Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mitt Quits '08 Presidential Race

Posted by Steven Reynolds, The All Spin Zone at 10:34 AM on February 7, 2008.


After spending $1.16MM per delegate, one would think Republican voters would be enamored of Mitt Romney
54ff5d12a6704358a17af07691b2137a
Mitt Quits

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

After spending $1.16MM per delegate, one would think Republican voters would be enamored of Mitt Romney. After all, they're the taxcut and spend, spend, spend party. Look at those deficits, and they keep electing folks who run up even more debt. But they're not enamored of the slick Mitt Romney, and the New York Times has Romney facing reality today and quitting his VERY expensive run at the Republican nomination for President. (There's a headline without story at Time, too.)

Mitt Romney is quitting his campaign for president, having made the final decision last night, according to a campaign source who asked to remain anonymous.

He made the final decision last night, as he was preparing his speech for Thursday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, the source said.

"The speech will speak for itself," the source said.

This has got to have Rush Limbaugh and the other Republican pundits all sad and everything. They've lost their main guy willing to pander to anything they wanted, switch positions at the drop of a delegate. So, some of the so-called conservative Republicans who were pushing Romney just a day or so ago are asking John McCain to change some of his positions so that he'll be more palatable to them. These folks like Tony Perkins are inviting McCain to pander to them because now they know that Mitt Romney is a lost cause. Their meeting is today, where McCain will speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference. Yeah, he's going to tell a bunch of lobbyists that he's conservative, but I don't think they'll get all they want. Here's the New York Times story:

The editors of National Review wrote on the magazine's Web site on Wednesday that "aside from his opposition to pork-barrel spending, there is no domestic conservative cause that McCain has taken up." They added: "McCain can win over most conservatives, but their support is not his by right."

Another column on National Review's Web site specifically warned him not to "spend the bulk of the speech burnishing his conservative credentials," noting that "he has tried doing that, and a lot of conservatives are still left cold." Instead, the column argued that conservatives would want to hear "that he will fight for conservative ideas."

Others caution that any hint of concession could appear to be pandering and jeopardize the reputation for independence that is at the heart of Mr. McCain's appeal.

"Throwing people bones is not really the John McCain style," said Jim Dyke, a veteran Republican consultant who had worked for the Giuliani campaign. "That is not why people like him."

Mr. McCain, for his part, has already begun stepping up his efforts to remind his party's faithful that he truly belongs among them. "I am a Republican," he said in his victory speech on Tuesday night, repeating the phrase six times.

No, McCain may artfully note how much of a conservative he is on facing down porkbarrell spending, but he's not going to embrace these folks more than he has already, and Rush, at least, is still pretty livid. Remember, he and Ann Coulter have promised to campaign for Democrats if McCain wins. That sounds like a horror story in itself.

Meanwhile, McCain's best friend Joe Lieberman has been stripped of his position as a Democratic Super delegate. Seems his backing of McCain for President isn't compatible with voting for a Democrat at the convention. Bye, Joe! Maybe they'll let you speak at the Republican shindig.

UPDATE: In his withdrawal speech, Romney channeled Dick Cheney and claimed that a Democratic victory in November would bring another terrorist attack.

Digg!

Tagged as: conservatives, coulter, mccain, republican party, romney

Steven Reynolds is a regular blogger for the All Spin Zone


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And the polls...
Posted by: oregoncharles on Feb 7, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
show Hillary Clinton losing to McCain, who is now the nominee, and Obama in a tie with him.

We need to ask ourselves how this could be. How is it even possible that a Republican could be elected to much of anything this year? - let alone the Presidency!

Do you suppose it has anything to do with the behavior of the Democrats, especially in Congress, where both Hillary and Obama have very poor, well, basically Republican records?

I mean, you have to work really hard to poll lower than Bush, but the Democrats in Congress have pulled it off. But one or the other of them will be running against McCain (also a Senator, of course.)

Isn't there something wrong with this picture? Seriously, when I try to explain it I come off really paranoid - I won't even share those thoughts, though when I do nobody jumps on me.

Any explanations, out there? Why is it perfectly possible that McCain, or any Republican, will be the next President?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And the polls... Posted by: Gungneir
» RE: And the polls... Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: And the polls... Posted by: Gungneir
» RE: And the polls... Posted by: pkbutrfli
» Repeat to yourself... Posted by: Libertine
Things Could Come Down To...
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 7, 2008 12:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Things could come down to whom the Democratic and Republican candidates take as their running-mates.
My guess, because this is the MO of politicians lately, is that BOTH sides will move to the Right, by flip-flopping in their own positions and in picking vice-presidential nominees.
A far-Right VP candidate running with McCain would turn off many in the middle and on the left that had supported McCain -- but such a pick would help satisfy the Republican far-Right base.

I too am anxious about the polls showing McCain ahead of Hillary and even ahead of Obama (or so the polls read at this time). But as the public comes to know McCain they will see he is not a centerist after all. They might get a glimpse at his temper too. So his support might dwindle. This would all help me sleep at night, except I believe that as the public comes to know Hillary or Barack, whomever the nominee will be, the public might come to dislike them too. Hopefully this effect will be a bigger factor with McCain than with the Democrats' nominee.
As I said before, it could all come down to whom the candidates choose as running mates. Stay tuned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

all Americans should object to Romneys surreneder to terror deamgoguery.
Posted by: whealeydj on Feb 7, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Romney using the laguage I hoped had died in 2006 that a vote for a Democrats is a vote for terror. I will see if either Huckabee or Mccain denounces this type of language and remember in November. if you have doubts about Obama or Clinton I hope they and other Democrats denounce this type of slander.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once again,
Posted by: oregoncharles on Feb 7, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because I really would like an answer:

How did we get to where a Republican (McCain) might actually be the next president?

I don't see any answers here, and I was actually hoping for some.

Sure, the polls could turn out to be wrong: they're telling us what is POSSIBLE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Once again, Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Once again, Posted by: pkbutrfli
» RE: Once again, Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Once again, Posted by: pkbutrfli
» RE: Once again, Posted by: oregoncharles
McCain already wrote his own epitaph...
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Feb 7, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when he said he'd be happy to see us in Iraq for 100 years.
When the ads featuring that clip start showing up every hour on the hour, his ass is through even with some of the Repub sheep.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We can hope. Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: We can hope. Posted by: Gungneir
just as impotent as his father was
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 8, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a loser by his own admission, weak and unable to sell his snake oil talking-point-laden rhetoric. he offered nothing but the continuation of the loss of jobs in the us to feed the corporate powers. good riddance to this human piece of intellectual fluff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]