Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush’s '09 Budget: 'As Good As It Gets For Defense Contractors'

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 2:24 PM on February 11, 2008.


Defense experts are surprised at how generous the Bush administration is willing to be with the taxpayers' money.
bushdesk

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Last week, President Bush submitted his $515.4 billion defense spending budget for FY '09. Contained within that budget is a windfall for defense contractors -- "$104.2 billion for weapons procurement and nearly $80 billion for research and development." This budget is 7.5 percent higher than the current year's.

Even Defense experts are surprised at how generous the Bush administration is willing to be with the taxpayers' money, in light of a faltering economy and deep cuts to domestic programs:

"The expectation has been that it can't continue to increase as it has," Phil Finnegan, a defense analyst at the Teal Group in Fairfax, said of defense spending. "But it has surprised everyone to see how long this increase has continued. This budget was a great budget for all defense contractors." [...]

"The fiscal year 2009 budget may be about as good as it gets for defense contractors," said Steve Kosiak, vice president of budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "We have had eight years of quite dramatic growth in [the Defense Department's] weapons acquisition accounts. Whoever the next president is, it is unlikely that we are going to continue a major buildup.

The administration may get its way on many of these spending requests. The military has dispatched "legions of lobbyists and defense contractors" to Capitol Hill to push for approval. Several lawmakers are actually asking for spending above what the administration requested. Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX) and James Inhofe (R-OK), for example, are lobbying for F-22 fighter planes, even though Defense Secretary Robert Gates has deemed more of these useless planes unnecessary.

A 2007 report by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform found that between 2000 and 2005, procurement was the "fastest growing component of federal discretionary spending." Non-competitive and sole-source contractors rose "by 115% from $67.5 billion in 2000 to $145 billion in 2005."

Click for larger version

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, us military, federal budget, defense department

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's pretty good for the artificial limb industry, as well.
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Feb 11, 2008 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Investment analysts are bullish on the prosthetics industry worldwide. Smart money is going into funds that finance undertakers throughout the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The word is "magnates", doof. Posted by: rancespergl
» RE: The word is "magnates", doof. Posted by: nochicagoboys
bush has finally uveiled...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Feb 12, 2008 2:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
his REAL economic stimulus package, sigh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» that should say: unveiled Posted by: undrgrndgirl
It won't matter - crony corporations will already have their cash up front
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Feb 18, 2008 6:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And we'll be stuck with the bill for things never delivered, just like always with this administration. This whole "War On Everything" has been the most out-in-the-open grab and giveaway for cash, power and resources I could have imagined. I've never thought much of my fellow Americans in general, but even I'm astounded not to have long since seen rioting in the streets.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]