Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

GOP Engages in 'Political Extortion', Draws Up Hit List of Dem Lawmakers

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 2:10 PM on February 27, 2008.


Democratic lawmakers on the GOP list include John Murtha, Jim Moran, and John Conyers, among others.
boehner4
Boehner

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In 2007, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) pushed forward on her pledge to run the most ethical Congress in history and established the House Ethics Enforcement Task Force. She charged the group with setting up an Office of Congressional Ethics, an "independent ethics panel" composed of six "nonpartisan professional staff" members who were jointly appointed by the Speaker and Minority Leader. Lawmakers and lobbyists would be barred from serving.

The House is expected to vote on the task force's proposal on Thursday. Even though this committee will be independent and nonpartisan, the GOP is already resisting. In an attempt to dissuade Democrats from voting for the ethics office, senior House Republican aides are drawing up a hit list of 10 Democratic lawmakers who would be pursued with ethics investigations if the measure passes. National Journal reports (sub. req'd):

Senior House Republican aides are drawing up a list of Democrats to target if the House votes Thursday to create an independent panel to weigh ethics complaints against lawmakers.

In a move that one top Democratic lawmaker called "political extortion," House GOP aides said Tuesday the names of more than 10 Democrats are likely to end up on the list and that investigations would be pursued against all of them.

It is not clear how much support House Republican leaders are giving to the staff effort, but several GOP leadership aides who were asked about the list said they were aware of it.

Democratic lawmakers on the GOP list include John Murtha (PA), Jim Moran (VA), and John Conyers (MI), among others.

Pursuing investigations against lawmakers is one thing. But holding off on the investigations to blackmail lawmakers is another. "If they have legitimate ethics concerns about any member, why wouldn't they bring it forward now?" wondered Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA), who chairs the ethics task force.

If Boehner is truly serious about his pledge "to enforce a tougher ethical standard in the 110th Congress," he should disavow this hit list.

Digg!

Tagged as: murtha, ethics, conyers, boehner, democratic congress, pelsi

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Obama Expands on Economic Plan, Emphasizes 'J-O-B-S'
Obama struck an optimistic yet pragmatic tone in a policy speech on the economy today.
Post by Steve Benen. October 13, 2008.
McCain Makes the Case Against Himself
Next President "won’t have the luxury of studying up on the issues."
Post by Faiz Shakir. October 13, 2008.
TONIGHT: Incredible Iraq Documentary 'Section 60'
Filmmakers Jon Alpert and Matthew O'Neill's latest doc will air tonight on HBO at 9pm (EST).
Post by Staff. October 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why do you bother?
Posted by: drmflorida on Feb 27, 2008 2:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does Alternet so frequently end blog posts like this...

"If [insert Republican blowhard] really believes [insert absurd bloviation] (s)he should [insert reasonable action]."

They are hypocrites and liars. Why give them the benefit of the doubt? Aren't you tired of constant disappointment?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why do you bother? Posted by: ikonoklast
Take out ALL the crooks...
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Feb 27, 2008 11:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
regardless of party affiliation.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Take out ALL the crooks... Posted by: JSquercia
If Dems talk the talk
Posted by: lb on Feb 28, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they have to walk the walk. The strongest statement the Dems could make about ethics reform is to clean their own house. I know from raising children the power of "do as I do, not as I say". I want my elected officials to adhere to the HIGHEST ethical standard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We should be grateful
Posted by: xbj on Feb 28, 2008 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should be grateful that they don't just call on Poppy Bush and his trusty CIA rifle to take care of things the way they used to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We should be grateful Posted by: willymack
The problem is.....
Posted by: seacaptdon on Feb 28, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that with the majority of politicians, integrity and character and ethics seems to have been thrown out upon election. This is true with all parties.
For instance, how ethical is it to support something without even reading it or doing any research just because the current president or leadership of the party wants it?
How ethical is it when a "representative" ignores the constituents and votes as their party wants?
How ethical is it when a majority in Congress rubber-stamps something a President wants simply because they are of the same party? Or in the converse, votes against something because the President is the opposite party?
I am not saying that standing on party platform is a bad thing but it seems that the only thing that matters to politicians anymore is power and control, and in this pursuit they have forsaken integrity and character and ethics. And unfortunately, my former party, the Republicans are the worst of the lot, which is why I have decided to support a candidate that has proven himself to be a gentleman on a steady course no matter if it is a bitchy woman candidate or a bitchy Republican candidate that is attacking him. It is past time for a real change in the political environment in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]