Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Three Co-Chairs of the DNC Delegate Credentials Board All Served Under Clinton

Posted by Mark Karlin, BuzzFlash at 2:11 PM on February 8, 2008.


The DNC Credentials Committee could play such a pivotal role in terms of a decision regarding the status of the Michigan and Florida delegations.
hill3
Hillary

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Democracy and Elections in your
mailbox!

 

If I've learned one thing this primary season, it's that passion is back among the Democrats for their presidential candidates. Anybody who reads the BuzzFlash Mailbag can see that in an instant. That can be a good thing or a bad thing.

It is the most fundamental sign of health in a democracy to see people so energized and willing to voice their opinions. But if it leads to a split party after the nomination, it would mean four more years of Republican rule and that would not be good for our Constitution and our freedom.

With that in mind, we'll throw some more wood on the fire with this follow-up to our alert yesterday on the likely role of the DNC Credentials Committee in deciding what to do about the unsanctioned Michigan and Florida "primaries." (In our view, they weren't primaries because there was no real campaigning in the states -- and in Michigan only Hillary Clinton's name was on the ballot.)

In January, BuzzFlash proposed one possible solution; some people in the DNC are proposing another. The latter plan would include party caucuses in Michigan and Florida in the early summer. That would be a sensible idea, but the Clinton campaign opposes it. One can assume that they are not happy with Obama's strength in caucus states.

But there may be another reason. If the "results" of the non-primary primaries were upheld by DNC Credentials Committee prior to the convention, and the convention delegates accepted the Credentials Committee recommendation to seat the delegates under the current distribution, Hillary Clinton would likely win the nomination.

According to the Washington Post, mathematically it is almost impossible for either Clinton or Obama to win based on the pledged delegates in the upcoming contests. So, at this moment, it is likely that the superdelegates will potentially decide the winner. But remember that there are still a small number of delegates pledged to other candidates sitting out there. It is possible that Clinton and Obama will end up so close in the delegate count that neither of them will attain the threshold number of delegates needed to be nominated.

That is why the DNC Credentials Committee could play such a pivotal role in terms of a decision regarding the status of the Michigan and Florida delegations, if the Clinton and Obama camps do not agree to caucuses that would allow for a full campaign in each state.

That leads us to the three co-chairs of the DNC Credentials Committee: Alexis Herman, James Roosevelt, Jr. and Aliseo Roques-Arroyo. All three of them served in the Clinton Administration. Okay, as far as we know they are all reputable, upstanding people, but if you were Hillary Clinton and these three people worked for you and your husband during the 8 presidential years Hillary includes on her "35 years of experience," wouldn't you feel like you might have some influence on the three co-chairs? After all, the decision of the DNC Credentials Committee will be political; this is not a judicial process.

According to the official background statements, in a DNC convention committee .pdf file, here are the Clinton connections:

Alexis Herman

Alexis Herman served as U.S. Secretary of Labor from 1997 to 2001. Her accomplishments as Labor Secretary include negotiating between UPS management and Teamsters Union leaders, ultimately ending the ten-day strike. Her extensive political experience began during the Carter Administration when she served as the Director of the Women's Bureau. In 1980 she left government to become an entrepreneur and labor relations expert. Secretary Herman served as DNC Chief of Staff for Chairman Ron Brown and later was named CEO of the 1992 Democratic National Convention. In 1993, she was appointed assistant to the President and Director of the White House public liaison office. Since 2005, Secretary Herman has served as a Co-Chair of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee and also served as a Co-Chair of the Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling

James Roosevelt, Jr.

Jim Roosevelt is President and CEO of Tufts Health Plan, a Massachusetts based HMO. Prior to joining Tufts Health Plan, Mr. Roosevelt was the Associate Commissioner for Retirement Policy of the Social Security Administration in the Clinton Administration and a partner in Choate, Hall & Stewart, specializing in health care law. Mr. Roosevelt is the chief legal counsel for the Massachusetts Democratic Party. Since 1995, he has served as Co-Chair of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee and has served as a DNC member since 1980.

