Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Are We One Unforseen Crisis Away from a Military Draft?

Posted by Daniel DiRito, The All Spin Zone at 5:42 AM on February 20, 2008.


Truth be told, most Americans still look at military service as an abstract notion that rarely hits home.
1120draftcard
Draft

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Reading between the lines of a newly released survey of current and former military officers seems to suggest that the U.S. military may be one unexpected military crisis away from the need to reinstitute the draft. Those who doubt that the war in Iraq is a drain on our military may want to reconsider the merits of that never ending conflict.

The fact that the bulk of the American public's military assessments are filtered through the prism of the powers that be...a la the Bush administration...can be rather misleading and may well engender a false sense of security. Implied in these assessments is an assurance that our nation is being sufficiently protected from harm. It's not only possible that this is a rose colored view; we may be one unforeseen crisis away from the need to reinstitute a military draft.

A survey of a few thousand current and former military officers overwhelmingly concludes that our military has been stretched dangerously thin by the war in Iraq. What the survey doesn't state may be the ominous six hundred pound gorilla in the room.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military has been stretched dangerously thin by the Iraq war, according to almost 90 percent of retired and current military officers polled on the state of America's armed forces.

Eighty percent said it would be unreasonable to expect the U.S. military to wage another major war successfully at this time, according to the poll by the Center for a New American Security think tank and Foreign Policy magazine.

More than 3,400 serving and retired officers took part in the poll, organizers said. Around 90 percent were retired officers, a large majority had combat experience and about 10 percent had served in Iraq or Afghanistan.

"We are putting more strains on the all-volunteer force than it was ever designed to bear," Army Lt. Col. John Nagl, a prominent counterinsurgency expert, said at a panel discussion in Washington on Tuesday to announce the results of the survey.

Eighty-eight percent of respondents said the U.S. military had been stretched dangerously thin by Iraq. Sixty percent said the military was weaker than five years ago, 25 percent said it was stronger and 15 percent said it was about the same.

Truth be told, most Americans still look at military service as an abstract notion that rarely hits home. Yes, they are aware of the failings evidenced during the execution of the Iraq war and the tragic and prolonged loss of life...but they rarely have to worry that their family members might face the prospect of a draft.

If this survey provided only one insight, it should be a recognition that we may be one military crisis away from the necessity to reinstate a policy of involuntary military service. Even more disquieting is the prospect that we may not be able to properly respond to an unexpected military conflict.

In reality, the implementation of a draft would not facilitate an instantaneously fortified military nor would it come without a tremendous price tag. Hence, we could well find ourselves in the unenviable position of having to prioritize our military engagements...or prosecute them with dangerously compromised strategies.

Not only does that suggest a level of vulnerability not seen since being forced to ramp up in order to meet the challenge of past World Wars...it points out just how absurd it was for George Bush to ask Americans to go shopping in the aftermath of 9/11. It also demonstrates the inherent short-sightedness of our commander in chief and the degree to which he prefers placation and prevarication to the direct dissemination of the low-down.

The fact that we have repeatedly found ourselves in unrevealed and/or unexpected positions and predicaments suggests that Americans shouldn't take comfort in the assurances that a draft is out of the question.

A look at the recent Pakistani election and the evaporating power of Pervez Musharraf highlights our current president's propensity to put all of America's proverbial eggs into one basket. All too often that basket has turned out to be a leaky sieve filled with little more than broken and empty shells. The need for a draft may be the next egg scheduled for a surprise scrambling. That would not be a delectable dish.

Digg!

