Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Missing White House Emails: Gone and Never Coming Back

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 10:13 AM on February 27, 2008.


80 White House officials routinely used private email accounts for government business, and the RNC deleted all WH emails through 2004.
bush434

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The last we heard from the White House on the subject of its missing emails, one presidential spokesperson was telling the nation, "I wouldn't rule out that there were a potential 5 million e-mails lost.... We screwed up, and we're trying to fix it," while another presidential spokesperson was also telling the nation that White House officials have "absolutely no reason to believe that any emails are missing."

It's the kind of clear, helpful explanation we've come to expect from the Bush gang.

Yesterday, we learned that untold millions of emails are gone, and they're never coming back.

After promising last year to search its computers for tens of thousands of e-mails sent by White House officials, the Republican National Committee has informed a House committee that it no longer plans to retrieve the communications by restoring computer backup tapes, the panel's chairman said yesterday.

The move increases the likelihood that an untold number of RNC e-mails dealing with official White House business during the first term of the Bush administration -- including many sent or received by former presidential adviser Karl Rove -- will never be recovered, said House Democrats and public records advocates.

The RNC had previously told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that it was attempting to restore e-mails from 2001 to 2003, when the RNC had a policy of purging all e-mails, including those to and from White House officials, after 30 days. But Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) disclosed during a hearing yesterday that the RNC has now said it "has no intention of trying to restore the missing White House e-mails."

"The result is a potentially enormous gap in the historical record," Waxman said, including the buildup to the Iraq war.

Despite laws mandating otherwise, 80 White House officials routinely used private email accounts for government business, and the RNC deleted all WH emails through 2004. (Karl Rove, for example, sent or received 140,000 e-mails on RNC servers from 2002 to 2007, and more than half involved official ".gov" accounts.)

Worse, this is only half the problem.

While dozens of top Bush aides were circumventing the Presidential Records Act with private emails, the White House was also responsible for creating a "primitive" email system of its own that created a high risk that data would be lost.

Steven McDevitt's written statements, placed on the public record at a congressional hearing, asserted that a study by White House technical staff in October 2005 turned up an estimated 1,000 days on which e-mail was missing.

Two federal laws require electronic messages to be preserved. [...]

In his written statements, McDevitt said he participated in meetings with White House counsel Harriet Miers and members of her staff. The meetings, in December 2005 and early 2006, occurred around the time McDevitt and other technical staffers were trying to determine how much e-mail was missing from the White House.

In a report presented at the hearing, Waxman's Democratic staff said difficulties arose in recovering e-mails for Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald in the CIA leak probe. Fitzgerald publicly disclosed the fact that the White House had an e-mail problem in early 2006.

There were no archived e-mails from the office of Vice President Dick Cheney from Sept. 30, 2003, to Oct. 6, 2003, just as the Justice Department was launching its investigation into whether anyone at the White House leaked Valerie Plame's CIA identity, according to documents provided to the House panel. The only e-mails that could be recovered for prosecutors were from the personal e-mail accounts of officials in Cheney's office, according to the report by Waxman's staff.

McDevitt's statements detailed shortcomings that he said have plagued the White House e-mail system for six years. He declared that:

* The White House had no complete inventory of e-mail files.

* Until mid-2005 the e-mail system had serious security flaws, in which "everyone" on the White House computer network had access to e-mail. McDevitt wrote that the "potential impact" of the security flaw was that there was no way to verify that retained data had not been modified.

* There was no automatic system to ensure that e-mails were archived and preserved.

Perhaps most startling of all, the Bush Administration managed to dismantle, apparently on purpose, the Clinton Administration's email archive system -- which worked just fine -- without replacing it with anything at all.

So, the emails from the RNC servers are gone, and the emails from the White House servers are gone. Coincidentally, the more important the dates and subject matter (Iraq war, White House criminal investigation), the more likely the emails are gone for good.

If there's a reasonable defense for the White House's handling of this, I honestly can't think of it.

Digg!

Tagged as: republican party, rnc, white house emails, bush administration

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Hallmark Gets Down with Same-Sex Marriage
Now same-sex couples can receive incredibly earnest cards at their weddings too.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 21, 2008.
McCain Office Is Sent White Powder, Threat
CBS: McCain's campaign office in Denver, CO has received a letter containing a threat and "an amount of white powder in it"
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.
Iran: NBA Succeeds Where Bush Administration Failed
You can assume that NBA teams won't be calling in Condoleezza Rice to help with negotiations.
Post by Faiz Shakir. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Secrets Contained
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 27, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the NSA has MY emails. Maybe someone should check their computers for the "missing" White House emails. I mean, there are at least 16 US intelligence agencies. And the White House wants us to believe that no one in any of those agencies bothered to spy on the White House's own emails?
Those emails are there... somewhere. Too bad, though, that the only people with a high enough security clearance to get at them are Bush and Cheney and maybe a few other higher-ups who also have a conflict of interest. And maybe all copies of the emails possessed by God-knows-whom have been ordered destroyed -- like some videotapes we know of.

As for the contents of the White House emails: Use your imagination. Assume the worst. You KNOW that the emails contain very damning evidence against this administration -- maybe evidence SO damning that even Nancy Pelosi would make impeachment a possibility. What is the White House otherwise afraid of if this isn't so?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come on, hackers!!!
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Feb 27, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is your X Prize competition! 5 million missing e-mails - go get 'em!

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeach
Posted by: dayenta on Feb 27, 2008 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We were about to impeach a president for some missing minutes of tape, and then he resigned. Why aren't those clowns in Congress acting on this??? (Rhetorical question)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If there was even a scrap of decency in this circus called Washington...
Posted by: lexicon on Feb 27, 2008 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...then the FBI would descend on every member of the administration, and confiscate every single computer that any of these clowns has ever touched, wherever they may find one, and run forensic recovery on each and every one...under the auspices of the National Archives.

In the meantime, who OUGHT to be going to jail for this? I would imagine the White House chief of staff? Also, of course, the VP chief of staff (the fourth branch of govt...)




...but of course, it's far too late for that. Those servers/computers/laptops have all been thoroughly cleaned by now.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Shortcomings"
Posted by: Xynyx on Feb 27, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"shortcomings that he said have plagued the White House e-mail system for six years"

yeah, right...

just like I've been plagued by piles of laundered but unfolded clothes on my bed...

What sort of idiots do they take us for? More importantly, which people in Congress are swallowing these "short comings"?

These are no shortcomings, folks, this has all been one long, rough, unlubricated fuck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lost? federal crime
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Feb 27, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why aren't these motherfuckers in jail????? congress? anybody?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, as I see it...
Posted by: Suz on Feb 27, 2008 6:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...we are left to draw one of only two possible conclusions:

1. This was an intentional criminal act.
2. This administration is rife with incompetence.

Hmmmm........I choose.....

3. All of the above.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "the force is strong with this one" Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
impeach & prosecute
Posted by: bluesmanjohnson on Feb 28, 2008 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't Congress doing anything about this? Appoint a f-ing special prosecutor already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mukasey just announced
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 29, 2008 6:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he won't go after Harriet Miers or Josh Bolten for ignoring the subpoenas of the Judiciary committees... so there is no way in hell the IN-Justice Department will go after these missing emails.

Where is our John Dean, Eliot Richardson & William Ruckelshaus? They resigned because they would not do the political bidding of Nixon!

I wish there was one honest person in the DOJ that would stand up and do the right thing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]