Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Canadian Embassy Says Obama/NAFTA Rumours are False

Posted by GottaLaff , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 3:17 PM on February 28, 2008.


Good thing Obama's rapid response was nimble enough to jump on this so quickly.
sobamablackcaucuslarge
Obama

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Of course it is. When will we ever learn? Here's the backstory. Here's the correction:

Roy Norton, the minister of public affairs for the Canadian embassy, is flatly denying that any Obama campaign official spoke to the Canadian ambassador in recent days or told him that Obama's anti-NAFTA stump speech is merely "campaign rhetoric."
"No, none," Norton told me when I asked him if Michael Wilson, Canada's ambassador to the U.S., had spoken to any Obama advisers recently. He added: "Neither before the Ohio debate nor since has any presidential campaign called Ambassador Wilson about NAFTA."
Oh. Okay then. I wonder if the corporate media will run with it anyway. ::stifling laughter::
Norton did allow, however, that the embassy on the staff level had discussed multiple issues, including NAFTA, with the Obama and Hillary campaigns at various times, and had urged them to look at NAFTA in a positive light.
Good thing Obama's rapid response was nimble enough to jump on this so quickly. That's another good sign of things to come when the opposition accuses him of really bad things like, you know, being a Muslim or not wearing flag pins or something.

H/t: CLG

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, canada, nafta

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Canadian guy
Posted by: Bigioni on Feb 29, 2008 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You better get past your "fan club" level of political analysis. I can tell you that the Canadian news coverage of this story indicates that high level sources remain adamant that the Obama and Clinton camps both assured them that NAFTA wouldn't be touched. I want to trust Obama, but the fact is that John Edwards was the only candidate that could have been trusted to seriously examine the NAFTA (or health care for that matter.) The remaining candidates are bought and paid for and they will keep you in Iraq for a very long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Canadian guy..Aussie Guy Posted by: Captainmagic
Don't forget the military ramifications of NAFTA
Posted by: manderson on Feb 29, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Found this the other day in the Vancouver Sun...

“Canada-U.S. pact allows cross-border military activity. Deal allows either country to send troops across the other’s border to deal with an emergency”

Is this the next phase of NAFTA? The Canadians are righteously pissed…

And I'll bet Obama doesn't touch this one, either. You are NOT getting a choice with Obama---he is advised by the "realist" camp of the neo-liberals, with Zbigeniew Brzezinski in charge. The only positive thing you can say is that they might buy us a little time from the effects of Peak Oil, but they WILL NOT dismantle ANY part of the National Security State the U.S. has become. The fact that the U.S. is trying to take control of African Oil with Bush's cutesy little trip over there is another sign...Mr. Obama can be a blue chip in our (excuse me, the OIL COMPANIES') efforts to (keep on) raping and pillaging that continent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PS
Posted by: manderson on Feb 29, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't matter what color, religion, or creed you are---it's whether or not you SIGN ON the the corporate agenda. Obama has SIGNED ON. The problem is SYSTEMIC, not just a few bad guys sitting around with bad ideas. The system MUST be pulled from the ground, root and branch, before anything resembling a society that is equitable to humans will appear on this earth. That's not to say it will be easy or even equitable at first...then the hard work starts. The power mongers will ALWAYS be there, telling the rest of us that we deserve to be slaves of one sort or another, and offering us crumbs as bait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]