Tagged as: us military, military draft

Daniel DiRito is a blogger of The All Spin Zone


Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
i hope a draft into the military does begin
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 20, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
americans will finally realize the true cost of war (it ain't just treasure and volunteers) and finally get off their collective asses and quit feeding the military beast.

in that light, a mccain presidency and his 100 year wars might be a good thing . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» damn it! Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Sounds like resignation Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» Trying to insure... Posted by: hurricane hugo
Stop the War - Don't Enlist
Posted by: truthteller on Feb 20, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have advocated a campaign like this for several years now. The American people will not stand for a draft, and a Democratically controlled Congress will not pass one (and if they do, we'll know who to defeat for re-election). Any call for one will bring a quicker end to this horrible occupation in Iraq. I wish the anti-war movement would adopt this strategy. As was stated in the above article, recruitment is already borderline, and a campaign to cut enlistment that is even 50% effective would have a devastating impact on the Administration's ability to continue our hegemonic, saber-rattling ways. It would put a permanent end to any threat to invade Iran, and force our withdrawal from many of our foreign bases. We need to quit being an empire and become a good and fair citizen of the World. Denying these fascist militants an army to engage in their aggression and resource theft is the first step in that process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A draft would be a generation shaping event
Posted by: Bobsays on Feb 20, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it would create a great generation of Americans who would be mature enough to meet the country's future. The infantile youth of today need such a wake-up.

People forget what is mostly a wonderful experience to serve. The military offers structure and discipline and builds character.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANTI-WAR BUT PRO MILITARY SERVICE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 20, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People can't live completely detached from something as important as defending their country should the need arise. We're in Iraq because service was NOT mandatory and they still sell the BS that they're volunteers and that makes eveything OK. It doesn't. The bright idea of 'voluntary' didn't work. We have the poor and non-citizens fighting a contrived war. A legitimate military can PREVENT war. It's reason to negotiate alternatives. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cannon Fodder
Posted by: Gaubladt on Feb 20, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the military had a draft for the past 6 years, the war dead would be much greater than 3300. It wuld be mure like 50000; just like vietnam. They would be blowing gi's the same way they do money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cannon Fodder Posted by: Keebie
» Blank check mentality with human life Posted by: andabottleof_rum
Everything is contrived because--
Posted by: Doubtom on Feb 20, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
--the truth does not serve their purpose.

If we are but one crisis away from a draft, you can bet your ass that it will be orchestrated just like all the others in our colorful history. The other thing on which you can bet the farm is that if it does occur, so will a revolution.
The people have had quite enough of serving as cannon fodder for the elite cowards masquerading as leaders. Are you listening Bush/Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle,Lieberman, Frum, Wurmser, Kristol and the rest of the lily-white pansies who are leading us to hell with the assistance of AIPAC and the other 'Israel-first' jewish committees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There should have been a draft instituted Sept 12, 2001.
Posted by: thekidde on Feb 20, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the first to go should have been the kids of all of the politicians at the local, state and federal level. We wouldn't be at war with anyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DRAFTEES WOULD BE FORCED TO COMMIT WAR CRIMES
Posted by: outrider on Feb 20, 2008 7:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if I am elected I promise that there will be no draft. Have any of the presidential candidates made such a promise?

McCain cannot carry out his campaign promises of war, war, and more war without a draft and even then there would not be enough bodies to do the job, SO the Commander in Chief would have to order a nuclear strike to save us from the evil ones who never attacked us in the first place.

Neither Senators Clinton or Obama have made their positions regarding a draft clear to my knowledge. Our shadow government, the ultimate warmongers, will go along with the candidate most likely to do their bidding. Its members (the leaders of the industrial/military complex, the media, and the multinational corporations aided and abetterd by the religious heretics on the right) are determined to transform our Constitutional republic into a militaristic empire governed by selected members of their elite aristocracy. They want a President who will do their bidding. To date, based on the direct and indirect support being given to Senator Obama by the media and endorsements by people like Senators Kerry and Kennedy, and the medias's damnation of Senator Clinton, their choice appears to be Senator Obama. Whether Obama would have or have not voted for the bill authorizing the invasion of Iraq, there are indications that he has not rejected neoconservatism spelled W A R. such as his willingness to invade Palistine if HE thought it necessary.

Whoever is elected should be aware that the war is contrary to international law and treaties which are a part of our Constitution. Would the People want their sons and daughters drafted in order to commit war crimes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from a viet nam vet
Posted by: jwpa13 on Feb 24, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i agree with those that are anti-war but pro draft. only when the majority of americans have a direct interest in the wars we let our country become involved in will the majority of americans become interested enough to ask themselves if these wars are for the common good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]