Eliseo Roques-Arroyo

A native of Puerto Rico, Eliseo Roques-Arroyo served as Executive Assistant to Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Senate Minority Leader Miguel Hernandez-Agosto and to Puerto Rico Delegate to Congress Antonio J. Colorado. A former Executive Director of the Democratic Party of Puerto Rico, Mr. Roques-Arroyo served as a consultant on travel and advance for President Clinton from 1998-2000. He is a graduate of Cornell University and the Inter American University of Puerto Rico School of Law. He is presently a member of the Democratic National Committee.

(Yes, James Roosevelt, Jr., is the grandson of FDR.)

Politics is politics -- and Hillary Clinton got the luck of the draw in the appointment of the three co-chairs of the Credentials Committee. They were appointed by Howard Dean, we believe, and Dean will be toast as DNC Chairman if Hillary is elected. Although he is neutral, as he should be, in the battle for the nomination, there is no love lost between Dean and the Clinton camp. So, we're no in anyway implying some vast conspiracy here.

It is true that the Credentials Committee itself will consist of many, many people by the time it makes the crucial Michigan/Florida decision, if it comes down to that. Only the core committee has been chosen as of now, so it is impossible to project the political leanings of the committee as a whole. However, there is no doubt that the Clinton camp has the inside advantage when it comes to the three co-chairs.

That's just the reality of the situation.

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, democratic party, dnc, delegates, super delegaates

Mark Karlin is the Editor and Publisher of BuzzFlash.com


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Something Should Be Done
Posted by: indepentent on Feb 8, 2008 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There needs to be another nubias selection of three Co-Chairs of the DNC Delegate Credentials Board immediatley!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some actual research would have served you well
Posted by: bri on Feb 8, 2008 3:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jessica Biel is part Choctaw (that means "Native American", you jackass).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can you say...
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 9, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
F-I-X???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Major Backlash
Posted by: truthfinder on Feb 9, 2008 11:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Hill-Bill win the nomination in this fashion, there will be a major backlash against them and the Democratic Party. The Republican candidate could rightly argue that Hill-Bill didn't even legitimately win their own party's nomination, thus why should anyone vote for them? Not only that, it would disenfranchise so many Democrats into not voting in November, the result would be a Republican victory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To save the US from further disaster
Posted by: oxheadone on Feb 10, 2008 1:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the democrats have to win the coming Presidential election. It has to be the 'dream ticket'. Clinton and Obama have to sit down and toss a coin to decide who should be president first. This might give us 16 decent years of national politics. Since Clinton is older, it may seem more appropriate for her to be first. BUT, it has to be an open agreement and they both have to try all out to beat the warmonger and the religious nut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I don't see it Posted by: redfrog
Let's stop all the negativity!
Posted by: funintheflsun on Feb 10, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a life long Democrat I find it very disturbing that all these Clinton haters continue to bash Hillary. If your candidate is Obama then support your candidate but don't be so hateful towards Clinton. Either of our candidates will be far superior to what the Republicans are offering and it concerns me when I hear comments like "if Hillary wins it will split the party and I will never vote for her"....thats a sad commentary on some of our fellow Democrats. The writer of this article thinks it is "reasonable" for Michigan and Florida to now hold caucuses and let a small group decide who wins them. This is ridiculous!
Both states had record numbers of Democrats that voted and made their choice. Now you are suggesting we let a small group of caucus goers decide where the delegates will go regardless of what the voters wanted?? You criticize the Clintons saying they are trying to steal the nomination, yet Obama's people now support holding these ridiculous caucuses and disenfranchising all those that voted. I live in Florida and in spite of the pledge not to campaign here, it was Obama who ran commercials here for a few weeks prior to the primary, Clinton did not. Their excuse is that they bought a nationwide package that just so happened to play in Florida?!?! It was Obama who chose to take his name off the Michigan ballot, Hillary did not. Come on, people wake up...both of these candidates are politicians trying to win this nomination. I like Obama and will support him if he is the nominee of our party but I'm not going to be blinded by all the wonderful oratory about a new kind of politics when all I see is more of the same. Let's support whoever is our nominee...our real enemy is more Republican rule!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's stop all the negativity! Posted by: WorldViewer
» RE: Let's stop all the negativity! Posted by: sui_generis