a letter to the FCC advocating against tighter restrictions, which were "clearly not in the spirit" of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. In the months before the letter, Paxson and Sinclair officials donated about $17,000 to McCain's campaign. [Boston Globe, 1/9/00]

In 2000, George W. Bush sharply criticized McCain for his unethical behavior. "I think it's really important for people who advocate reforms to live to the spirit of the reforms they advocate," said Bush. Now, however, Bush is blaming newspapers for highlighting McCain's lapses to the public.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, mccain, fcc, election00, telecoms, lobbyist, paxson

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Independent Exit Pollsters in Swing States Seek Volunteers
An independent effort led by noted academics is planning exit polls in Ohio, Missouri and Pennsylvania to verify the official vote count.
Post by Steven Freeman. October 7, 2008.
Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.
Bill Maher Kicks Zucker's Conservative Ass at the Box Office
The per-screen average of Religulous was three times that of the conservative film An American Carol.
Post by Jane Hamsher. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Will this bring McCain down?
Posted by: DreamFast on Mar 1, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps, but only if the MSN report on it.

The list of McCain's ethical lapses is long and his tepid response to the NYT article concerning them was meant to have these charges "go away".

But then the Right-wing pundits began wailing about how unfair the Times article was, focusing all their attention on the inferred sexual aspect of the story in hopes of obscurring the story's main premise - that McCain was favoring lobbyists for campaign contributions.

The pundits "volumized" a story that McCain desparately wanted to tamp down and make go away, which merely brought more attention and investigation to it. BY attempting to defend him, they may have done the exact opposite.

Is this irony lost on McCain?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And perhaps...
Posted by: DreamFast on Mar 1, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...this is exactly what the New York Times had in mind.

And to endorse him first, before publishing the story, they attempt to cover their tracks.

Like I said...perhaps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Like Bill Clinton, McCain Saved By Sex
Posted by: mrtshw on Mar 1, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the late 1990's, revelations in Canada were erupting regarding the truly depraved record of Bill Clinton's Arkansas years. Canada was a primary consumer of Aids/Hepatitis infected blood products that Clinton had allowed to be harvested from Arkansas' prison inmates throughout the 1980s. He did this despite his clear knowledge the blood was fatally contaminated and he did it to placate powerful political reptiles with ties to the Department of Corrections who were being enriched by it (www.cbc.ca/news/background/taintedblood). As such, I wouldn't be surprised if the Lucianne Goldberg,Jonah Goldberg, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, sex scandal eruption was a deliberate smokescreen to divert attention away from the Clintons' " real " scandals. Sex introduced in the current McCain story serves a similar function.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal
Posted by: mrtshw on Mar 1, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Arkansas prison blood scandal resulted from the state’s selling plasma extracted from prisoners at the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC). Corruption among the administrators of the prison blood program and poor supervision resulted in disease-tainted blood, often carrying hepatitis or HIV, knowingly being shipped to blood brokers, who in turn shipped it to Canada, Europe, and Asia. Revelation of the misdeeds and the healthcare crisis it created in Canada nearly brought down the Liberal Party government in 1997. In 1994, Arkansas became the last state to stop selling plasma extracted from prisoners.
Arkansas’s prison blood program began in 1964 as a way for both prisoners and the prison system to make money. (Arkansas law forbids paying prisoners for their labor.) Set up by Birmingham, Alabama, physician August R. Staugh, it was, from 1967 to 1978, managed at various times by a group of physicians from the University of Arkansas Medical Sciences Campus (now the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences) in Little Rock (Pulaski County) and by the Department of Correction itself. In 1978, the state contracted with Health Management Associates Inc. (HMA), founded by pediatrician Francis “Bud” Henderson of Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), to run both the prison medical program and the plasma program. HMA sold each unit of plasma for fifty dollars, and the donating prisoner was usually paid seven dollars in scrip.
**********************************************
The prison plasma program ended in 1994, but its effects linger. More than 1,000 Canadians who received plasma contaminated by that drawn from Arkansas prisoners were infected with HIV and 20,000 with hepatitis C. Arkansas officials have never apologized for its role in the blood scandal nor sought to reimburse victims for their suffering.
**********************************************

The Arkansas prison blood scandal was the subject of a novel, titled Blood Trail (1998), written by former HMA employee Mike Galster under the pseudonym Michael Sullivan. The scandal also has been the subject of a documentary movie, Factor 8: The Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal, directed by Kelly Duda, which was released in 2005 and drew worldwide attention to the events.
In England, Lord Peter Archer of Sandwell began, in March 2007, a public inquiry into contaminated blood given to British hemophilia patients in the 1970s and 1980s. At the beginning of the inquiry, the number of deaths from blood contaminated with hepatitis C and HIV in England stood at 1,757 out of over 6,000 infected; blood extracted from Arkansas prisoners has been linked to this contamination. The inquiry has heard testimony from victims, healthcare workers, investigative journalists (including filmmaker Duda), and more. It is expected to deliver a report later in 2007.
**********************************************

Guy Lancaster
Encyclopedia of Arkansas History & Culture
Last Updated 8/16/2007
About this Entry: Contact us / Submit a Comment / Submit a Narrative

www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The article is about McCain
Posted by: PJAW on Mar 3, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow, even here, a mention of Republican corruption almost inevitably devolves into a discussion of the shenanigans (true or alleged) of Bill Clinton.

To get back on topic, MCCAIN IS CORRUPT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Puppet Bushie is in no position to crititicize anyone!!!!
Posted by: xvictor on Mar 3, 2008 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because he himself is always ripe for targeted criticism, that dumb neocon twerp.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Bush!
Posted by: Magginkat on Mar 3, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's almost laughable that Bush thinks the newspapers are attacking his bosom buddy, John McCain.

One thing we can thank bush for is the fact that he has been so brazen with his crimes & corruption that it has exposed the total corruption of politics, especially Republican politics. Under this sorryass administration the old war lords in the Repugnant Party have seemed happy to jump on the public bandwagon of corruption & lies. John McCain is at the top of the kiss Bushass list as a part of his desperate bid for the presidency.

I hope that a new Democratic administration will bring some of these crminals to trial & that it results in long jail sentences for a lot of them, bush included.

Of course I realize that Junior bush probably has a stack of pardons a mile high to be released before he leaves office.... Including his own! (Can he pardon himself???) Don't be surprised if he tries!




[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]